Ekkovs Fizz
Ekko vs Fizz is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.13. Ekko wins with a 51.6% win rate (+3.2%) over Fizz based on 31 games. Ekko wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ekko vs Fizz matchup.
Ekko Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ekko performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Ekko vs Fizz Matchup?
Ekko vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Ekko vs Fizz matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 31 recent matches analyzed, Ekko wins with a 51.6% win rate compared to Fizz's 48.4%, giving Ekko a 3.2 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ekko controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ekko needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ekko leads by 430 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ekko has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Fizz's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ekko vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Ekko is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Ekko holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ekko Build Against Fizz
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Ekko needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ekko against Fizz are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Ekko an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ekko vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ekko61.5%
Fizz38.5%Ekko44.4%Fizz55.6%Ekko dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 61.5% win rate — a 23.1 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Ekko can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 55.6% win rate — 11.1 points above Ekko. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Ekko must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Fizz reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Fizz survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Ekko Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Ekko to press their advantage against Fizz, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Ekko matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.13. The table below shows Ekko's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.55% | 154 | 4.9 | 920 | 12,431 | 50.7% | 58.0% | |
| 55.07% | 69 | 3.5 | 906 | 13,241 | 57.1% | 53.7% | |
| 44.83% | 58 | 5.9 | 814 | 12,326 | 44.4% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 1.1 | 699 | 12,576 | 44.0% | 54.8% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.9 | 860 | 11,401 | 46.1% | 53.9% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 1.2 | 746 | 12,757 | 54.5% | 53.6% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 2.9 | 695 | 11,956 | 39.3% | 55.6% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 3.1 | 745 | 12,297 | 43.8% | 44.8% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 1.1 | 671 | 11,326 | 60.0% | 45.8% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 5.1 | 737 | 11,191 | 40.0% | 55.0% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.2 | 669 | 12,499 | 52.9% | 38.1% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 1.3 | 671 | 12,018 | 31.3% | 52.4% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 6.2 | 800 | 12,523 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 1.5 | 730 | 13,899 | 38.5% | 45.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.4 | 747 | 13,247 | 42.9% | 61.1% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.2 | 755 | 10,880 | 41.2% | 57.1% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.7 | 920 | 12,824 | 61.5% | 44.4% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 1.1 | 661 | 12,077 | 64.3% | 47.1% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 1.0 | 720 | 14,043 | 75.0% | 31.8% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 1.4 | 779 | 13,026 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 6.2 | 835 | 13,042 | 54.5% | 55.6% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.0 | 785 | 12,159 | 20.0% | 58.8% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.2 | 893 | 12,071 | 57.1% | 53.9% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 5.4 | 777 | 11,980 | 50.0% | 55.0% | |
| 24.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 606 | 11,100 | 28.6% | 18.2% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 774 | 11,538 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.3 | 865 | 12,494 | 37.5% | 46.7% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 1.2 | 645 | 11,995 | 78.6% | 55.6% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.2 | 707 | 12,990 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 847 | 12,379 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 829 | 12,780 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 1.1 | 571 | 11,063 | 45.5% | 11.1% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.2 | 819 | 11,823 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.3 | 698 | 12,799 | 66.7% | 10.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.9 | 612 | 9,843 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.2 | 847 | 12,622 | 85.7% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.7 | 731 | 11,911 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 2.8 | 720 | 13,205 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.5 | 843 | 14,018 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.4 | 836 | 11,485 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.3 | 742 | 11,483 | 44.4% | 37.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.8 | 1,044 | 12,792 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.6 | 850 | 11,990 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.2 | 662 | 13,905 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 5.8 | 741 | 12,309 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.5 | 659 | 11,373 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.8 | 939 | 14,020 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.7 | 927 | 13,318 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.0 | 882 | 12,066 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.4 | 772 | 10,441 | 42.9% | 16.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.1 | 886 | 14,911 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.3 | 701 | 11,689 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.3 | 716 | 9,636 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.4 | 722 | 13,874 | 57.1% | 80.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.6 | 750 | 13,147 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 3.0 | 825 | 14,514 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 0.9 | 549 | 9,607 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.5 | 697 | 11,610 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 715 | 12,067 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 7.2 | 801 | 12,453 | 33.3% | 28.6% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.7 | 692 | 13,449 | 80.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.3 | 729 | 15,024 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.1 | 879 | 14,846 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.7 | 518 | 9,981 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 764 | 10,066 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.6 | 849 | 13,594 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 0.9 | 601 | 12,435 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 864 | 11,818 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 1,063 | 14,755 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 1,022 | 14,664 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.2 | 687 | 12,731 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.1 | 798 | 12,336 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.2 | 631 | 11,093 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.9 | 838 | 14,080 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.5 | 888 | 12,954 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.0 | 757 | 11,320 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.9 | 899 | 12,579 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 592 | 12,863 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.6 | 1,130 | 14,443 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 735 | 11,551 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.0 | 703 | 13,751 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 856 | 15,029 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 592 | 9,445 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 712 | 12,545 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 672 | 12,653 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 906 | 14,562 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 760 | 12,104 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 794 | 12,043 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 848 | 11,837 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.4 | 927 | 10,947 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 635 | 14,377 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 1,013 | 14,802 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ekko vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ekko do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Ekko wins the Ekko vs Fizz matchup with a 51.6% win rate compared to Fizz's 48.4%, a 3.2 percentage point difference. This data is based on 31 recent ranked games in patch 26.13.
How does Ekko do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Ekko has the advantage against Fizz with a 61.5% win rate versus 38.5%. Ekko players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ekko do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Ekko vs Fizz matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to 44.4%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ekko vs Fizz matchup?
Ekko wins the matchup against Fizz with a 51.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.13. The 3.2 percentage point advantage means Ekko is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 31 games analyzed.
What is the best Ekko build against Fizz?
The best Ekko build against Fizz includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Rabadon's Deathcap with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ekko runes against Fizz?
The best Ekko runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 55.6% win rate in the Ekko vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ekko counter Fizz?
Yes, Ekko has a favorable matchup against Fizz with a 51.6% win rate. Ekko has a solid advantage over Fizz in lane based on current patch 26.13 data.
How do I play Ekko against Fizz?
When playing Ekko against Fizz, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.