Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Omen
60.0% WR
VS
Viper
40.0% WR
Who Wins the Omen vs Viper Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 55
60.0%
Win Rate
40.0%
1.57
Avg KDA
1.31
15.6
Avg Kills
16.0
15.2
Avg Deaths
15.8
132.1
DMG/Round
140.6
28.3%
HS %
32.5%
203
Combat Score
210
50.7%
Attack WR
47.5%
52.5%
Defense WR
49.3%
Omen vs Viper Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 55 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Viper in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Viper shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.57Omen
1.31Viper
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.57 KDA versus Viper's 1.31. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
132.1Omen
140.6Viper
Viper outputs 140.6 average damage per round, edging out Omen's 132.1 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Viper secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
50.7%Omen
47.5%Viper
Omen shows stronger attack-side performance with a 50.7% win rate versus Viper's 47.5%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Omen provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
52.5%Omen
49.3%Viper
Defensive capabilities favor Omen at 52.5% win rate compared to Viper's 49.3%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Omen provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Omen vs Viper matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 55 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 60.0% of the time compared to Viper's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Controller matchup, Omen has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Viper should never take isolated fights against Omen and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Omen vs Viper Fragging Analysis
Viper edges out Omen in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 55 matches analyzed, this Omen vs Viper matchup remains contestable for both sides. Omen shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Omen's favor.
Avg KDA
1.57Omen
1.31Viper
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Viper, maintaining a 1.57 KDA versus 1.31. This 0.25 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Viper players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.6Omen
16.0Viper
Kill production between Omen and Viper is virtually identical, with Omen averaging 15.6 kills per game and Viper securing 16.0. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
15.2Omen
15.8Viper
Omen survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.2 times per game compared to Viper's 15.8 deaths. This 0.6 death difference per match means Omen is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Viper players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Omen's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
132.1Omen
140.6Viper
Viper applies 8.5 more damage per round than Omen in this matchup (140.6 vs 132.1 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Viper contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Omen can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
28.3%Omen
32.5%Viper
Viper demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Omen: 32.5% versus 28.3%. This 4.1 percentage point gap in precision means Viper ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Omen faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Omen vs Viper Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Omen
50.7%
47.5%
Defense Side
Omen
52.5%
49.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Omen holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Omen vs Viper matchup, winning 50.7% of offensive rounds compared to 47.5% for Viper. This 3.2 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 55 matches reveals Omen's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Omen consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Viper teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Omen's favor in this matchup. When Omen takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Viper. For Viper players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Omen's advantages. Omen can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Omen has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Omen matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Omen's hardest matchup?
Omen's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Omen have?
Omen has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Omen in difficult matchups?
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Omen's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Omen's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.2% attack-side gap suggests Omen excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Viper should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Omen's kit advantages become decisive. For Omen, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Omen demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Viper, holding 52.5% of rounds versus 49.3%. This 3.2 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Omen's defensive advantage. Omen can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Viper should avoid solo anchor positions against Omen — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Viper's site with Omen on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Omen in this matchup. Our 55 match analysis shows Omen converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Viper should never attempt solo retakes against Omen — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Omen can confidently take 1vX retakes that Viper should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Omen's defensive advantages. Viper should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Omen, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Omen can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Viper should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (50.7%) and defense (52.5%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Omen vs Viper matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Viper teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Viper with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Viper's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Viper players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.5 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Viper isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Controller vs Controller Dynamics
Both Omen and Viper fill the Controller role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Controller performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Omen is the stronger Controller pick when these agents face each other.
In Controller vs Controller encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Omen's statistical advantage suggests their specific Controller kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Omen vs Viper matchup breakdown: Omen dominates with a 60.0% win rate across 55 matches. Superior fragging (1.57 KDA) gives Omen a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
