Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Omen
45.7% WR
VS
Chamber
54.3% WR
Who Wins the Omen vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 140
45.7%
Win Rate
54.3%
1.59
Avg KDA
1.30
15.8
Avg Kills
16.8
15.1
Avg Deaths
14.8
136.9
DMG/Round
142.9
30.7%
HS %
30.0%
211
Combat Score
218
47.8%
Attack WR
49.5%
50.5%
Defense WR
52.2%
Omen vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 140 matches reveals that Chamber holds a clear advantage over Omen in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Omen shows strength in one category, Chamber's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.59Omen
1.30Chamber
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.59 KDA versus Chamber's 1.30. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
136.9Omen
142.9Chamber
Chamber outputs 142.9 average damage per round, edging out Omen's 136.9 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Chamber secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.8%Omen
49.5%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Omen at 47.8% and Chamber at 49.5% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.5%Omen
52.2%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Omen posting a 50.5% win rate and Chamber at 52.2%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Omen vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 140 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 54.3% of the time compared to Omen's 45.7%, a 8.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Sentinel matchup, Chamber dominates this matchup statistically. Chamber can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Omen should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Omen vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Chamber edges out Omen in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 140 matches analyzed, this Omen vs Chamber matchup remains contestable for both sides. Omen shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Omen's favor.
Avg KDA
1.59Omen
1.30Chamber
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Chamber, maintaining a 1.59 KDA versus 1.30. This 0.30 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Chamber players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.8Omen
16.8Chamber
Chamber secures approximately 1.1 more kills per match than Omen in this head-to-head (16.8 vs 15.8). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Chamber contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Chamber's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Omen can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.1Omen
14.8Chamber
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Omen (15.1 deaths/game) and Chamber (14.8 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
136.9Omen
142.9Chamber
Chamber applies 5.9 more damage per round than Omen in this matchup (142.9 vs 136.9 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Chamber contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Omen can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.7%Omen
30.0%Chamber
Omen lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (30.7% vs 30.0%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 0.7 percentage point edge translates to Omen more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Chamber can fully react. Chamber players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Omen's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Omen vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Chamber
47.8%
49.5%
Defense Side
Chamber
50.5%
52.2%
Attack Side Breakdown
Chamber demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Omen in this matchup, converting 49.5% of attacking rounds versus 47.8%. While this 1.8 point edge gives Chamber slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Omen players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 140 competitive games suggests Chamber's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Omen teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.8% gap.
When taking entry duels, Chamber holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Omen players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Chamber can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Omen has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Omen matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Omen's hardest matchup?
Omen's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Omen have?
Omen has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Omen in difficult matchups?
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Omen's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Chamber's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Omen should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.8 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Chamber shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Omen, winning 52.2% of defense rounds compared to 50.5%. This 1.8 percentage point edge suggests Chamber's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Omen players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Chamber can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.8% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Omen should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Chamber demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Chamber converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Omen should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Chamber when you can wait for teammates. Chamber can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.8% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Omen should be more conservative with eco aggression against Chamber and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Chamber can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Chamber holds clear advantages on both attack (49.5%) and defense (52.2%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Omen vs Chamber matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Chamber doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Chamber's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Chamber performs better. Omen teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Omen with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Omen's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Chamber is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Chamber provides a measurable ranked advantage. Omen players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Chamber confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Chamber wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.5 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Omen isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Controller vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Controller (Omen) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Omen's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Omen's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Chamber advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Omen vs Chamber is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (45.7% vs 54.3%). Based on 140 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
