悖论
胜率
34.5%
场次
61
KDA
2.67
玩家伤害
33,703

悖论 vs 大和vs 大和

技能等级所有技能等级
场次6,478
版本6487
最后更新2026年5月26日

大和 在 61 场比赛中仅以 34.5% 胜率硬克制 悖论。大和 平均获得 2.8 更多击杀。面对这个克制时,优先考虑防御物品、队伍玩法并避免延长的交换。

悖论 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 悖论 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
大和 - 34.5% win rate大和(34.5%)
悖论 - 34.5% win rate in this matchup
悖论
34.5% WR
VS
大和 vs 悖论 matchup - 64.9% win rate
大和
64.9% WR

Who Wins the 悖论 vs 大和 Matchup?

大和 wins the 悖论 vs 大和 matchup
Winner
大和
Matches: 61
34.5%
Win Rate
64.9%
5.4
Avg Kills
8.2
6.4
Avg Deaths
6.7
11.6
Avg Assists
12.2
40,608
Avg Net Worth
41,516
33,703
Player DMG
35,670
4,539
Objective DMG
6,903
93.9
Last Hits
83.9

悖论 vs 大和 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 大和 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 61 recent matches analyzed, 大和 wins with a 64.9% win rate compared to 悖论's 34.5%, giving 大和 a 30.4 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 大和 consistently outperforms. 大和 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

悖论 vs 大和 战斗分析

大和 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

大和 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 悖论 vs 大和 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 61 ranked games reveals 大和 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 大和 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 大和 dominates.

KDA比率
2.67悖论
3.03大和
大和 holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 3.03 compared to 悖论's 2.67. While this 0.36 point difference indicates 大和 tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled 悖论 players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. 悖论 should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor 大和's superior sustain.
平均击杀
5.4悖论
8.2大和
大和 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.2 kills compared to 5.4 — a difference of nearly 2.8 eliminations per match. When 大和 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 大和 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 大和 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.4悖论
6.7大和
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.4 times per game compared to 大和's 6.7 deaths. This 0.3 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 大和 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
33,703悖论
35,670大和
大和 applies 1,967 more damage per game than 悖论 in this matchup (35,670 vs 33,703). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 大和 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 悖论 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
4,539悖论
6,903大和
大和 contributes 2,364 more objective damage than 悖论 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 大和 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 悖论 should focus on creating picks while 大和 pushes objectives.

悖论 vs 大和 经济分析

净资产
40,608悖论
41,516大和
补刀
93.9悖论
83.9大和

大和 generates approximately 908 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 大和 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (93.9 vs 83.9), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.8 vs 2.4). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 大和 推荐装备

悖论 build for 大和 matchup

悖论对战大和装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 大和 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 65.5% win rate disadvantage against 大和, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 雷鸣卷轴, 战斗背心, 粉碎护甲, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 18,400 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

大和 build for 悖论 matchup

大和对战悖论装备

大和's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 大和, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 近战蓄力, 加速回复, 回应射击, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 16,800 souls Understanding 大和's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于61场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战大和进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

悖论在Deadlock中对17名英雄有利,对20名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是哈雷黛,胜率74.1%。最难对位是青藤,胜率31.5%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
55.67%1052.644.86.430,65938,294
58.43%962.625.06.732,70140,461
55.42%902.745.16.332,18139,729
47.50%892.504.66.729,97040,655
37.66%892.655.06.131,25039,106
46.91%872.615.16.833,07740,899
53.85%822.755.66.435,33541,617
60.26%822.914.76.732,24042,209
48.00%782.564.96.629,54938,762
50.00%752.475.17.434,25942,296
37.50%742.224.46.829,54037,521
46.88%722.934.85.829,70239,666
46.27%722.294.66.729,99038,559
53.13%682.664.96.632,42542,352
56.67%662.785.57.231,95142,725
47.69%662.635.46.933,74242,086
49.12%652.455.17.032,87241,457
56.67%642.884.86.028,65639,846
34.48%612.675.46.433,70340,608
40.68%612.444.76.831,99039,591
47.27%582.204.66.727,37536,469
53.70%572.915.66.232,57241,467
31.48%572.444.96.933,62639,359
60.38%572.765.36.530,96439,845
44.44%562.374.76.732,57339,504
33.33%522.595.26.632,46941,306
52.94%522.756.47.437,27443,903
54.35%502.784.86.531,38442,179
65.91%463.335.95.832,73942,778
37.21%452.404.56.530,41138,813
44.74%412.625.26.734,96542,628
45.00%412.405.77.137,05345,816
50.00%392.964.75.932,59741,376
51.43%362.083.77.428,76538,516
33.33%342.455.27.234,89042,903
36.67%332.675.06.531,05537,673
74.07%292.845.76.431,63140,366

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗哈雷黛,达到74.1%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗青藤,仅有31.5%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有17个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和20个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。