
- Taux de victoire
- 50.2%
- Taux de sélection
- 8.8%
Inébranlable Meilleurs champions
- Patch
- 26.19
- Parties avec la rune
- 88 363
- Voie
- Toutes les voies
- Tier
- Tous les tiers
- Dernière mise à jour
- 10 oct. 2026 UTC
- Méthodologie
- Méthodologie des données
- Auteur
- Dakota Chinnick
- Arbre de runes
- Volonté · Rangée 3
- Taux de victoire
- 50.2%−0.2 vs moy. de la rangée
- Taux de sélection
- 8.8%
- Meilleur champion
- Gangplank · 57.5%
- Le plus joué par
- Thresh
- Voie principale
- Support · 45%
Meilleurs champions pour Inébranlable
Patch 26.19 · Tous les rangsGangplank est en tête avec 57.5% de victoires avec Inébranlable ; 81 champions la prennent ce patch.
- 1
GangplankTop57.5% avec la rune+8.3 vs moy. du champion285 parties - 2
RammusJungle53.9% avec la rune±0.0 vs moy. du champion3 061 parties - 3
YoneMid56.5% avec la rune+4.8 vs moy. du champion276 parties
Classement par taux de victoire avec la rune, ajusté selon la taille de l'échantillon : les petits échantillons sont ramenés vers la moyenne de la rune, pour qu'un champion avec quelques dizaines de parties chanceuses ne prenne pas la tête. Un champion doit avoir 200+ parties pour être considéré comme le meilleur.
Tous les champions qui prennent Inébranlable
121 combinaisons champion et voie avec 30+ parties. Cherchez un champion ou filtrez par voie et par tier.
Rang | Champion | Voie | Tier | Taux de victoire | Δ TV | Adoption | Parties | Meilleur Build de Runes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Top | S | 57.5% | +8.3 | 6.9% | 285 | — | |
| 2 | Jungle | S | 53.9% | +0.0 | 91.6% | 3 061 | ||
| 3 | Mid | S | 56.5% | +4.8 | 3.2% | 276 | — | |
| 4 | Jungle | S | 54.0% | +0.5 | 16.7% | 1 162 | — | |
| 5 | Mid | S | 63.4% | +12.2 | 0.8% | 71 | — | |
| 6 | Mid | S | 61.7% | +13.4 | 1.1% | 81 | — | |
| 7 | Mid | S | 53.5% | +0.7 | 62.7% | 889 | — | |
| 8 | Mid | S | 57.0% | +1.4 | 56.2% | 158 | ||
| 9 | Support | S | 54.0% | -0.1 | 72.9% | 400 | — | |
| 10 | Support | S | 61.1% | +12.6 | 1.7% | 72 | — | |
| 11 | Top | S | 59.1% | +8.1 | 30.1% | 88 | ||
| 12 | Support | S | 52.5% | +0.3 | 91.7% | 3 519 | ||
| 13 | Mid | S | 64.6% | +14.9 | 1.1% | 48 | — | |
| 14 | Mid | S | 56.2% | +2.5 | 59.8% | 146 | ||
| 15 | Top | S | 64.4% | +12.0 | 1.2% | 45 | — | |
| 16 | Top | S | 56.6% | +5.2 | 1.6% | 122 | — | |
| 17 | Support | S | 52.1% | +0.3 | 91.0% | 2 578 | ||
| 18 | Mid | S | 65.7% | +9.4 | 21.0% | 35 | — | |
| 19 | Top | A | 52.1% | +0.4 | 68.4% | 2 993 | ||
| 20 | Support | A | 63.4% | +8.2 | 2.8% | 41 | — | |
| 21 | Top | A | 56.5% | +8.1 | 3.0% | 92 | — | |
| 22 | Jungle | A | 59.3% | +8.4 | 6.0% | 54 | — | |
| 23 | Top | A | 51.8% | +1.1 | 64.5% | 4 043 | — | |
| 24 | Mid | A | 61.5% | +10.7 | 0.8% | 39 | — | |
| 25 | ADC | A | 55.4% | +3.5 | 43.8% | 92 | — | |
| 26 | Top | A | 51.8% | +0.7 | 57.3% | 1 540 | — | |
| 27 | Top | A | 56.5% | +4.0 | 2.2% | 69 | — | |
| 28 | Top | A | 51.6% | -0.0 | 51.3% | 4 193 | ||
| 29 | Top | A | 52.7% | +2.6 | 5.3% | 224 | — | |
| 30 | ADC | A | 54.7% | +3.3 | 3.5% | 86 | — | |
