Ekkovs Fizz
Ekko vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Fizz wins with a 59.7% win rate (+19.4%) over Ekko based on 136 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ekko vs Fizz matchup.
Ekko Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ekko performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Fizz(40.3%)Who Wins the Ekko vs Fizz Matchup?
Ekko vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Ekko vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 136 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 59.7% win rate compared to Ekko's 40.3%, giving Fizz a 19.4 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ekko players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ekko leads by 375 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ekko vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Ekko is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ekko holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ekko Build Against Fizz
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Ekko needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ekko against Fizz are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Ekko an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 83.3% win rate across 6 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ekko vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ekko36.7%Fizz63.3%Ekko43.2%Fizz56.8%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 63.3% win rate — a 26.7 percentage point lead over Ekko. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 56.8% win rate — 13.5 points above Ekko. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ekko players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Ekko Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Ekko the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Ekko matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Ekko's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.13% | 231 | 1.2 | 727 | 13,347 | 45.3% | 51.9% | |
| 52.00% | 225 | 6.5 | 822 | 12,409 | 51.0% | 52.8% | |
| 52.38% | 190 | 6.3 | 843 | 12,525 | 51.7% | 52.9% | |
| 49.36% | 157 | 1.3 | 724 | 13,209 | 53.5% | 45.9% | |
| 49.66% | 149 | 1.3 | 794 | 14,533 | 51.8% | 48.3% | |
| 48.61% | 144 | 6.4 | 866 | 12,647 | 52.2% | 45.5% | |
| 47.92% | 144 | 4.0 | 861 | 12,938 | 47.5% | 48.2% | |
| 42.86% | 141 | 1.2 | 682 | 12,762 | 38.2% | 47.2% | |
| 55.40% | 139 | 1.1 | 731 | 13,428 | 58.3% | 53.2% | |
| 44.85% | 138 | 1.3 | 723 | 12,969 | 51.4% | 37.5% | |
| 59.26% | 136 | 6.2 | 929 | 12,059 | 58.2% | 60.7% | |
| 40.30% | 136 | 4.5 | 760 | 12,647 | 36.7% | 43.2% | |
| 46.56% | 134 | 3.2 | 753 | 12,818 | 51.5% | 41.5% | |
| 48.48% | 132 | 1.1 | 677 | 12,556 | 55.0% | 43.1% | |
| 55.04% | 129 | 6.5 | 822 | 13,263 | 58.5% | 52.6% | |
| 52.21% | 114 | 6.4 | 825 | 12,993 | 52.3% | 52.2% | |
| 52.25% | 111 | 3.5 | 778 | 12,961 | 54.0% | 50.8% | |
| 54.13% | 111 | 5.6 | 849 | 12,995 | 53.5% | 54.5% | |
| 48.04% | 103 | 1.3 | 811 | 13,314 | 48.9% | 47.4% | |
| 64.71% | 102 | 6.2 | 881 | 13,295 | 73.8% | 58.3% | |
| 43.56% | 101 | 1.4 | 888 | 12,704 | 36.7% | 50.0% | |
| 47.00% | 101 | 5.9 | 823 | 12,397 | 51.3% | 44.3% | |
| 45.92% | 99 | 1.2 | 776 | 13,353 | 59.6% | 33.3% | |
| 62.24% | 99 | 6.5 | 926 | 12,571 | 64.0% | 60.4% | |
| 43.75% | 99 | 1.2 | 710 | 13,419 | 43.6% | 43.9% | |
| 47.96% | 99 | 1.0 | 731 | 12,792 | 50.0% | 46.0% | |
| 59.38% | 96 | 1.2 | 734 | 12,458 | 58.5% | 60.5% | |
| 37.23% | 94 | 6.0 | 781 | 12,313 | 41.5% | 34.0% | |
| 63.04% | 92 | 1.3 | 761 | 13,618 | 57.9% | 66.7% | |
| 62.22% | 91 | 6.3 | 818 | 12,291 | 63.6% | 60.9% | |
| 53.01% | 84 | 1.1 | 722 | 13,078 | 52.5% | 53.5% | |
| 45.12% | 83 | 6.3 | 825 | 11,908 | 46.1% | 44.2% | |
| 48.19% | 83 | 1.4 | 728 | 13,707 | 39.3% | 52.7% | |
| 51.85% | 82 | 1.4 | 886 | 14,309 | 69.7% | 39.6% | |
| 41.25% | 81 | 4.4 | 801 | 12,518 | 40.5% | 41.9% | |
| 48.05% | 77 | 3.1 | 769 | 13,778 | 35.7% | 55.1% | |
| 50.00% | 76 | 1.2 | 769 | 14,010 | 61.8% | 40.5% | |
| 56.76% | 74 | 6.1 | 749 | 12,086 | 57.1% | 56.4% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.1 | 776 | 13,274 | 46.9% | 47.6% | |
| 48.65% | 74 | 6.3 | 812 | 12,500 | 45.2% | 51.2% | |
| 42.47% | 74 | 6.1 | 777 | 12,667 | 53.1% | 34.1% | |
| 49.32% | 73 | 6.2 | 807 | 12,680 | 37.1% | 60.5% | |
| 52.86% | 70 | 1.4 | 770 | 12,781 | 41.2% | 63.9% | |
