悖论
胜率
47.0%
场次
1,925
KDA
2.59

悖论 vs 卡厉可 vs 卡厉可

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
12,499
版本
6774
最后更新
2026年10月12日 UTC

悖论 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 卡厉可 面临 47.0% 胜率的挑战。来自 1,925 场游戏的数据显示 悖论 平均有 0.4 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中47.0%胜率
悖论
47.0% 胜率
VS
卡厉可 vs 悖论对线 - 53.0%胜率
卡厉可
53.0% 胜率

悖论 vs 卡厉可对线谁赢?

卡厉可赢得悖论 vs 卡厉可对线
获胜者
卡厉可
比赛: 1,925
47.0%
胜率
53.0%
5.5
场均击杀
8.2
6.9
场均死亡
6.5
12.3
场均助攻
13.2
39,424
场均净资产
42,478
33,810
玩家伤害
32,169
4,867
目标伤害
5,291
89.7
补刀
65.7

悖论 vs 卡厉可 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 卡厉可 matchup in Deadlock is 显著的统计优势. Based on 1,925 recent matches analyzed, 卡厉可 wins with a 53.0% win rate compared to 悖论's 47.0%, giving 卡厉可 a 6.1 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 卡厉可 consistently outperforms. 卡厉可 dominates this matchup statistically. 卡厉可 can play aggressively and look for solo kills, while 悖论 should focus on minimizing losses, farming safely, and relying on teammates to even the odds.

悖论 vs 卡厉可 战斗分析

卡厉可 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

卡厉可 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 悖论 vs 卡厉可 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 1,925 ranked games reveals 卡厉可 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 卡厉可 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 卡厉可 dominates.

KDA比率
2.59悖论
3.30卡厉可
The KDA disparity between 卡厉可 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.30 versus 2.59, a commanding 0.72 point difference that reveals 卡厉可's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 1,925 games shows 卡厉可 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 卡厉可 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 卡厉可's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
5.5悖论
8.2卡厉可
卡厉可 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 8.2 kills compared to 5.5 — a difference of nearly 2.7 eliminations per match. When 卡厉可 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 卡厉可 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 卡厉可 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.9悖论
6.5卡厉可
卡厉可 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.5 times per game compared to 悖论's 6.9 deaths. This 0.4 death difference per match means 卡厉可 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 悖论 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 卡厉可's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
33,810悖论
32,169卡厉可
悖论 applies 1,641 more damage per game than 卡厉可 in this matchup (33,810 vs 32,169). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 悖论 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 卡厉可 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
4,867悖论
5,291卡厉可
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (4,867) and 卡厉可 (5,291). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 卡厉可 经济分析

净资产
39,424悖论
42,478卡厉可
补刀
89.7悖论
65.7卡厉可

卡厉可 vastly out-earns 悖论 by 3,054 souls on average. This substantial economic gap means 卡厉可 will consistently hit item breakpoints earlier, creating a snowballing advantage throughout the game. 悖论 secures more last hits (89.7 vs 65.7), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.3 vs 2.8). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 卡厉可 推荐装备

悖论 build for 卡厉可 matchup

悖论对战卡厉可装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 卡厉可 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 53.0% win rate disadvantage against 卡厉可, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 身躯虚化, 元灵燃烧, 玻璃大炮, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 40,000 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

卡厉可 build for 悖论 matchup

卡厉可对战悖论装备

卡厉可's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 卡厉可, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 元灵燃烧, 不屈之志, 超凡冷却, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 44,800 souls Understanding 卡厉可's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于1,925场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战卡厉可进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对37名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是蜃景,胜率51.4%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率38.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6774)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
38.17%9,5392.654.96.231,80438,955
47.06%8,3112.745.26.332,95639,399
40.25%5,7562.615.46.633,64839,129
47.55%4,6122.705.26.433,24139,440
38.32%4,5962.524.96.431,06639,102
48.32%4,5342.695.46.734,84439,489
48.62%4,4512.685.56.634,09840,106
38.07%4,4002.595.06.431,58139,255
45.75%4,2542.605.36.633,62839,754
46.79%4,0972.675.06.332,93139,049
44.23%3,9322.605.36.633,42139,671
43.76%3,8392.525.36.933,36238,865
45.15%3,6012.565.46.632,92439,137
39.40%3,4262.645.26.432,62839,436
43.52%3,3412.675.16.432,94938,840
46.26%3,2732.735.26.332,59939,471
45.35%2,9152.635.46.733,24939,451
42.20%2,9122.575.36.633,50039,041
48.05%2,8952.615.36.732,84039,306
47.55%2,8582.645.26.534,11139,530
49.46%2,6672.675.46.733,47339,934
47.53%2,6072.605.46.733,50639,241
41.30%2,4992.495.16.733,78239,265
45.96%2,4852.625.46.735,22039,623
50.97%2,4212.775.56.434,27140,366
42.34%2,3902.585.26.534,59539,184
41.29%2,3032.605.16.433,40438,470
49.54%2,2872.715.46.534,65640,769
45.60%2,1692.635.36.634,43539,919
50.05%2,1502.795.66.634,62840,658
46.96%1,9252.595.56.933,81039,424
49.75%1,7772.655.36.533,99439,700
49.94%1,6622.895.56.234,00940,777
41.95%1,6282.615.26.434,51538,710
44.88%1,4932.735.26.231,65039,078
49.86%1,4722.795.46.234,40639,944
51.36%1,2852.735.26.334,10840,820
42.62%1,1312.725.26.132,56139,905
46.84%9652.675.36.533,73139,785
45.10%8472.893.64.523,65035,682
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗蜃景,达到51.4%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有38.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和37个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。