悖论
胜率
42.5%
场次
509
KDA
2.68
玩家伤害
35,891

悖论 vs 开尔文vs 开尔文

技能等级所有技能等级
场次6,758
版本6624
最后更新2026年7月10日

开尔文 在 509 场比赛中仅以 42.5% 胜率硬克制 悖论。开尔文 平均获得 -0.2 更多击杀。面对这个克制时,优先考虑防御物品、队伍玩法并避免延长的交换。

Metabot 徽标
MetaBot 桌面版
实时游戏内覆盖层
加入我们的 Discord
反馈Bug、功能建议与开发者交流
加入 Discord

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 42.5% win rate in this matchup
悖论
42.5% 胜率
VS
开尔文 vs 悖论 matchup - 58.4% win rate
开尔文
58.4% 胜率

悖论 vs 开尔文对线谁赢?

开尔文 wins the 悖论 vs 开尔文 matchup
获胜者
开尔文
比赛: 509
42.5%
胜率
58.4%
5.4
场均击杀
5.2
6.9
场均死亡
5.6
13.2
场均助攻
16.7
42,326
场均净资产
42,916
35,891
玩家伤害
30,629
5,712
目标伤害
5,491
99.8
补刀
87.8

悖论 vs 开尔文 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 开尔文 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 509 recent matches analyzed, 开尔文 wins with a 58.4% win rate compared to 悖论's 42.5%, giving 开尔文 a 15.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 开尔文 consistently outperforms. 开尔文 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

悖论 vs 开尔文 战斗分析

悖论 wins combat stats against 开尔文 in Deadlock

悖论 edges out 开尔文 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 509 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 开尔文 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 开尔文 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 开尔文's favor.

KDA比率
2.68悖论
3.90开尔文
The KDA disparity between 开尔文 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.90 versus 2.68, a commanding 1.22 point difference that reveals 开尔文's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 509 games shows 开尔文 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 开尔文 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 开尔文's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
5.4悖论
5.2开尔文
Kill production between 悖论 and 开尔文 is virtually identical, with 悖论 averaging 5.4 kills per game and 开尔文 securing 5.2. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
平均死亡
6.9悖论
5.6开尔文
开尔文 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 开尔文 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
35,891悖论
30,629开尔文
The damage differential between 悖论 and 开尔文 is exceptional: 35,891 compared to just 30,629. 悖论 deals 5,262 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 开尔文 struggles to even trade effectively. 开尔文 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
5,712悖论
5,491开尔文
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (5,712) and 开尔文 (5,491). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 开尔文 经济分析

净资产
42,326悖论
42,916开尔文
补刀
99.8悖论
87.8开尔文

开尔文 generates approximately 590 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 开尔文 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (99.8 vs 87.8), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.8 vs 3.1). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 开尔文 推荐装备

悖论 build for 开尔文 matchup

悖论对战开尔文装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 开尔文 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 57.5% win rate disadvantage against 开尔文, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 幸免于难, 痛苦脉冲, 特斯拉弹, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 32,800 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

开尔文 build for 悖论 matchup

开尔文对战悖论装备

开尔文's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 开尔文, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 抑制术, 幸免于难, 减益缩短, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 31,200 souls Understanding 开尔文's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于509场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战开尔文进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

悖论在Deadlock中对9名英雄有利,对28名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是西尔芙,胜率53.1%。最难对位是佩吉,胜率42.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6624)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
47.44%1,5972.665.37.134,06742,317
50.68%1,5882.675.67.334,73341,975
45.51%1,5282.665.77.335,24742,332
50.04%1,5092.695.47.033,50741,800
46.61%1,4732.585.57.334,88742,477
43.97%1,4362.645.87.335,35342,303
46.51%1,4312.565.37.333,66141,813
42.53%1,2742.675.67.134,69342,661
48.74%1,2362.795.87.034,63942,145
50.31%1,2042.685.47.134,37641,963
46.16%1,1932.755.57.034,38242,221
46.76%1,1822.685.26.933,33740,916
49.68%1,1622.685.67.334,44543,110
42.13%1,0472.535.47.233,22142,469
47.87%1,0422.645.67.333,50640,841
43.86%1,0162.685.77.134,50641,479
46.13%9882.605.47.233,30142,031
47.53%9852.605.57.333,85041,552
46.19%9712.585.47.435,26443,180
48.31%9652.735.57.033,24742,271
47.69%9552.615.67.335,02442,514
45.59%9252.665.57.135,41942,025
47.34%8832.685.57.135,14643,009
43.05%8802.585.27.032,16341,938
51.31%8282.775.87.035,25843,493
50.14%7792.885.77.035,28743,177
42.90%7372.665.57.234,96941,554
45.55%7342.585.37.133,72041,467
47.25%7322.695.57.135,96343,183
49.62%7112.795.77.235,13843,461
50.15%7112.795.97.335,09843,160
53.12%6932.795.87.133,65942,680
52.68%6192.825.66.934,84743,096
44.42%5412.765.46.835,04743,683
42.53%5092.685.46.935,89142,326
46.62%5012.655.37.032,18841,218
52.81%4462.965.66.734,21243,369

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

通过实时覆盖层、自动游戏检测和即时统计数据提升你的游戏体验。

游戏内覆盖层自动游戏检测多游戏支持个人仪表盘
立即下载免费下载
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗西尔芙,达到53.1%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗佩吉,仅有42.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有9个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和28个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。