Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Omen
50.0% WR
VS
Raze
46.3% WR
Who Wins the Omen vs Raze Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 54
50.0%
Win Rate
46.3%
1.61
Avg KDA
1.30
14.9
Avg Kills
16.9
14.9
Avg Deaths
16.5
129.9
DMG/Round
154.6
28.5%
HS %
20.1%
200
Combat Score
231
49.4%
Attack WR
48.6%
51.4%
Defense WR
50.6%
Omen vs Raze Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 54 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.61Omen
1.30Raze
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.61 KDA versus Raze's 1.30. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
129.9Omen
154.6Raze
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (154.6 ADR) compared to Omen's 129.9 ADR. This 24.7 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
49.4%Omen
48.6%Raze
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Omen at 49.4% and Raze at 48.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.4%Omen
50.6%Raze
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Omen posting a 51.4% win rate and Raze at 50.6%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Omen vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 54 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 50.0% of the time compared to Raze's 46.3%, a 3.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Omen has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Raze players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Omen vs Raze Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 54 matches analyzed, this Omen vs Raze matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.61Omen
1.30Raze
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Raze, maintaining a 1.61 KDA versus 1.30. This 0.31 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Raze players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
14.9Omen
16.9Raze
Raze substantially outfrags Omen in this matchup, averaging 16.9 kills compared to 14.9 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Raze faces Omen, the data clearly shows Raze finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Omen players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Raze in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.9Omen
16.5Raze
Omen demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 14.9 deaths per game versus 16.5. Dying nearly 1.6 fewer times per match gives Omen significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
129.9Omen
154.6Raze
The damage differential between Raze and Omen is exceptional: 154.6 ADR compared to just 129.9. Raze deals 24.7 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Omen struggles to even trade effectively. Omen players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
28.5%Omen
20.1%Raze
The headshot percentage disparity between Omen and Raze is substantial: 28.5% compared to 20.1%, a 8.4 point difference. Omen consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Omen in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Omen's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Omen vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Omen
49.4%
48.6%
Defense Side
Omen
51.4%
50.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Omen and Raze reveals near-perfect parity, with Omen winning 49.4% of attacking rounds compared to Raze's 48.6%. This negligible 0.8 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Omen nor Raze should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 54 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Omen and Raze players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Omen or Raze, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Omen has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Omen matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Omen's hardest matchup?
Omen's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Omen have?
Omen has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Omen in difficult matchups?
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Omen's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.8% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Omen and Raze is virtually identical, with Omen holding 51.4% of rounds on CT side and Raze at 50.6%. This 0.8 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Omen and Raze can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.8% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Omen and Raze. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 54 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Omen or Raze.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Omen vs Raze specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.4% attack win rate and 51.4% defense win rate. While Omen is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Omen vs Raze specific factors. The slight Omen advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Omen and Raze are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Omen has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Omen just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Omen) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Omen's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Omen's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Omen vs Raze head-to-head analysis. Omen holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 54 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
