Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
54.4% WR
VS
Skye
44.4% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Skye Matchup?
Winner
Raze
Matches: 171
54.4%
Win Rate
44.4%
1.27
Avg KDA
1.46
16.4
Avg Kills
13.9
16.1
Avg Deaths
14.7
155.6
DMG/Round
123.6
21.1%
HS %
30.4%
233
Combat Score
189
46.4%
Attack WR
44.6%
55.4%
Defense WR
53.6%
Raze vs Skye Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 171 matches reveals that Raze holds a clear advantage over Skye in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Skye shows strength in one category, Raze's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.27Raze
1.46Skye
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Skye, with KDA ratios of 1.27 and 1.46 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
155.6Raze
123.6Skye
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (155.6 ADR) compared to Skye's 123.6 ADR. This 32.0 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
46.4%Raze
44.6%Skye
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 46.4% and Skye at 44.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
55.4%Raze
53.6%Skye
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 55.4% win rate and Skye at 53.6%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Skye matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 171 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 54.4% of the time compared to Skye's 44.4%, a 9.9 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Skye consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Raze dominates this matchup statistically. Raze can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Skye should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Raze vs Skye Fragging Analysis
Skye edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 171 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Skye matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.27Raze
1.46Skye
Skye holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.46 compared to Raze's 1.27. While this 0.19 point difference indicates Skye tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Skye's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Raze players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.4Raze
13.9Skye
Raze substantially outfrags Skye in this matchup, averaging 16.4 kills compared to 13.9 — a difference of nearly 2.5 eliminations per match. When Raze faces Skye, the data clearly shows Raze finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Skye players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Raze in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.1Raze
14.7Skye
Skye demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 14.7 deaths per game versus 16.1. Dying nearly 1.4 fewer times per match gives Skye significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
155.6Raze
123.6Skye
The damage differential between Raze and Skye is exceptional: 155.6 ADR compared to just 123.6. Raze deals 32.0 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Skye struggles to even trade effectively. Skye players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
21.1%Raze
30.4%Skye
The headshot percentage disparity between Skye and Raze is substantial: 30.4% compared to 21.1%, a 9.3 point difference. Skye consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Skye in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Skye's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Skye Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Raze
46.4%
44.6%
Defense Side
Raze
55.4%
53.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
Raze demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Skye in this matchup, converting 46.4% of attacking rounds versus 44.6%. While this 1.8 point edge gives Raze slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Skye players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 171 competitive games suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Skye teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.8% gap.
When taking entry duels, Raze holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Skye players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Raze's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Skye should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.8 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Raze shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Skye, winning 55.4% of defense rounds compared to 53.6%. This 1.8 percentage point edge suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Skye players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Raze can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.8% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Skye should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Raze demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Raze converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Skye should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Raze when you can wait for teammates. Raze can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.8% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Skye should be more conservative with eco aggression against Raze and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze holds clear advantages on both attack (46.4%) and defense (55.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs Skye matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Raze doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Raze's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Raze performs better. Skye teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Skye with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Skye's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Raze is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Raze provides a measurable ranked advantage. Skye players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Raze confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Raze wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.6 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Skye isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Initiator (Skye) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Skye's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Skye's Initiator kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze vs Skye head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 54.4% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 171 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
