Omen vs RazeMatchups
Omen vs Raze head-to-head analysis. Omen holds a 54.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 24 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Omen Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Raze(54.2%)Who Wins the Omen vs Raze Matchup?
Omen vs Raze Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 24 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Omen vs Raze Matchup Summary
The Omen vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 24 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 54.2% of the time compared to Raze's 45.8%, a 8.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Omen dominates this matchup statistically. Omen can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Raze should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Omen vs Raze Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 24 matches analyzed, this Omen vs Raze matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Omen vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance
47.9%45.8%54.2%52.1%Attack Side Breakdown
Omen demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Raze in this matchup, converting 47.9% of attacking rounds versus 45.8%. While this 2.1 point edge gives Omen slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 24 competitive games suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Raze teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Omen holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Raze players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
In post-plant situations, Omen's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Raze should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Omen shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Raze, winning 54.2% of defense rounds compared to 52.1%. This 2.1 percentage point edge suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Raze players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Omen can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Raze should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Omen demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Omen converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Raze should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Omen when you can wait for teammates. Omen can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Raze should be more conservative with eco aggression against Omen and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (47.9%) and defense (54.2%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Omen vs Raze matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Raze teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Raze with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Raze's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Raze players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.2 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Raze isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Omen) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Omen's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Omen's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Omen has favorable matchups against 7 agents and unfavorable matchups against 19 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Brimstone at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.99% | 107 | 1.51 | 131.6 | 31.5% | 43.3% | 53.4% | |
| 43.69% | 103 | 1.56 | 132.2 | 31.5% | 46.2% | 51.0% | |
| 53.09% | 81 | 1.60 | 136.2 | 30.6% | 51.3% | 50.2% | |
| 45.59% | 68 | 1.54 | 133.8 | 29.1% | 48.5% | 47.9% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 1.52 | 121.7 | 30.4% | 51.9% | 49.9% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 1.48 | 133.9 | 28.8% | 49.2% | 47.6% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.55 | 125.8 | 30.2% | 46.4% | 51.5% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.60 | 131.1 | 29.3% | 47.4% | 53.5% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 1.57 | 130.8 | 29.5% | 47.6% | 51.7% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 1.42 | 120.5 | 27.4% | 45.7% | 53.9% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.53 | 127.1 | 30.5% | 41.8% | 56.2% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.54 | 125.5 | 29.2% | 47.9% | 54.2% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 1.48 | 136.4 | 28.6% | 42.1% | 50.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.39 | 127.9 | 34.0% | 42.4% | 52.9% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.29 | 124.9 | 29.3% | 45.5% | 47.1% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.79 | 140.4 | 31.3% | 49.5% | 54.9% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.57 | 131.8 | 30.7% | 37.6% | 53.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.28 | 121.3 | 39.1% | 43.5% | 47.2% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.37 | 127.9 | 29.9% | 33.8% | 42.1% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.86 | 155.1 | 35.3% | 46.0% | 52.9% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.74 | 164.1 | 32.1% | 53.3% | 48.7% | |
| 25.00% | 4 | 1.81 | 159.4 | 29.3% | 57.1% | 39.1% | |
| 25.00% | 4 | 1.69 | 134.2 | 31.5% | 45.5% | 41.0% | |
| 66.67% | 3 | 1.44 | 92.8 | 24.8% | 36.1% | 63.9% | |
| 0.00% | 3 | 1.20 | 129.2 | 38.9% | 27.6% | 37.9% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.79 | 143.5 | 28.6% | 42.1% | 52.9% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Omen's best matchup in Valorant?
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Omen's hardest matchup?
Omen's hardest matchup is against Brimstone, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Omen have?
Omen has 7 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 19 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Omen in difficult matchups?
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Omen's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
