悖论
胜率
48.6%
场次
4,451
KDA
2.68

悖论 vs 米娜 vs 米娜

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
12,499
版本
6774
最后更新
2026年10月14日 UTC

悖论 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 米娜 面临 48.6% 胜率的挑战。来自 4,451 场游戏的数据显示 悖论 平均有 0.3 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中48.6%胜率
悖论
48.6% 胜率
VS
米娜 vs 悖论对线 - 51.4%胜率
米娜
51.4% 胜率

悖论 vs 米娜对线谁赢?

米娜赢得悖论 vs 米娜对线
获胜者
米娜
比赛: 4,451
48.6%
胜率
51.4%
5.5
场均击杀
7.6
6.6
场均死亡
6.3
12.2
场均助攻
11.1
40,106
场均净资产
40,596
34,098
玩家伤害
29,915
4,976
目标伤害
5,453
90.7
补刀
87.5

悖论 vs 米娜 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 米娜 matchup in Deadlock is 相对均衡的对战,略有优势. Based on 4,451 recent matches analyzed, 米娜 wins with a 51.4% win rate compared to 悖论's 48.6%, giving 米娜 a 2.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where 悖论 consistently outperforms. 米娜 has a small statistical advantage, but 悖论 can absolutely win through smart play. The margin is thin enough that jungle rotations, team coordination, and mechanical outplays will often determine the outcome more than champion select.

悖论 vs 米娜 战斗分析

米娜 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

米娜 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 悖论 vs 米娜 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 4,451 ranked games reveals 米娜 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 米娜 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 米娜 dominates.

KDA比率
2.68悖论
2.99米娜
米娜 holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 2.99 compared to 悖论's 2.68. While this 0.30 point difference indicates 米娜 tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled 悖论 players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. 悖论 should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor 米娜's superior sustain.
平均击杀
5.5悖论
7.6米娜
米娜 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 7.6 kills compared to 5.5 — a difference of nearly 2.1 eliminations per match. When 米娜 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 米娜 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 米娜 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.6悖论
6.3米娜
米娜 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.3 times per game compared to 悖论's 6.6 deaths. This 0.3 death difference per match means 米娜 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 悖论 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 米娜's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
34,098悖论
29,915米娜
悖论 significantly outdamages 米娜 in head-to-head encounters, posting 34,098 average damage versus 29,915. This 4,183 damage advantage means 悖论 consistently wins the damage exchange in fights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. 米娜 players should avoid prolonged fights with 悖论 — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate.
目标伤害
4,976悖论
5,453米娜
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (4,976) and 米娜 (5,453). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 米娜 经济分析

净资产
40,106悖论
40,596米娜
补刀
90.7悖论
87.5米娜

悖论 and 米娜 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

悖论 vs 米娜 推荐装备

悖论 build for 米娜 matchup

悖论对战米娜装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 米娜 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 51.4% win rate disadvantage against 米娜, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 巫师护甲, 玻璃大炮, 元灵燃烧, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 44,800 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

米娜 build for 悖论 matchup

米娜对战悖论装备

米娜's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 米娜, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 积雷电容, 不屈之志, 超凡冷却, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 44,800 souls Understanding 米娜's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于4,451场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战米娜进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对37名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是蜃景,胜率51.4%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率38.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6774)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
38.17%9,5392.654.96.231,80438,955
47.06%8,3112.745.26.332,95639,399
40.25%5,7562.615.46.633,64839,129
47.55%4,6122.705.26.433,24139,440
38.32%4,5962.524.96.431,06639,102
48.32%4,5342.695.46.734,84439,489
48.62%4,4512.685.56.634,09840,106
38.07%4,4002.595.06.431,58139,255
45.75%4,2542.605.36.633,62839,754
46.79%4,0972.675.06.332,93139,049
44.23%3,9322.605.36.633,42139,671
43.76%3,8392.525.36.933,36238,865
45.15%3,6012.565.46.632,92439,137
39.40%3,4262.645.26.432,62839,436
43.52%3,3412.675.16.432,94938,840
46.26%3,2732.735.26.332,59939,471
45.35%2,9152.635.46.733,24939,451
42.20%2,9122.575.36.633,50039,041
48.05%2,8952.615.36.732,84039,306
47.55%2,8582.645.26.534,11139,530
49.46%2,6672.675.46.733,47339,934
47.53%2,6072.605.46.733,50639,241
41.30%2,4992.495.16.733,78239,265
45.96%2,4852.625.46.735,22039,623
50.97%2,4212.775.56.434,27140,366
42.34%2,3902.585.26.534,59539,184
41.29%2,3032.605.16.433,40438,470
49.54%2,2872.715.46.534,65640,769
45.60%2,1692.635.36.634,43539,919
50.05%2,1502.795.66.634,62840,658
46.96%1,9252.595.56.933,81039,424
49.75%1,7772.655.36.533,99439,700
49.94%1,6622.895.56.234,00940,777
41.95%1,6282.615.26.434,51538,710
44.88%1,4932.735.26.231,65039,078
49.86%1,4722.795.46.234,40639,944
51.36%1,2852.735.26.334,10840,820
42.62%1,1312.725.26.132,56139,905
46.84%9652.675.36.533,73139,785
45.10%8472.893.64.523,65035,682
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗蜃景,达到51.4%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有38.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和37个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。