悖论 vs 门侍 - 47.3% 胜率 | Deadlock 对位

统计技能 Build 克制协同对位阵容

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比

悖论

47.3% 胜率

门侍

53.1% 胜率

悖论 vs 门侍对线谁赢？

获胜者

门侍

比赛: 731

47.3%

胜率

53.1%

5.5

场均击杀

5.2

7.1

场均死亡

5.7

13.7

场均助攻

14.1

43,213

场均净资产

43,685

36,004

玩家伤害

31,840

5,995

目标伤害

5,156

101.7

补刀

104.9

悖论 vs 门侍对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup in Deadlock is 适度有利的对战. Based on 731 recent matches analyzed, 门侍 wins with a 53.1% win rate compared to 悖论's 47.3%, giving 门侍 a 5.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 门侍 consistently outperforms. 门侍 holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. 悖论 players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

悖论 vs 门侍战斗分析

悖论 edges out 门侍 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 731 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 门侍 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 门侍's favor.

KDA比率

2.69悖论

3.41门侍

The KDA disparity between 门侍 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.41 versus 2.69, a commanding 0.72 point difference that reveals 门侍's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 731 games shows 门侍 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 门侍 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 门侍's mechanical advantage.

平均击杀

5.5悖论

5.2门侍

Kill production between 悖论 and 门侍 is virtually identical, with 悖论 averaging 5.5 kills per game and 门侍 securing 5.2. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.

平均死亡

7.1悖论

5.7门侍

门侍 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 门侍 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.

玩家伤害

36,004悖论

31,840门侍

悖论 significantly outdamages 门侍 in head-to-head encounters, posting 36,004 average damage versus 31,840. This 4,164 damage advantage means 悖论 consistently wins the damage exchange in fights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. 门侍 players should avoid prolonged fights with 悖论 — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate.

目标伤害

5,995悖论

5,156门侍

Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (5,995) and 门侍 (5,156). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 门侍经济分析

净资产

43,213悖论

43,685门侍

补刀

101.7悖论

104.9门侍

悖论 and 门侍 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

悖论 vs 门侍推荐装备

悖论对战门侍装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 门侍 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 52.7% win rate disadvantage against 门侍, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 穿甲弹, 积雷电容, 跳弹射击, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,000 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

门侍对战悖论装备

门侍's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 门侍, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 狂战士, 施术之手, 头弹破防, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 27,200 souls Understanding 门侍's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于731场竞技比赛的胜率数据，针对悖论对战门侍进行优化的。在Deadlock中，装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

从门侍的视角查看此对战

悖论在Deadlock中对9名英雄有利，对28名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是西尔芙，胜率53.0%。最难对位是佩吉，胜率42.2%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6628)
对手	胜率	场次	KDA	击杀	死亡	玩家伤害	净资产
希弗	47.50%	1,597	2.66	5.3	7.1	34,073	42,325
比波普	50.68%	1,588	2.67	5.6	7.3	34,733	41,975
孤猎	45.51%	1,528	2.66	5.7	7.3	35,247	42,332
诛邪者	50.04%	1,509	2.69	5.4	7.0	33,507	41,800
炽焱	46.65%	1,472	2.58	5.5	7.3	34,918	42,498
岚梦	43.97%	1,436	2.64	5.8	7.3	35,353	42,303
劳什	46.51%	1,431	2.56	5.3	7.3	33,661	41,813
柒	42.53%	1,274	2.67	5.6	7.1	34,693	42,661
比利	48.74%	1,236	2.79	5.8	7.0	34,639	42,145
雷姆	50.31%	1,204	2.68	5.4	7.1	34,376	41,963
亚伯兰	46.16%	1,193	2.75	5.5	7.0	34,382	42,221
灵魅	46.81%	1,183	2.68	5.2	6.9	33,332	40,914
米娜	49.68%	1,162	2.68	5.6	7.3	34,445	43,110
佩吉	42.17%	1,046	2.53	5.4	7.2	33,241	42,478
卡厉可	47.87%	1,042	2.64	5.6	7.3	33,506	40,841
青藤	43.86%	1,016	2.68	5.7	7.1	34,506	41,479
薇妲	46.08%	989	2.60	5.4	7.2	33,297	42,032
大和	47.53%	985	2.60	5.5	7.3	33,850	41,552
维克多	46.25%	972	2.58	5.4	7.4	35,242	43,170
赛凌	48.31%	965	2.73	5.5	7.0	33,247	42,271
哈雷黛	47.69%	955	2.61	5.6	7.3	35,024	42,514
奇能	45.59%	925	2.66	5.5	7.1	35,419	42,025
盖斯特夫人	47.40%	884	2.68	5.5	7.1	35,137	43,003
格瑞墓	43.12%	881	2.58	5.2	7.0	32,158	41,933
魔液	51.37%	829	2.77	5.8	7.0	35,232	43,481
蜃景	50.07%	780	2.88	5.7	7.0	35,279	43,177
莫克双雄	42.99%	738	2.67	5.5	7.2	34,959	41,549
沃督	45.55%	734	2.58	5.3	7.1	33,720	41,467
门侍	47.31%	731	2.69	5.5	7.1	36,004	43,213
口袋	50.23%	712	2.79	5.9	7.3	35,087	43,152
阿波罗	49.70%	710	2.79	5.7	7.2	35,171	43,475
西尔芙	53.03%	694	2.79	5.8	7.1	33,652	42,680
灰爪	52.50%	619	2.82	5.6	7.0	34,857	43,112
麦金妮	44.31%	540	2.76	5.4	6.8	35,070	43,702
开尔文	42.41%	508	2.67	5.4	7.0	35,916	42,344
蝰邪	46.62%	501	2.65	5.3	7.0	32,188	41,218
无双魔术师	52.81%	446	2.96	5.6	6.7	34,212	43,369
无结果

🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么？

悖论最好的对阵是对抗西尔芙，达到53.0%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么？

悖论最难的对阵是对抗佩吉，仅有42.2%的胜率。对抗此对手时，悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵？

悖论在Deadlock中有9个有利的对阵（50%+胜率）和28个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论？

在悖论的困难对阵中，优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势，并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性？

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法，而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。

另请参阅

悖论统计悖论 Build 悖论克制悖论配合所有英雄

悖论 vs 门侍vs 门侍

悖论对线分析

悖论 vs 门侍对线谁赢？

悖论 vs 门侍对战摘要

悖论 vs 门侍战斗分析

悖论 vs 门侍经济分析

悖论 vs 门侍推荐装备

悖论对战门侍装备

门侍对战悖论装备

悖论对战 - 正面交锋表现

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么？

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么？

悖论有多少有利的对阵？

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论？

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性？

另请参阅

悖论 vs 门侍•vs 门侍

悖论对线分析

悖论 vs 门侍对线谁赢？

悖论 vs 门侍 对战摘要

悖论 vs 门侍 战斗分析

悖论 vs 门侍 经济分析

悖论 vs 门侍 推荐装备

悖论对战门侍装备

门侍对战悖论装备

悖论对战 - 正面交锋表现

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么？

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么？

悖论有多少有利的对阵？

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论？

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性？

另请参阅

悖论 vs 门侍vs 门侍

悖论 vs 门侍对战摘要

悖论 vs 门侍战斗分析

悖论 vs 门侍经济分析

悖论 vs 门侍推荐装备