悖论
胜率
47.5%
场次
2,607
KDA
2.60

悖论 vs 大和 vs 大和

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
12,499
版本
6774
最后更新
2026年10月14日 UTC

悖论 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 大和 面临 47.5% 胜率的挑战。来自 2,607 场游戏的数据显示 悖论 平均有 -0.5 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中47.5%胜率
悖论
47.5% 胜率
VS
大和 vs 悖论对线 - 52.5%胜率
大和
52.5% 胜率

悖论 vs 大和对线谁赢?

大和赢得悖论 vs 大和对线
获胜者
大和
比赛: 2,607
47.5%
胜率
52.5%
5.4
场均击杀
8.3
6.7
场均死亡
7.3
12.1
场均助攻
11.7
39,241
场均净资产
39,353
33,506
玩家伤害
32,146
4,694
目标伤害
5,512
88.1
补刀
71.8

悖论 vs 大和 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 大和 matchup in Deadlock is 适度有利的对战. Based on 2,607 recent matches analyzed, 大和 wins with a 52.5% win rate compared to 悖论's 47.5%, giving 大和 a 4.9 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 大和 consistently outperforms. 大和 holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. 悖论 players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

悖论 vs 大和 战斗分析

大和 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

大和 edges out 悖论 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 2,607 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 大和 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 悖论 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 悖论's favor.

KDA比率
2.60悖论
2.75大和
大和 holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 2.75 compared to 悖论's 2.60. While this 0.16 point difference indicates 大和 tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled 悖论 players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. 悖论 should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor 大和's superior sustain.
平均击杀
5.4悖论
8.3大和
大和 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.3 kills compared to 5.4 — a difference of nearly 2.9 eliminations per match. When 大和 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 大和 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 大和 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.7悖论
7.3大和
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.7 times per game compared to 大和's 7.3 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 大和 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
33,506悖论
32,146大和
悖论 applies 1,360 more damage per game than 大和 in this matchup (33,506 vs 32,146). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 悖论 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 大和 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
4,694悖论
5,512大和
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (4,694) and 大和 (5,512). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 大和 经济分析

净资产
39,241悖论
39,353大和
补刀
88.1悖论
71.8大和

悖论 and 大和 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. 悖论 secures more last hits (88.1 vs 71.8), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.2 vs 2.0). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 大和 推荐装备

悖论 build for 大和 matchup

悖论对战大和装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 大和 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 52.5% win rate disadvantage against 大和, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 元灵燃烧, 玻璃大炮, 秘术余波, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 44,800 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

大和 build for 悖论 matchup

大和对战悖论装备

大和's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 大和, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 狂乱, 刷新环, 巨人, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,000 souls Understanding 大和's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于2,607场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战大和进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对37名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是蜃景,胜率51.4%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率38.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6774)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
38.17%9,5392.654.96.231,80438,955
47.06%8,3112.745.26.332,95639,399
40.25%5,7562.615.46.633,64839,129
47.55%4,6122.705.26.433,24139,440
38.32%4,5962.524.96.431,06639,102
48.32%4,5342.695.46.734,84439,489
48.62%4,4512.685.56.634,09840,106
38.07%4,4002.595.06.431,58139,255
45.75%4,2542.605.36.633,62839,754
46.79%4,0972.675.06.332,93139,049
44.23%3,9322.605.36.633,42139,671
43.76%3,8392.525.36.933,36238,865
45.15%3,6012.565.46.632,92439,137
39.40%3,4262.645.26.432,62839,436
43.52%3,3412.675.16.432,94938,840
46.26%3,2732.735.26.332,59939,471
45.35%2,9152.635.46.733,24939,451
42.20%2,9122.575.36.633,50039,041
48.05%2,8952.615.36.732,84039,306
47.55%2,8582.645.26.534,11139,530
49.46%2,6672.675.46.733,47339,934
47.53%2,6072.605.46.733,50639,241
41.30%2,4992.495.16.733,78239,265
45.96%2,4852.625.46.735,22039,623
50.97%2,4212.775.56.434,27140,366
42.34%2,3902.585.26.534,59539,184
41.29%2,3032.605.16.433,40438,470
49.54%2,2872.715.46.534,65640,769
45.60%2,1692.635.36.634,43539,919
50.05%2,1502.795.66.634,62840,658
46.96%1,9252.595.56.933,81039,424
49.75%1,7772.655.36.533,99439,700
49.94%1,6622.895.56.234,00940,777
41.95%1,6282.615.26.434,51538,710
44.88%1,4932.735.26.231,65039,078
49.86%1,4722.795.46.234,40639,944
51.36%1,2852.735.26.334,10840,820
42.62%1,1312.725.26.132,56139,905
46.84%9652.675.36.533,73139,785
45.10%8472.893.64.523,65035,682
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗蜃景,达到51.4%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有38.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和37个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。