悖论
胜率
50.5%
场次
1,065
KDA
2.75
玩家伤害
27,492

悖论 vs 门侍vs 门侍

技能等级所有技能等级
场次2,680
版本6325
最后更新2026年2月25日
MethodologyData Methodology

悖论 vs 门侍 的对位在 1,065 场比赛中非常接近,胜率为 50.5% vs 50.2%。门侍 在死亡比率上略占优势。个人技术和位置将比英雄选择更多地决定这个均衡对位的结果。

悖论 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 悖论 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
门侍 - 50.5% win rate门侍(50.5%)
悖论 - 50.5% win rate in this matchup
悖论
50.5% WR
VS
门侍 vs 悖论 matchup - 50.2% win rate
门侍
50.2% WR

Who Wins the 悖论 vs 门侍 Matchup?

悖论 wins the 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup
Winner
悖论
Matches: 1,065
50.5%
Win Rate
50.2%
5.3
Avg Kills
5.4
6.9
Avg Deaths
6.1
13.7
Avg Assists
13.1
39,111
Avg Net Worth
38,968
27,492
Player DMG
27,454
5,972
Objective DMG
4,886
84.9
Last Hits
88.9

悖论 vs 门侍 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup in Deadlock is 一场极其接近的对战,个人技能是决定性因素. Based on 1,065 recent matches analyzed, 悖论 wins with a 50.5% win rate compared to 门侍's 50.2%, giving 悖论 a 0.3 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 悖论 consistently outperforms. Both 悖论 and 门侍 have roughly equal chances of winning. Focus on outplaying your opponent through superior positioning, ability usage, and map awareness rather than relying on any inherent hero advantage.

悖论 vs 门侍 战斗分析

门侍 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

门侍 edges out 悖论 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,065 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 悖论 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 悖论's favor.

KDA比率
2.75悖论
3.05门侍
门侍 holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 3.05 compared to 悖论's 2.75. While this 0.30 point difference indicates 门侍 tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled 悖论 players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. 悖论 should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor 门侍's superior sustain.
平均击杀
5.3悖论
5.4门侍
Kill production between 悖论 and 门侍 is virtually identical, with 悖论 averaging 5.3 kills per game and 门侍 securing 5.4. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
平均死亡
6.9悖论
6.1门侍
门侍 survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.1 times per game compared to 悖论's 6.9 deaths. This 0.8 death difference per match means 门侍 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 悖论 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 门侍's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
27,492悖论
27,454门侍
Player damage output is remarkably close in the 悖论 vs 门侍 matchup. 悖论 deals 27,492 average damage while 门侍 deals 27,454. This parity indicates both heroes apply similar pressure in fights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these heroes face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing encounters — instead, the deciding factors become ability timing, positioning, and coordination with teammates.
目标伤害
5,972悖论
4,886门侍
悖论 contributes 1,086 more objective damage than 门侍 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 悖论 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 门侍 should focus on creating picks while 悖论 pushes objectives.

悖论 vs 门侍 经济分析

净资产
39,111悖论
38,968门侍
补刀
84.9悖论
88.9门侍

悖论 and 门侍 have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

悖论 vs 门侍 推荐装备

悖论 build for 门侍 matchup

悖论对战门侍装备

This winning build for 悖论 against 门侍 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 50.5% win rate against 门侍, these 7 items help 悖论 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 高速装填, 元灵压制, 减速弹, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 19,200 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

门侍 build for 悖论 matchup

门侍对战悖论装备

门侍's counter-build against 悖论 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 门侍 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 生命打击, 重压射击, 对等还击, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 29,600 souls Knowing 门侍's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于1,065场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战门侍进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

悖论在Deadlock中对10名英雄有利,对23名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是灰爪,胜率52.7%。最难对位是维克多,胜率42.4%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6325)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
50.52%5,3512.835.36.927,71739,508
45.79%3,3652.735.47.027,41439,106
48.95%3,0162.685.37.027,41139,205
50.64%2,4812.755.57.128,09539,828
44.81%2,4632.595.37.227,82739,461
44.47%2,1282.695.26.927,30139,131
48.94%1,9872.745.37.027,70638,975
47.61%1,9312.765.46.927,58539,342
48.92%1,8952.705.27.127,20739,188
49.33%1,7632.685.27.127,76039,345
51.32%1,7552.875.56.927,75339,745
46.28%1,7432.645.27.127,05838,752
42.38%1,7062.695.06.827,55038,411
50.18%1,4962.905.26.627,20439,092
48.21%1,4562.775.57.028,23139,826
47.52%1,4442.775.26.827,16539,267
49.21%1,3622.775.37.027,71139,321
46.19%1,3402.705.37.028,43239,207
45.34%1,3352.765.16.727,02238,805
45.67%1,3352.715.17.027,10338,981
51.00%1,3032.735.37.227,45839,804
46.86%1,2242.735.16.827,49438,889
49.86%1,1712.605.17.127,62539,301
49.34%1,1532.605.17.226,47739,208
46.73%1,1152.785.36.627,42039,104
50.50%1,0652.755.36.927,49239,111
47.92%9222.715.16.826,33237,769
49.83%9202.665.57.227,70639,580
48.35%9132.735.37.128,07839,258
52.08%7462.785.46.827,67740,096
52.69%6672.715.16.927,01339,273
52.35%5242.865.36.727,40939,006
50.60%4572.795.67.029,69839,352
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗灰爪,达到52.7%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗维克多,仅有42.4%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有10个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和23个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。

悖论 vs 门侍 - 50.5% 胜率 | Deadlock 对位 | MetaBot.GG