
Cassiopeiavs Brand
Cassiopeia vs Brand is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Brand wins with a 52.9% win rate (+5.9%) over Cassiopeia based on 17 games. Brand wins the early laning phase while Cassiopeia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Brand Matchup?

Cassiopeia vs Brand Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 52.9% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 47.1%, giving Brand a 5.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Brand controls the early laning stage, but Cassiopeia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Brand needs to press advantages before Cassiopeia reaches their power spikes, while Cassiopeia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Cassiopeia leads by 358 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Brand is slightly favored, Cassiopeia can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Brand's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Brand Laning Phase Breakdown
Brand is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Brand holds advantages in damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Brand
Swiftmarch is the optimal boots choice against Brand, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Brand are Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Brand. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Brand can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 54.5% win rate — 9.1 points above Brand. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Brand must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Cassiopeia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Cassiopeia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Brand
The Sorcery and Resolve rune setup gives Cassiopeia the best tools to compete against Brand in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.54% | 61 | 6.3 | 835 | 12,011 | 64.0% | 36.1% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 6.8 | 913 | 12,152 | 52.6% | 51.9% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 6.7 | 894 | 10,720 | 47.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 6.5 | 776 | 11,981 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 6.6 | 858 | 10,851 | 38.1% | 63.6% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.3 | 812 | 10,571 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 7.1 | 968 | 10,348 | 54.5% | 44.4% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 5.9 | 771 | 12,569 | 60.0% | 38.1% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 6.7 | 921 | 11,762 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.7 | 843 | 12,319 | 53.3% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.9 | 740 | 11,662 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.1 | 884 | 11,047 | 70.0% | 61.5% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.1 | 787 | 10,814 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.2 | 741 | 10,910 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 6.5 | 811 | 12,229 | 50.0% | 21.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.6 | 669 | 9,969 | 27.3% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 7.0 | 956 | 12,822 | 80.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 5.7 | 771 | 11,603 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.8 | 724 | 11,518 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.4 | 749 | 10,423 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.4 | 893 | 11,549 | 70.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.8 | 858 | 11,943 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.5 | 925 | 11,500 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.8 | 774 | 10,920 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 82.35% | 17 | 6.7 | 891 | 11,594 | 88.9% | 75.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.0 | 864 | 12,190 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.6 | 882 | 12,072 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 835 | 12,460 | 0.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 815 | 12,128 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.5 | 793 | 9,648 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.6 | 718 | 11,583 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.6 | 888 | 8,746 | 77.8% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 7.0 | 965 | 13,939 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.6 | 944 | 13,076 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 910 | 10,994 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.4 | 1,040 | 12,890 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.6 | 791 | 13,559 | 100.0% | 27.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 746 | 11,841 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 6.2 | 786 | 12,089 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.0 | 850 | 11,825 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.7 | 903 | 13,107 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.4 | 746 | 11,720 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.5 | 960 | 14,270 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 726 | 10,424 | 28.6% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 984 | 14,522 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 6.3 | 653 | 8,764 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 872 | 11,904 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.3 | 724 | 12,713 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.4 | 1,278 | 12,869 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.4 | 776 | 11,325 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.5 | 887 | 12,685 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.4 | 937 | 14,897 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.3 | 802 | 13,090 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 843 | 12,217 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 892 | 12,356 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 7.2 | 924 | 14,448 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.2 | 771 | 11,594 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 6.8 | 916 | 11,035 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.0 | 860 | 11,651 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.9 | 738 | 8,495 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.5 | 926 | 13,985 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 873 | 13,102 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.8 | 635 | 10,697 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 765 | 12,039 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.7 | 653 | 10,177 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.5 | 998 | 12,680 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 675 | 11,352 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.4 | 1,034 | 13,862 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 8.1 | 765 | 11,226 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,365 | 11,712 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 725 | 8,657 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 684 | 10,127 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 1,044 | 10,500 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 879 | 10,244 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 783 | 9,079 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.8 | 896 | 13,847 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 714 | 11,229 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Brand - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Brand in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup with a 52.9% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 47.1%, a 5.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Cassiopeia do against Brand in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Brand in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to 45.5%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 52.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 5.9 percentage point advantage means Brand is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Brand?
The best Cassiopeia build against Brand includes Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Seraph's Embrace with Swiftmarch. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Brand?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Brand use the Sorcery primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Brand matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Brand?
No, Cassiopeia struggles against Brand with only a 47.1% win rate. Brand has the advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Brand's lead.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Brand?
When playing Cassiopeia against Brand, play cautiously and avoid Brand's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Brand in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
