Rem
Taxa de Vitoria
59.6%
Partidas
61
KDA
3.79
Dano a jogadores
22,455

Rem vs Paradoxavs Paradoxa

Nível de habilidadeTodos os níveis de habilidade
Partidas7,344
Versao6487
Última atualização25 de mai. de 2026

Rem domina Paradoxa com uma impressionante 59.6% taxa de vitória em Deadlock. Em 61 jogos, Rem em média obtém 3.5 abates e -9,535 mais dano de jogador por partida. Este confronto favorável permite jogabilidade agressiva e oportunidades de luta antecipadas.

Rem Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Rem performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Paradoxa - 59.6% win rateParadoxa(59.6%)
Rem - 59.6% win rate in this matchup
Rem
59.6% WR
VS
Paradoxa vs Rem matchup - 40.7% win rate
Paradoxa
40.7% WR

Who Wins the Rem vs Paradoxa Matchup?

Rem wins the Rem vs Paradoxa matchup
Winner
Rem
Matches: 61
59.6%
Win Rate
40.7%
3.5
Avg Kills
4.7
5.1
Avg Deaths
6.8
16.0
Avg Assists
11.9
42,044
Avg Net Worth
39,591
22,455
Player DMG
31,990
5,019
Objective DMG
4,321
83.0
Last Hits
97.6

Rem vs Paradoxa Resumo do confronto

The Rem vs Paradoxa matchup in Deadlock is um confronto decisivamente unilateral. Based on 61 recent matches analyzed, Rem wins with a 59.6% win rate compared to Paradoxa's 40.7%, giving Rem a 19.0 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where Rem consistently outperforms. Rem has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. Paradoxa should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

Rem vs Paradoxa Análise de combate

Rem wins combat stats against Paradoxa in Deadlock

Rem edges out Paradoxa in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 61 matches analyzed, this Rem vs Paradoxa matchup remains contestable for both sides. Paradoxa shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Paradoxa's favor.

Proporção KDA
3.79Rem
2.44Paradoxa
The KDA disparity between Rem and Paradoxa is substantial: 3.79 versus 2.44, a commanding 1.35 point difference that reveals Rem's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 61 games shows Rem consistently outfragging and outliving Paradoxa in these encounters. For Paradoxa players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Rem whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Rem's mechanical advantage.
Abates médios
3.5Rem
4.7Paradoxa
Paradoxa secures approximately 1.2 more kills per match than Rem in this head-to-head (4.7 vs 3.5). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Paradoxa contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Paradoxa's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Rem can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Mortes médias
5.1Rem
6.8Paradoxa
Rem demonstrates markedly better survivability against Paradoxa, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives Rem significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. Paradoxa players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
Dano a jogadores
22,455Rem
31,990Paradoxa
The damage differential between Paradoxa and Rem is exceptional: 31,990 compared to just 22,455. Paradoxa deals 9,535 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Paradoxa's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Rem struggles to even trade effectively. Rem players should treat Paradoxa as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
Dano a objetivos
5,019Rem
4,321Paradoxa
Objective damage contribution is similar between Rem (5,019) and Paradoxa (4,321). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Rem vs Paradoxa Análise econômica

Patrimônio líquido
42,044Rem
39,591Paradoxa
Últimos golpes
83.0Rem
97.6Paradoxa

Rem vastly out-earns Paradoxa by 2,453 souls on average. This substantial economic gap means Rem will consistently hit item breakpoints earlier, creating a snowballing advantage throughout the game. Paradoxa secures more last hits (97.6 vs 83.0), while Paradoxa leads in denies (3.9 vs 2.1). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Itens recomendados para Rem vs Paradoxa

Rem build for Paradoxa matchup

Build Rem vs Paradoxa

This winning build for Rem against Paradoxa focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 59.6% win rate against Paradoxa, these 7 items help Rem press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Exposição Crescente, Surto de Poder, Compressão de Recarga, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 32,000 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Paradoxa build for Rem matchup

Build Paradoxa vs Rem

Paradoxa's counter-build against Rem attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Paradoxa players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Encantamento Balístico, Desaceleração Mística, Infusor, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 21,600 souls Knowing Paradoxa's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

Essas builds de itens são otimizadas para o confronto Rem vs Paradoxa com base em dados de taxa de vitória de 61 partidas competitivas. As escolhas de itens no Deadlock impactam significativamente os resultados dos confrontos — a build certa pode ajudar a superar desvantagens estatísticas ou ampliar vantagens existentes. Lembre-se de adaptar sua build com base no estado do jogo, composições de equipe, itens inimigos e se você está à frente ou atrás em almas.