| 31 | Support | A | 51.3% | -0.4 | 41.4% | 3 203 | — | |
| 32 | Top | A | 54.3% | +4.1 | 1.9% | 81 | — | |
| 33 | Top | A | 51.8% | +3.4 | 49.3% | 334 | ||
| 34 | Jungle | A | 56.4% | +3.8 | 0.7% | 39 | ||
| 35 | ADC | A | 56.1% | +7.7 | 2.1% | 41 | — | |
| 36 | Support | A | 55.6% | +3.7 | 55.6% | 45 | ||
| 37 | Top | A | 55.1% | +7.7 | 2.6% | 49 | — | |
| 38 | Support | A | 51.3% | +0.2 | 43.3% | 618 | — | |
| 39 | Mid | A | 51.0% | +2.0 | 39.5% | 1 037 | ||
| 40 | Mid | A | 54.3% | +1.4 | 4.9% | 46 | — | |
| 41 | Support | A | 53.4% | +0.7 | 78.4% | 58 | ||
| 42 | Support | A | 50.8% | +0.2 | 88.1% | 8 949 | ||
| 43 | Top | A | 52.4% | -0.2 | 1.2% | 82 | — | |
| 44 | Top | A | 51.1% | +0.6 | 41.6% | 356 | ||
| 45 | Jungle | A | 53.3% | +0.1 | 1.2% | 30 | — | |
| 46 | Mid | A | 51.0% | +3.2 | 2.6% | 145 | — | |
| 47 | Mid | A | 51.6% | +5.9 | 3.1% | 62 | — | |
| 48 | Mid | A | 51.5% | -3.7 | 41.7% | 68 | — | |
| 49 | Jungle | B | 51.4% | -2.1 | 6.9% | 74 | — | |
| 50 | Top | B | 51.3% | +0.2 | 1.7% | 78 | — | |
| 51 | Top | B | 51.1% | -0.7 | 1.2% | 88 | — | |
| 52 | Top | B | 51.1% | +3.5 | 4.5% | 92 | — | |
| 53 | Jungle | B | 51.6% | +1.5 | 1.3% | 31 | — | |
| 54 | Top | B | 51.2% | +2.3 | 1.8% | 41 | — | |
| 55 | Support | B | 50.6% | +1.6 | 2.0% | 79 | — | |
| 56 | ADC | B | 50.6% | -0.5 | 47.2% | 83 | — | |
| 57 | Support | B | 50.3% | +0.2 | 55.1% | 499 | ||
| 58 | Support | B | 50.0% | +0.7 | 0.6% | 32 | — | |
| 59 | ADC | B | 50.0% | +0.8 | 1.1% | 54 | — | |
| 60 | Top | B | 50.2% | +1.0 | 3.8% | 243 | — | |
| 61 | Mid | B | 50.1% | -0.4 | 3.3% | 349 | — | |
| 62 | Support | B | 50.2% | +0.2 | 75.9% | 2 425 | ||
| 63 | Jungle | B | 48.6% | -1.1 | 5.1% | 35 | — | |
| 64 | Jungle | B | 48.6% | -3.1 | 21.0% | 37 | ||
| 65 | Top | B | 48.8% | -2.9 | 1.7% | 43 | — | |
| 66 | Mid | B | 49.1% | +0.7 | 1.0% | 55 | — | |
| 67 | Support | B | 49.9% | +0.4 | 24.1% | 1 412 | — | |
| 68 | Jungle | B | 49.9% | -2.2 | 21.7% | 890 | — | |
| 69 | Top | B | 48.6% | -1.0 | 2.0% | 74 | — | |
| 70 | Mid | B | 49.8% | +0.4 | 39.4% | 2 264 | ||
| 71 | Top | B | 48.2% | -0.9 | 3.7% | 83 | — | |
| 72 | Top | B | 47.9% | +0.8 | 83.5% | 71 | ||
| 73 | Mid | B | 47.7% | +1.2 | 2.8% | 65 | — | |
| 74 | ADC | B | 47.3% | -3.6 | 0.6% | 55 | — | |
| 75 | Top | B | 47.2% | -1.5 | 6.4% | 53 | — | |
| 76 | Jungle | B | 46.5% | -5.1 | 0.6% | 43 | — | |
| 77 | Mid | B | 45.2% | -5.2 | 0.9% | 31 | — | |
| 78 | Mid | B | 49.2% | +0.2 | 4.9% | 246 | — | |
| 79 | Support | B | 49.6% | -0.7 | 51.8% | 726 | — | |
| 80 | Jungle | B | 47.6% | -1.1 | 19.0% | 84 | — | |
| 81 | Mid | B | 47.6% | -2.8 | 63.2% | 84 | ||
| 82 | Support | B | 46.7% | -1.5 | 2.3% | 60 | — | |
| 83 | Support | B | 46.7% | -3.8 | 2.7% | 60 | — | |
| 84 | Top | B | 46.6% | -4.7 | 1.6% | 58 | — | |
| 85 | Top | B | 45.9% | -5.1 | 1.8% | 61 | — | |
| 86 | Jungle | B | 46.7% | -2.6 | 41.5% | 90 | ||
| 87 | Top | B | 49.0% | +1.7 | 65.8% | 702 | ||
| 88 | Support | B | 49.1% | +0.1 | 42.3% | 844 | ||
| 89 | ADC | B | 40.0% | -5.7 | 0.6% | 30 | — | |
