Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Veto's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Veto
57.1% WR
VS
Vyse
42.9% WR
Who Wins the Veto vs Vyse Matchup?
Winner
Veto
Matches: 7
57.1%
Win Rate
42.9%
1.20
Avg KDA
1.26
17.1
Avg Kills
17.0
16.7
Avg Deaths
16.0
137.3
DMG/Round
142.5
34.7%
HS %
32.3%
209
Combat Score
211
52.6%
Attack WR
49.4%
50.6%
Defense WR
47.4%
Veto vs Vyse Performance Breakdown
The Veto vs Vyse matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 7 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.20Veto
1.26Vyse
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Veto and Vyse, with KDA ratios of 1.20 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
137.3Veto
142.5Vyse
Vyse outputs 142.5 average damage per round, edging out Veto's 137.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Vyse secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
52.6%Veto
49.4%Vyse
Veto shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.6% win rate versus Vyse's 49.4%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Veto provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
50.6%Veto
47.4%Vyse
Defensive capabilities favor Veto at 50.6% win rate compared to Vyse's 47.4%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Veto provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Veto vs Vyse matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 7 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 57.1% of the time compared to Vyse's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Veto has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Vyse should never take isolated fights against Veto and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Veto vs Vyse Fragging Analysis
Vyse edges out Veto in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 7 matches analyzed, this Veto vs Vyse matchup remains contestable for both sides. Veto shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Veto's favor.
Avg KDA
1.20Veto
1.26Vyse
The KDA comparison between Veto and Vyse reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Veto averaging 1.20 and Vyse posting 1.26. This razor-thin margin of just 0.06 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.1Veto
17.0Vyse
Kill production between Veto and Vyse is virtually identical, with Veto averaging 17.1 kills per game and Vyse securing 17.0. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.7Veto
16.0Vyse
Vyse survives longer in this matchup, dying 16.0 times per game compared to Veto's 16.7 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means Vyse is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Veto players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Vyse's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
137.3Veto
142.5Vyse
Vyse applies 5.3 more damage per round than Veto in this matchup (142.5 vs 137.3 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Vyse contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Veto can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
34.7%Veto
32.3%Vyse
Veto demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Vyse: 34.7% versus 32.3%. This 2.4 percentage point gap in precision means Veto ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Vyse faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Veto vs Vyse Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Veto
52.6%
49.4%
Defense Side
Veto
50.6%
47.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Veto holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Veto vs Vyse matchup, winning 52.6% of offensive rounds compared to 49.4% for Vyse. This 3.2 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 7 matches reveals Veto's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Veto consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Vyse teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Veto's favor in this matchup. When Veto takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Vyse. For Vyse players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Veto's advantages. Veto can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Veto has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Veto's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Iso at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Veto matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.04)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Veto's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Veto excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Veto's hardest matchup?
Veto's hardest matchup is against Iso, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Veto should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Veto have?
Veto has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Veto in difficult matchups?
When playing Veto in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Veto's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Veto's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Veto's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Veto's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.2% attack-side gap suggests Veto excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Vyse should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Veto's kit advantages become decisive. For Veto, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Veto demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Vyse, holding 50.6% of rounds versus 47.4%. This 3.2 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Veto's defensive advantage. Veto can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Vyse should avoid solo anchor positions against Veto — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Vyse's site with Veto on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Veto in this matchup. Our 7 match analysis shows Veto converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Vyse should never attempt solo retakes against Veto — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Veto can confidently take 1vX retakes that Vyse should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Veto's defensive advantages. Vyse should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Veto, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Veto can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Vyse should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Veto holds clear advantages on both attack (52.6%) and defense (50.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Veto vs Vyse matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Veto doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Veto's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Veto performs better. Vyse teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Vyse with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Vyse's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Veto is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Veto provides a measurable ranked advantage. Vyse players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Veto confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Veto wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.4 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Vyse isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Veto and Vyse fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Veto is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Veto's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Veto vs Vyse matchup breakdown: Veto dominates with a 57.1% win rate across 7 matches. Higher damage output (137 ADR) gives Veto a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