Rem tem matchups favoráveis contra 15 heróis e matchups desfavoráveis contra 22 heróis no Deadlock. O matchup mais forte de Rem é contra Miragem com uma taxa de vitória de 66.0%. O matchup mais difícil é Calico com 29.4% de taxa de vitória. Use a tabela abaixo para encontrar detalhes específicos de matchups e recomendações de build.

Rem matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
45.00%1283.083.55.622,85740,145
43.36%1253.523.65.323,07241,213
48.70%1193.203.75.721,78739,218
46.30%1153.033.45.720,66038,597
51.43%1143.113.76.125,35342,843
58.00%1123.923.64.723,15440,889
42.57%1112.683.96.525,84741,600
53.54%1103.273.75.621,96040,513
51.58%1033.723.75.323,19843,335
48.31%1033.633.95.123,32541,392
49.46%993.413.45.323,22640,864
52.27%972.893.35.922,21340,158
48.86%963.003.65.923,54041,007
53.85%953.503.45.323,10341,862
42.17%903.144.06.124,91240,791
59.21%843.534.35.627,00044,397
47.95%843.193.65.924,94240,999
46.67%813.213.55.821,88642,100
47.50%813.323.35.522,21241,902
41.67%762.633.66.322,27939,431
48.61%753.493.45.423,89541,013
59.70%743.173.55.423,71342,371
59.70%733.474.35.623,22542,410
44.44%693.223.85.724,59042,894
55.36%663.523.95.622,55341,024
45.45%633.353.45.621,47439,734
47.37%623.344.05.925,80943,388
59.65%613.793.55.122,45542,044
48.15%583.092.95.318,53136,450
50.00%573.193.45.723,54039,704
48.00%553.373.05.220,95440,119
65.96%534.304.24.828,23744,296
42.86%482.973.65.624,82139,282
65.91%473.193.66.022,78741,888
48.89%453.254.26.025,15340,769
63.64%403.693.45.420,15940,047
29.41%382.692.95.922,99138,882

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Rem Matchups - FAQ

Qual é o melhor confronto de Rem no Deadlock?

O melhor confronto de Rem é contra Miragem, alcançando 66.0% de taxa de vitória. Rem se destaca neste confronto através de stats de combate superiores e interações de habilidade favoráveis.

Qual é o confronto mais difícil de Rem?

O confronto mais difícil de Rem é contra Calico, com apenas 29.4% de taxa de vitória. Contra este oponente, Rem deve focar em coordenação de equipe e itemização defensiva.

Quantos confrontos favoráveis Rem tem?

Rem tem 15 confrontos favoráveis (taxa de vitória 50%+) e 22 confrontos desfavoráveis no Deadlock. Entender essas dinâmicas de confronto ajuda você a fazer melhores seleções de herói e adaptar seu estilo de jogo.

Como eu devo jogar Rem em confrontos difíceis?

Quando jogando Rem em confrontos difíceis, priorize farm seguro, posicionamento e coordenação de equipe. Ajuste sua build de itens para compensar a desvantagem de confronto e procure por oportunidades de impactar lutas através de habilidades em vez de confrontação direta.

Quais stats devo focar nos confrontos de Rem?

Stats principais para analisar nos confrontos de Rem incluem taxa de vitória, proporção de KDA, dano médio do jogador e diferença de patrimônio líquido. Confrontos de dano alto favorecem jogo agressivo, enquanto confrontos de KDA baixa sugerem jogar mais defensivamente e confiar no suporte de equipe.