| 90 | Support | B | 49.2% | +0.1 | 60.4% | 1 956 | — | |
| 91 | Top | C | 46.0% | -4.8 | 1.2% | 87 | — | |
| 92 | Top | C | 45.3% | -3.9 | 2.6% | 75 | — | |
| 93 | Top | C | 49.1% | -0.7 | 57.8% | 1 614 | — | |
| 94 | Top | C | 44.4% | -5.4 | 2.4% | 63 | — | |
| 95 | Top | C | 41.5% | -9.7 | 2.4% | 41 | — | |
| 96 | ADC | C | 39.4% | -8.5 | 0.7% | 33 | — | |
| 97 | Support | C | 49.0% | -0.8 | 45.2% | 1 252 | — | |
| 98 | Top | C | 47.1% | +0.9 | 7.0% | 153 | — | |
| 99 | Top | C | 49.0% | -0.3 | 72.2% | 3 816 | ||
| 100 | Top | C | 45.8% | -6.6 | 5.3% | 120 | — | |
| 101 | Support | C | 43.3% | -5.5 | 6.6% | 67 | — | |
| 102 | Top | C | 38.5% | -7.7 | 18.6% | 39 | — | |
| 103 | Top | C | 42.6% | -4.5 | 3.1% | 68 | — | |
| 104 | Top | C | 41.1% | -9.3 | 1.0% | 56 | — | |
| 105 | Top | C | 40.7% | -7.7 | 2.0% | 54 | — | |
| 106 | Support | C | 45.3% | -0.6 | 43.6% | 150 | ||
| 107 | Jungle | C | 38.9% | -12.6 | 2.0% | 54 | — | |
| 108 | Support | C | 43.9% | -3.7 | 19.5% | 114 | ||
| 109 | Support | C | 35.7% | -6.1 | 31.3% | 42 | ||
| 110 | Jungle | C | 43.0% | -4.5 | 4.9% | 100 | ||
| 111 | Top | C | 48.0% | -1.1 | 38.3% | 1 254 | — | |
| 112 | Support | C | 48.2% | -0.3 | 61.3% | 5 255 | — | |
| 113 | Mid | C | 39.1% | -7.3 | 42.4% | 64 | ||
| 114 | Top | C | 47.8% | -0.8 | 36.1% | 1 186 | ||
| 115 | Support | C | 43.7% | +2.2 | 12.3% | 135 | — | |
| 116 | Support | C | 48.0% | +0.0 | 54.7% | 3 166 | — | |
| 117 | Jungle | C | 47.2% | -2.2 | 15.2% | 757 | ||
| 118 | Mid | C | 47.3% | -2.1 | 32.7% | 1 139 | ||
| 119 | Mid | C | 46.5% | -1.5 | 39.4% | 1 141 | — | |
| 120 | Top | C | 45.9% | -3.5 | 41.0% | 1 210 | — | |
| 121 | Top | C | 45.8% | -2.7 | 24.2% | 1 772 | — | |
Champions qui prennent presque toujours Inébranlable
Braum prend Inébranlable dans 92% de ses parties. Un taux d'adoption élevé signifie que la rune est le choix par défaut pour ce champion.
Tiers des champions pour Inébranlable
Tous les champions qui prennent Inébranlable, regroupés selon leur taux de victoire avec la rune ajusté à l'échantillon (S = top 15%).
Prenez l'avantage décisif
Overlays en temps réel, suivi automatique des parties et outils exclusifs — tout ce qu'il vous faut pour grimper, gratuitement sur votre PC.
- Overlays en jeu
- Suivi automatique des parties
- Outils exclusifs de l'app de bureau
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
FAQ meilleurs champions pour Inébranlable – Patch 26.19
Quels sont les meilleurs champions pour Inébranlable au patch 26.19 ?
Par taux de victoire avec Inébranlable : Gangplank (57.5%), Rammus (53.9%), Yone (56.5%). 81 champions la prennent ce patch.
Quels champions utilisent le plus Inébranlable ?
Le plus de parties avec Inébranlable : Thresh (8 949), Nautilus (5 255), Sett (4 193).
Sur quelle voie joue-t-on Inébranlable ?
Inébranlable se joue surtout en Support (45.4% de ses parties).
Quel champion prend Inébranlable le plus systématiquement ?
Braum prend Inébranlable dans 92% de ses parties, le plus haut taux parmi les 81 champions qui l'utilisent.