悖论
胜率
49.5%
场次
2,287
KDA
2.71

悖论 vs 门侍 vs 门侍

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
12,499
版本
6774
最后更新
2026年10月13日 UTC

悖论 vs 门侍 的对位在 2,287 场比赛中非常接近,胜率为 49.5% vs 50.5%。门侍 在死亡比率上略占优势。个人技术和位置将比英雄选择更多地决定这个均衡对位的结果。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中49.5%胜率
悖论
49.5% 胜率
VS
门侍 vs 悖论对线 - 50.5%胜率
门侍
50.5% 胜率

悖论 vs 门侍对线谁赢?

门侍赢得悖论 vs 门侍对线
获胜者
门侍
比赛: 2,287
49.5%
胜率
50.5%
5.4
场均击杀
4.7
6.5
场均死亡
5.4
12.3
场均助攻
12.8
40,769
场均净资产
41,142
34,656
玩家伤害
28,383
4,919
目标伤害
3,821
90.5
补刀
89.3

悖论 vs 门侍 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup in Deadlock is 一场极其接近的对战,个人技能是决定性因素. Based on 2,287 recent matches analyzed, 门侍 wins with a 50.5% win rate compared to 悖论's 49.5%, giving 门侍 a 0.9 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 悖论 consistently outperforms. Both 悖论 and 门侍 have roughly equal chances of winning. Focus on outplaying your opponent through superior positioning, ability usage, and map awareness rather than relying on any inherent hero advantage.

悖论 vs 门侍 战斗分析

悖论 wins combat stats against 门侍 in Deadlock

悖论 edges out 门侍 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 2,287 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 门侍 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 门侍's favor.

KDA比率
2.71悖论
3.24门侍
门侍 demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against 悖论, maintaining a 3.24 KDA versus 2.71. This 0.53 point gap reflects 门侍's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. 悖论 players facing 门侍 should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate ability usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where 门侍's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
平均击杀
5.4悖论
4.7门侍
悖论 secures approximately 0.8 more kills per match than 门侍 in this head-to-head (5.4 vs 4.7). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to 悖论 contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates 悖论's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though 门侍 can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
平均死亡
6.5悖论
5.4门侍
门侍 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 门侍 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
34,656悖论
28,383门侍
The damage differential between 悖论 and 门侍 is exceptional: 34,656 compared to just 28,383. 悖论 deals 6,273 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 门侍 struggles to even trade effectively. 门侍 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
4,919悖论
3,821门侍
悖论 contributes 1,098 more objective damage than 门侍 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 悖论 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 门侍 should focus on creating picks while 悖论 pushes objectives.

悖论 vs 门侍 经济分析

净资产
40,769悖论
41,142门侍
补刀
90.5悖论
89.3门侍

悖论 and 门侍 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

悖论 vs 门侍 推荐装备

悖论 build for 门侍 matchup

悖论对战门侍装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 门侍 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 50.5% win rate disadvantage against 门侍, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 破咒护符, 秘术余波, 头弹破防, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 39,200 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

门侍 build for 悖论 matchup

门侍对战悖论装备

门侍's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 门侍, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 秘术余波, 元灵燃烧, 破咒护符, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 40,000 souls Understanding 门侍's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于2,287场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战门侍进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对37名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是蜃景,胜率51.4%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率38.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6774)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
38.17%9,5392.654.96.231,80438,955
47.06%8,3112.745.26.332,95639,399
40.25%5,7562.615.46.633,64839,129
47.55%4,6122.705.26.433,24139,440
38.32%4,5962.524.96.431,06639,102
48.32%4,5342.695.46.734,84439,489
48.62%4,4512.685.56.634,09840,106
38.07%4,4002.595.06.431,58139,255
45.75%4,2542.605.36.633,62839,754
46.79%4,0972.675.06.332,93139,049
44.23%3,9322.605.36.633,42139,671
43.76%3,8392.525.36.933,36238,865
45.15%3,6012.565.46.632,92439,137
39.40%3,4262.645.26.432,62839,436
43.52%3,3412.675.16.432,94938,840
46.26%3,2732.735.26.332,59939,471
45.35%2,9152.635.46.733,24939,451
42.20%2,9122.575.36.633,50039,041
48.05%2,8952.615.36.732,84039,306
47.55%2,8582.645.26.534,11139,530
49.46%2,6672.675.46.733,47339,934
47.53%2,6072.605.46.733,50639,241
41.30%2,4992.495.16.733,78239,265
45.96%2,4852.625.46.735,22039,623
50.97%2,4212.775.56.434,27140,366
42.34%2,3902.585.26.534,59539,184
41.29%2,3032.605.16.433,40438,470
49.54%2,2872.715.46.534,65640,769
45.60%2,1692.635.36.634,43539,919
50.05%2,1502.795.66.634,62840,658
46.96%1,9252.595.56.933,81039,424
49.75%1,7772.655.36.533,99439,700
49.94%1,6622.895.56.234,00940,777
41.95%1,6282.615.26.434,51538,710
44.88%1,4932.735.26.231,65039,078
49.86%1,4722.795.46.234,40639,944
51.36%1,2852.735.26.334,10840,820
42.62%1,1312.725.26.132,56139,905
46.84%9652.675.36.533,73139,785
45.10%8472.893.64.523,65035,682
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗蜃景,达到51.4%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有38.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和37个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。