悖论
胜率
48.4%
场次
2,342
KDA
2.64
玩家伤害
35,176

悖论 vs 大和vs 大和

技能等级所有技能等级
场次8,334
版本6430
最后更新2026年4月11日

悖论 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 大和 面临 48.4% 胜率的挑战。来自 2,342 场游戏的数据显示 悖论 平均有 -0.8 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

悖论 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 悖论 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
大和 - 48.4% win rate大和(48.4%)
悖论 - 48.4% win rate in this matchup
悖论
48.4% WR
VS
大和 vs 悖论 matchup - 51.9% win rate
大和
51.9% WR

Who Wins the 悖论 vs 大和 Matchup?

大和 wins the 悖论 vs 大和 matchup
Winner
大和
Matches: 2,342
48.4%
Win Rate
51.9%
5.2
Avg Kills
8.1
6.9
Avg Deaths
7.7
12.9
Avg Assists
11.9
42,260
Avg Net Worth
42,423
35,176
Player DMG
39,857
5,241
Objective DMG
6,300
100.3
Last Hits
84.5

悖论 vs 大和 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 大和 matchup in Deadlock is 适度有利的对战. Based on 2,342 recent matches analyzed, 大和 wins with a 51.9% win rate compared to 悖论's 48.4%, giving 大和 a 3.5 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 大和 consistently outperforms. 大和 holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. 悖论 players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

悖论 vs 大和 战斗分析

大和 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

大和 edges out 悖论 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 2,342 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 大和 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 悖论 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 悖论's favor.

KDA比率
2.64悖论
2.60大和
The KDA comparison between 悖论 and 大和 reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with 悖论 averaging 2.64 and 大和 posting 2.60. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
平均击杀
5.2悖论
8.1大和
大和 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.1 kills compared to 5.2 — a difference of nearly 2.9 eliminations per match. When 大和 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 大和 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 大和 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.9悖论
7.7大和
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.9 times per game compared to 大和's 7.7 deaths. This 0.8 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 大和 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
35,176悖论
39,857大和
大和 significantly outdamages 悖论 in head-to-head encounters, posting 39,857 average damage versus 35,176. This 4,681 damage advantage means 大和 consistently wins the damage exchange in fights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. 悖论 players should avoid prolonged fights with 大和 — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate.
目标伤害
5,241悖论
6,300大和
大和 contributes 1,059 more objective damage than 悖论 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 大和 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 悖论 should focus on creating picks while 大和 pushes objectives.

悖论 vs 大和 经济分析

净资产
42,260悖论
42,423大和
补刀
100.3悖论
84.5大和

悖论 and 大和 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. 悖论 secures more last hits (100.3 vs 84.5), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.8 vs 2.3). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 大和 推荐装备

悖论 build for 大和 matchup

悖论对战大和装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 大和 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 51.6% win rate disadvantage against 大和, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 近战疗法, 扩容弹匣, 沉默子弹, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 20,800 souls The build emphasizes early power spikes with cost-efficient items, allowing you to stay relevant even when 大和 has an inherent advantage.

大和 build for 悖论 matchup

大和对战悖论装备

大和's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 大和, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 雷织漩涡, 施术之手, 秘术缓速, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 32,000 souls Understanding 大和's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于2,342场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战大和进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

悖论在Deadlock中对7名英雄有利,对30名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是灰爪,胜率53.7%。最难对位是岚梦,胜率40.9%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6430)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
42.62%5,3282.675.26.734,78342,842
49.16%5,1392.695.16.634,59742,542
40.94%5,0602.635.36.835,55742,422
44.61%4,3052.605.26.835,07442,625
47.88%4,1992.695.16.634,65942,146
49.44%4,0522.585.16.934,37142,972
42.81%3,8302.595.36.937,38042,591
42.09%3,6712.615.46.935,24442,723
46.07%3,6662.465.17.234,61842,522
45.38%3,4862.615.16.934,65742,369
48.20%3,3882.645.36.936,41343,663
46.43%3,3842.655.16.633,91642,850
52.41%3,2112.765.77.036,71142,979
47.01%3,1992.685.16.634,95742,172
46.48%3,1982.605.16.934,89342,349
47.77%2,9512.595.06.834,43142,100
46.09%2,9192.665.26.836,02842,832
47.70%2,8492.655.26.835,15243,138
47.88%2,8212.635.06.735,53343,021
43.78%2,8032.695.16.636,11641,980
50.97%2,6772.785.26.635,37943,340
46.07%2,6372.665.26.835,87642,292
47.69%2,6052.765.46.836,82342,749
49.10%2,5832.555.06.933,07142,053
47.84%2,5212.715.16.834,78042,384
48.43%2,3422.645.26.935,17642,260
42.31%2,2902.595.06.736,35741,506
45.23%2,0382.605.06.734,31542,149
50.08%1,9772.715.57.036,53743,840
51.33%1,9552.735.36.635,66943,132
47.00%1,8972.515.17.134,53742,198
46.41%1,8812.655.16.735,52043,079
46.45%1,8522.665.16.635,16243,304
49.18%1,5352.715.36.734,64342,621
52.34%1,4042.645.26.834,52442,397
53.73%1,3882.695.36.634,20142,727
52.27%1,2412.855.36.535,66843,358

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗灰爪,达到53.7%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗岚梦,仅有40.9%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有7个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和30个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。