悖论
胜率
42.0%
场次
1,628
KDA
2.61

悖论 vs 开尔文 vs 开尔文

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
12,499
版本
6774
最后更新
2026年10月14日 UTC

开尔文 在 1,628 场比赛中仅以 42.0% 胜率硬克制 悖论。开尔文 平均获得 -0.2 更多击杀。面对这个克制时,优先考虑防御物品、队伍玩法并避免延长的交换。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中42.0%胜率
悖论
42.0% 胜率
VS
开尔文 vs 悖论对线 - 58.0%胜率
开尔文
58.0% 胜率

悖论 vs 开尔文对线谁赢?

开尔文赢得悖论 vs 开尔文对线
获胜者
开尔文
比赛: 1,628
42.0%
胜率
58.0%
5.2
场均击杀
5.0
6.4
场均死亡
5.4
11.6
场均助攻
14.7
38,710
场均净资产
40,203
34,515
玩家伤害
28,149
4,657
目标伤害
5,223
88.1
补刀
79.4

悖论 vs 开尔文 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 开尔文 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 1,628 recent matches analyzed, 开尔文 wins with a 58.0% win rate compared to 悖论's 42.0%, giving 开尔文 a 16.1 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 开尔文 consistently outperforms. 开尔文 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

悖论 vs 开尔文 战斗分析

开尔文 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

开尔文 edges out 悖论 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,628 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 开尔文 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 悖论 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 悖论's favor.

KDA比率
2.61悖论
3.65开尔文
The KDA disparity between 开尔文 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.65 versus 2.61, a commanding 1.04 point difference that reveals 开尔文's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 1,628 games shows 开尔文 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 开尔文 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 开尔文's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
5.2悖论
5.0开尔文
Kill production between 悖论 and 开尔文 is virtually identical, with 悖论 averaging 5.2 kills per game and 开尔文 securing 5.0. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
平均死亡
6.4悖论
5.4开尔文
开尔文 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 开尔文 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
34,515悖论
28,149开尔文
The damage differential between 悖论 and 开尔文 is exceptional: 34,515 compared to just 28,149. 悖论 deals 6,366 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 开尔文 struggles to even trade effectively. 开尔文 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
4,657悖论
5,223开尔文
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (4,657) and 开尔文 (5,223). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 开尔文 经济分析

净资产
38,710悖论
40,203开尔文
补刀
88.1悖论
79.4开尔文

开尔文 generates approximately 1,493 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 开尔文 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (88.1 vs 79.4), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.2 vs 2.8). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 开尔文 推荐装备

悖论 build for 开尔文 matchup

悖论对战开尔文装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 开尔文 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 58.0% win rate disadvantage against 开尔文, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 秘术管道, 伤上加伤, 灵力无边, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 43,599 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

开尔文 build for 悖论 matchup

开尔文对战悖论装备

开尔文's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 开尔文, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 水银重弹, 元灵燃烧, 元灵压制, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 30,400 souls Understanding 开尔文's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于1,628场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战开尔文进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对37名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是蜃景,胜率51.4%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率38.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6774)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
38.17%9,5392.654.96.231,80438,955
47.06%8,3112.745.26.332,95639,399
40.25%5,7562.615.46.633,64839,129
47.55%4,6122.705.26.433,24139,440
38.32%4,5962.524.96.431,06639,102
48.32%4,5342.695.46.734,84439,489
48.62%4,4512.685.56.634,09840,106
38.07%4,4002.595.06.431,58139,255
45.75%4,2542.605.36.633,62839,754
46.79%4,0972.675.06.332,93139,049
44.23%3,9322.605.36.633,42139,671
43.76%3,8392.525.36.933,36238,865
45.15%3,6012.565.46.632,92439,137
39.40%3,4262.645.26.432,62839,436
43.52%3,3412.675.16.432,94938,840
46.26%3,2732.735.26.332,59939,471
45.35%2,9152.635.46.733,24939,451
42.20%2,9122.575.36.633,50039,041
48.05%2,8952.615.36.732,84039,306
47.55%2,8582.645.26.534,11139,530
49.46%2,6672.675.46.733,47339,934
47.53%2,6072.605.46.733,50639,241
41.30%2,4992.495.16.733,78239,265
45.96%2,4852.625.46.735,22039,623
50.97%2,4212.775.56.434,27140,366
42.34%2,3902.585.26.534,59539,184
41.29%2,3032.605.16.433,40438,470
49.54%2,2872.715.46.534,65640,769
45.60%2,1692.635.36.634,43539,919
50.05%2,1502.795.66.634,62840,658
46.96%1,9252.595.56.933,81039,424
49.75%1,7772.655.36.533,99439,700
49.94%1,6622.895.56.234,00940,777
41.95%1,6282.615.26.434,51538,710
44.88%1,4932.735.26.231,65039,078
49.86%1,4722.795.46.234,40639,944
51.36%1,2852.735.26.334,10840,820
42.62%1,1312.725.26.132,56139,905
46.84%9652.675.36.533,73139,785
45.10%8472.893.64.523,65035,682
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗蜃景,达到51.4%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有38.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和37个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。