Composições de Equipe TFT com Melhor Colocação Média

Esta tabela classifica as composições de equipe TFT pela colocação média final, mostrando quais comps consistentemente alcançam as melhores colocações. Composições de 9 campeões do Set 17: Replicador (97.0% WR, 1.8 avg), N.O.V.A. (91.0% WR, 2.0 avg), Estrela Negra (91.5% WR, 2.1 avg). Replicador/N.O.V.A. lidera com 96.97% de win rate e 1.80 de placement médio. N.O.V.A. segue com 91.00% de win rate. Analisando 69 composições de 9 campeões com estatísticas de desempenho em tempo real.

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Replicador/N.O.V.A. with Milio as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is Ladino/N.O.V.A. at 95.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Estrela Negra at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Replicador/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Milio
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • N.O.V.A./Estrela Negra (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Briar

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Duelista Divina which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Replicador/N.O.V.A.: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A.: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Estrela Negra: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Mipo/Tecelão do Destino with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. Desafiante/N.O.V.A. follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Comps de equipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Qual é a melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17?

A melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17 é Replicador/N.O.V.A. com Milio como carry principal, alcançando uma taxa de vitória de 97.0% e colocação média de 1.80. Esta composição é eficaz para subir de rank e consistentemente fica no top 4.

Como jogar a composição Replicador/N.O.V.A.?

Para jogar Replicador/N.O.V.A., foque em construir em torno de Milio como seu carry principal. Procure Milio e unidades de suporte cedo, priorize itens que sinergizam com seu carry, e mire seu pico de poder no nível 7-8. Esta composição tem uma taxa de pick de 0.1%, tornando-a uma opção relativamente não disputada.

Quais composições são boas para subir no TFT Set 17?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP no TFT Set 17, Replicador/N.O.V.A. oferece a melhor colocação média em 1.80. Outras opções confiáveis incluem N.O.V.A./Duelista Divina (média 1.98) e Estrela Negra/Lutador (média 2.14). Composições consistentes minimizam finais no bottom 4 e proporcionam uma subida estável.

Qual é a composição de TFT mais fácil de jogar?

Replicador/N.O.V.A. é uma ótima opção para jogadores buscando uma subida mais fácil. Com uma taxa de vitória de 97.0% mas apenas 0.1% de taxa de pick, você provavelmente não será contestado, tornando o jogo mais fácil de navegar. Baixa contestação significa que você pode encontrar suas unidades naturalmente sem forçar pivots.

Quando forçar uma composição vs ser flexível no TFT Set 17?

No TFT Set 17, Mipo/Tecelão do Destino tem uma taxa de pick de 1.5%, o que significa que é muito disputada. Se você ver outros jogando, considere pivotar para alternativas como Replicador/N.O.V.A.. Force uma composição quando acertar unidades e itens cedo, ou quando não estiver disputada. Seja flexível quando 2+ jogadores competem pelas mesmas unidades.

Qual é a composição de TFT mais consistente no TFT Set 17?

Replicador/N.O.V.A. tem a melhor colocação média em 1.80, tornando-a a composição mais consistente para subir. N.O.V.A./Duelista Divina segue com 1.98, e Estrela Negra/Lutador com 2.14. Colocação média mais baixa significa menos finais no bottom 4.

A colocação média é melhor que taxa de vitória para subir?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP, a colocação média é frequentemente mais confiável que taxa de vitória pura. Uma composição como Replicador/N.O.V.A. com colocação média de 1.80 minimiza grandes perdas de LP por finais no bottom 4. Composições de alta variância podem ganhar mais lobbies mas também ficar em 8° mais frequentemente. Para subir, consistência geralmente vence estratégias de apostas.