悖论
胜率
43.6%
场次
3,195
KDA
2.60

悖论 vs 孤猎 vs 孤猎

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
38,500
版本
6860
最后更新
2026年11月8日 UTC

孤猎 在 3,195 场比赛中仅以 43.6% 胜率硬克制 悖论。孤猎 平均获得 2.9 更多击杀。面对这个克制时,优先考虑防御物品、队伍玩法并避免延长的交换。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中43.6%胜率
悖论
43.6% 胜率
VS
孤猎 vs 悖论对线 - 56.4%胜率
孤猎
56.4% 胜率

悖论 vs 孤猎对线谁赢?

孤猎赢得悖论 vs 孤猎对线
获胜者
孤猎
比赛: 3,195
43.6%
胜率
56.4%
4.5
场均击杀
7.4
5.5
场均死亡
6.2
9.9
场均助攻
9.7
34,602
场均净资产
36,188
27,679
玩家伤害
29,463
3,785
目标伤害
3,898
65.0
补刀
50.1

悖论 vs 孤猎 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 孤猎 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 3,195 recent matches analyzed, 孤猎 wins with a 56.4% win rate compared to 悖论's 43.6%, giving 孤猎 a 12.8 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where 孤猎 consistently outperforms. 孤猎 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

悖论 vs 孤猎 战斗分析

孤猎 wins combat stats against 悖论 in Deadlock

孤猎 claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the 悖论 vs 孤猎 matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 3,195 ranked games reveals 孤猎 consistently outperforms 悖论 in direct combat scenarios. While 悖论 manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors 孤猎 in fights. 悖论 players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where 孤猎 dominates.

KDA比率
2.60悖论
2.76孤猎
孤猎 holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 2.76 compared to 悖论's 2.60. While this 0.16 point difference indicates 孤猎 tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled 悖论 players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. 悖论 should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor 孤猎's superior sustain.
平均击杀
4.5悖论
7.4孤猎
孤猎 substantially outfrags 悖论 in this matchup, averaging 7.4 kills compared to 4.5 — a difference of nearly 2.9 eliminations per match. When 孤猎 faces 悖论, the data clearly shows 孤猎 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 悖论 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 孤猎 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
5.5悖论
6.2孤猎
悖论 survives longer in this matchup, dying 5.5 times per game compared to 孤猎's 6.2 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means 悖论 is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. 孤猎 players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests 悖论's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
玩家伤害
27,679悖论
29,463孤猎
孤猎 applies 1,785 more damage per game than 悖论 in this matchup (29,463 vs 27,679). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: 孤猎 contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. 悖论 can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
目标伤害
3,785悖论
3,898孤猎
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (3,785) and 孤猎 (3,898). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 孤猎 经济分析

净资产
34,602悖论
36,188孤猎
补刀
65.0悖论
50.1孤猎

孤猎 generates approximately 1,586 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 孤猎 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (65.0 vs 50.1), while 悖论 leads in denies (2.3 vs 1.6). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 孤猎 推荐装备

悖论 build for 孤猎 matchup

悖论对战孤猎装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 孤猎 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 56.4% win rate disadvantage against 孤猎, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 元灵燃烧, 秘术管道, 玻璃大炮, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 41,999 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

孤猎 build for 悖论 matchup

孤猎对战悖论装备

孤猎's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 孤猎, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 幸运一击, 空尖弹, 玻璃大炮, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 38,400 souls Understanding 孤猎's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于3,195场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战孤猎进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对40名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是门侍,胜率51.8%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率34.8%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6860)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
47.76%4,1162.784.45.228,32235,281
37.53%4,0902.553.74.924,12134,382
36.44%4,0892.683.74.724,48734,190
42.86%3,9832.724.45.227,50135,077
42.36%3,8602.783.84.727,38433,988
46.42%3,8452.804.25.027,56334,970
34.79%3,5902.634.05.025,46434,628
45.50%3,2532.864.24.926,76934,991
43.60%3,1952.604.55.527,67934,602
43.24%3,1872.754.35.127,58634,888
44.89%3,0992.714.25.127,02335,388
35.37%3,0762.643.94.824,34734,750
49.37%2,8782.884.55.127,71335,560
45.91%2,8622.724.35.327,26135,116
45.81%2,8162.824.35.026,87034,723
47.88%2,8092.994.44.726,78535,310
44.57%2,7372.694.05.026,42834,742
47.83%2,6952.884.35.026,70935,607
46.70%2,6642.794.55.126,95235,402
41.58%2,6242.924.34.927,30935,841
39.98%2,4942.654.15.227,46235,182
48.45%2,4772.844.45.227,36935,851
48.36%2,4132.834.24.926,65034,961
44.19%2,3512.764.35.126,72335,040
44.22%2,2392.794.04.826,85235,100
48.57%2,1722.824.55.328,24635,934
49.10%2,0102.814.55.127,70635,367
42.56%2,0022.854.24.927,17534,708
49.32%1,8352.854.45.027,54635,735
41.03%1,8282.784.14.927,25134,895
46.14%1,6972.964.65.028,21836,042
47.75%1,6882.764.55.228,84134,778
42.71%1,6042.763.74.624,98035,307
43.79%1,4342.764.25.027,89635,012
41.27%1,4322.814.04.827,73734,753
48.42%1,4272.784.55.327,44335,411
38.15%1,4182.583.74.824,44733,080
48.11%1,4052.924.24.726,65135,367
47.15%1,3682.974.14.624,53734,138
44.09%1,3452.983.94.425,74535,282
51.75%1,3413.034.54.927,71836,562
51.42%1,2333.034.14.627,45135,417
50.36%9853.044.14.725,30734,739
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗门侍,达到51.8%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有34.8%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和40个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。