悖论
胜率
47.5%
场次
985
KDA
2.60
玩家伤害
33,850

悖论 vs 大和vs 大和

技能等级所有技能等级
场次4,970
版本6628
最后更新2026年7月10日

悖论 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 大和 面临 47.5% 胜率的挑战。来自 985 场游戏的数据显示 悖论 平均有 -0.7 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

Metabot 徽标
MetaBot 桌面版
实时游戏内覆盖层
加入我们的 Discord
反馈Bug、功能建议与开发者交流
加入 Discord

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 47.5% win rate in this matchup
悖论
47.5% 胜率
VS
大和 vs 悖论 matchup - 52.7% win rate
大和
52.7% 胜率

悖论 vs 大和对线谁赢?

大和 wins the 悖论 vs 大和 matchup
获胜者
大和
比赛: 985
47.5%
胜率
52.7%
5.5
场均击杀
8.5
7.3
场均死亡
8.0
13.5
场均助攻
13.1
41,552
场均净资产
41,271
33,850
玩家伤害
36,269
5,872
目标伤害
6,653
98.4
补刀
82.8

悖论 vs 大和 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 大和 matchup in Deadlock is 适度有利的对战. Based on 985 recent matches analyzed, 大和 wins with a 52.7% win rate compared to 悖论's 47.5%, giving 大和 a 5.2 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 大和 consistently outperforms. 大和 holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. 悖论 players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

悖论 vs 大和 战斗分析

大和 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

大和 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 悖论 vs 大和 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 985 ranked games reveals 大和 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 大和 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 大和 dominates.

KDA比率
2.60悖论
2.69大和
The KDA comparison between 悖论 and 大和 reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with 悖论 averaging 2.60 and 大和 posting 2.69. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
平均击杀
5.5悖论
8.5大和
大和 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.5 kills compared to 5.5 — a difference of nearly 3.0 eliminations per match. When 大和 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 大和 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 大和 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
7.3悖论
8.0大和
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 7.3 times per game compared to 大和's 8.0 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 大和 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
33,850悖论
36,269大和
大和 applies 2,419 more damage per game than 悖论 in this matchup (36,269 vs 33,850). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 大和 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 悖论 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
5,872悖论
6,653大和
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (5,872) and 大和 (6,653). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 大和 经济分析

净资产
41,552悖论
41,271大和
补刀
98.4悖论
82.8大和

悖论 and 大和 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. 悖论 secures more last hits (98.4 vs 82.8), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.6 vs 2.0). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 大和 推荐装备

悖论 build for 大和 matchup

悖论对战大和装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 大和 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 52.5% win rate disadvantage against 大和, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 元灵压制, 施术之手, 巫师护甲, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 29,600 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

大和 build for 悖论 matchup

大和对战悖论装备

大和's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 大和, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 幸运一击, 聚焦透镜, 疾跑靴, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 19,200 souls Understanding 大和's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于985场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战大和进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

悖论在Deadlock中对9名英雄有利,对28名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是西尔芙,胜率53.1%。最难对位是佩吉,胜率42.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6628)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
47.47%1,5982.665.37.134,05542,312
50.68%1,5882.675.67.334,73341,975
45.51%1,5282.665.77.335,24742,332
50.04%1,5092.695.47.033,50741,800
46.61%1,4732.585.57.334,88742,477
43.97%1,4362.645.87.335,35342,303
46.51%1,4312.565.37.333,66141,813
42.53%1,2742.675.67.134,69342,661
48.74%1,2362.795.87.034,63942,145
50.31%1,2042.685.47.134,37641,963
46.16%1,1932.755.57.034,38242,221
46.76%1,1822.685.26.933,33740,916
49.68%1,1622.685.67.334,44543,110
42.13%1,0472.535.47.233,22142,469
47.87%1,0422.645.67.333,50640,841
43.86%1,0162.685.77.134,50641,479
46.13%9882.605.47.233,30142,031
47.53%9852.605.57.333,85041,552
46.25%9722.585.47.435,24243,170
48.31%9652.735.57.033,24742,271
47.69%9552.615.67.335,02442,514
45.59%9252.665.57.135,41942,025
47.34%8832.685.57.135,14643,009
43.05%8802.585.27.032,16341,938
51.37%8292.775.87.035,23243,481
50.14%7792.885.77.035,28743,177
42.90%7372.665.57.234,96941,554
45.55%7342.585.37.133,72041,467
47.25%7322.695.57.135,96343,183
49.62%7112.795.77.235,13843,461
50.15%7112.795.97.335,09843,160
53.12%6932.795.87.133,65942,680
52.68%6192.825.66.934,84743,096
44.42%5412.765.46.835,04743,683
42.53%5092.685.46.935,89142,326
46.62%5012.655.37.032,18841,218
52.81%4462.965.66.734,21243,369

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

通过实时覆盖层、自动游戏检测和即时统计数据提升你的游戏体验。

游戏内覆盖层自动游戏检测多游戏支持个人仪表盘
立即下载免费下载
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗西尔芙,达到53.1%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗佩吉,仅有42.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有9个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和28个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。