Composiciones de Equipo TFT con Mayor Tasa de Victoria

Esta tabla muestra las composiciones de equipo de TFT con las tasas de victoria más altas, ayudándote a identificar las composiciones más exitosas para subir en clasificatoria. Composiciones de 8 campeones del Set 17: Pícaro (89.3% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (89.0% WR, 2.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (87.9% WR, 2.7 avg). Pícaro/N.O.V.A. lidera con 89.30% de win rate y 2.91 de placement promedio. N.O.V.A. sigue con 89.00% de win rate. Analizando 54 composiciones de 8 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
55.44%
Top 4 Rate
12.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.33
Avg Place
54.68%
Top 4 Rate
6.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
54.00%
Top 4 Rate
10.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.65
Avg Place
48.65%
Top 4 Rate
4.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
47.68%
Top 4 Rate
7.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.70
Avg Place
45.99%
Top 4 Rate
5.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.62
Avg Place
45.77%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.84
Avg Place
44.95%
Top 4 Rate
3.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.70
Avg Place
44.66%
Top 4 Rate
7.57%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.93
Avg Place
41.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.98
Avg Place
39.64%
Top 4 Rate
7.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.11
Avg Place
38.66%
Top 4 Rate
1.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
38.30%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.05
Avg Place
37.81%
Top 4 Rate
5.60%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.01
Avg Place
35.93%
Top 4 Rate
7.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.29
Avg Place
31.73%
Top 4 Rate
4.80%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
29.93%
Top 4 Rate
4.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.42
Avg Place
29.75%
Top 4 Rate
3.94%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.42
Avg Place
29.59%
Top 4 Rate
3.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.48
Avg Place
29.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.11%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.41
Avg Place
28.68%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
28.18%
Top 4 Rate
1.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
27.43%
Top 4 Rate
5.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.60
Avg Place
27.22%
Top 4 Rate
1.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
26.85%
Top 4 Rate
1.68%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.68
Avg Place
25.40%
Top 4 Rate
1.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.12%
Top 4 Rate
1.40%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.69
Avg Place
24.40%
Top 4 Rate
0.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.02
Avg Place
21.36%
Top 4 Rate
0.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.74
Avg Place
21.02%
Top 4 Rate
1.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.94
Avg Place
20.90%
Top 4 Rate
2.43%
First Place
Low Contested
5.93
Avg Place
20.10%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.18
Avg Place
17.28%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.26
Avg Place
13.42%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 54 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 72.2K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.7% and average placement of 4.61 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Pícaro/N.O.V.A. with Jax as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is N.O.V.A./Luchador at 89.0% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Luchador at 87.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Luchador (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune
  • N.O.V.A./Luchador (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Luchador which achieves first place in 27.6% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, N.O.V.A./Luchador offers the best average placement at 2.64.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A.: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Luchador: 89.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Luchador: 87.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Pícaro/Meeple with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Replicador/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

Comps de equipo TFT - Set 17 FAQ

¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17?

La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17 es Pícaro/N.O.V.A. con Jax como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 89.3% y un promedio de posición de 2.91. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango y consistentemente queda en el top 4.

¿Cómo jugar la composición Pícaro/N.O.V.A.?

Para jugar Pícaro/N.O.V.A., concéntrate en construir alrededor de Jax como tu carry principal. Busca Jax y unidades de soporte temprano, prioriza objetos que sinergicen con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada.

¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias consistentes de LP en TFT Set 17, N.O.V.A./Luchador ofrece el mejor promedio de posición con 2.64. Otras opciones confiables incluyen N.O.V.A./Luchador (prom. 2.68) y Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (prom. 2.91). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan las posiciones de bottom 4 y proporcionan una subida estable.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?

Pícaro/N.O.V.A. es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 89.3% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.

¿Cuándo forzar una composición vs ser flexible en TFT Set 17?

En TFT Set 17, Pícaro/Meeple tiene una tasa de selección del 3.3%, lo que significa que es muy disputada. Si ves que otros la juegan, considera pivotar a alternativas como Pícaro/N.O.V.A.. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos temprano, o cuando no esté disputada. Sé flexible cuando 2+ jugadores compiten por las mismas unidades.