| 50.72% | 69 | 6.7 | 792 | 12,971 | 51.9% | 50.0% | |
| 51.47% | 68 | 1.4 | 779 | 14,019 | 65.4% | 42.9% | |
| 58.46% | 66 | 2.2 | 722 | 13,249 | 57.7% | 59.0% | |
| 46.03% | 65 | 1.2 | 782 | 13,187 | 45.5% | 46.7% | |
| 41.27% | 63 | 1.2 | 708 | 12,798 | 48.3% | 35.3% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 1.2 | 809 | 14,157 | 65.4% | 42.9% | |
| 45.76% | 59 | 1.3 | 708 | 13,012 | 50.0% | 41.4% | |
| 52.63% | 57 | 1.1 | 675 | 12,452 | 54.8% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 1.6 | 834 | 12,724 | 53.1% | 40.0% | |
| 59.65% | 57 | 6.5 | 788 | 12,373 | 72.4% | 46.4% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 3.0 | 806 | 13,225 | 40.7% | 41.4% | |
| 51.85% | 55 | 6.1 | 891 | 13,615 | 70.6% | 43.2% | |
| 44.90% | 50 | 4.0 | 782 | 13,713 | 55.0% | 37.9% | |
| 42.86% | 50 | 1.1 | 717 | 12,423 | 58.3% | 28.0% | |
| 63.27% | 49 | 4.6 | 790 | 13,191 | 70.0% | 58.6% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 6.7 | 935 | 12,032 | 63.0% | 52.4% | |
| 47.83% | 47 | 6.4 | 805 | 12,029 | 58.3% | 36.4% | |
| 57.78% | 46 | 6.9 | 941 | 12,570 | 73.9% | 40.9% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 5.8 | 793 | 10,890 | 56.0% | 33.3% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 1.5 | 786 | 13,485 | 52.4% | 44.0% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.5 | 857 | 13,309 | 76.2% | 37.5% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 1.4 | 724 | 11,830 | 34.6% | 50.0% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 2.1 | 754 | 13,567 | 37.5% | 53.6% | |
| 64.29% | 42 | 1.4 | 791 | 14,557 | 79.0% | 52.2% | |
| 64.29% | 42 | 6.8 | 837 | 12,527 | 64.0% | 64.7% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 6.4 | 923 | 12,709 | 36.8% | 50.0% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 4.4 | 806 | 13,162 | 41.2% | 52.2% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 4.4 | 1,010 | 13,687 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 2.9 | 848 | 12,572 | 46.7% | 47.8% | |
| 61.11% | 37 | 1.1 | 826 | 13,801 | 61.9% | 60.0% | |
| 54.29% | 36 | 6.4 | 803 | 13,564 | 75.0% | 43.5% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.0 | 877 | 12,886 | 46.7% | 55.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 1.2 | 721 | 13,992 | 58.3% | 54.5% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 2.5 | 695 | 13,433 | 76.9% | 38.1% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 1.4 | 706 | 11,342 | 55.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 6.2 | 809 | 11,720 | 53.3% | 31.6% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 1.9 | 780 | 13,893 | 61.5% | 63.2% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 0.9 | 721 | 11,674 | 52.6% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 1.4 | 662 | 13,077 | 77.8% | 38.1% | |
| 46.43% | 29 | 4.0 | 703 | 11,976 | 46.1% | 46.7% | |
| 67.86% | 28 | 1.7 | 801 | 13,647 | 69.2% | 66.7% | |
| 62.96% | 28 | 2.4 | 806 | 13,081 | 53.9% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.4 | 807 | 12,448 | 66.7% | 46.1% | |
| 57.69% | 27 | 6.7 | 794 | 12,115 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.9 | 801 | 13,995 | 53.9% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 1.8 | 877 | 15,686 | 57.1% | 61.1% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 3.2 | 766 | 12,579 | 64.3% | 54.5% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.8 | 720 | 11,788 | 46.7% | 44.4% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.0 | 842 | 12,463 | 63.6% | 41.7% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.8 | 844 | 13,931 | 33.3% | 53.3% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 1.3 | 769 | 12,518 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.8 | 1,035 | 13,455 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.7 | 740 | 11,690 | 62.5% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.8 | 768 | 13,876 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 4.6 | 787 | 13,162 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.6 | 701 | 10,884 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.8 | 833 | 13,046 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.0 | 856 | 12,124 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.6 | 691 | 12,314 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.4 | 931 | 14,136 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.8 | 781 | 11,440 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.2 | 951 | 12,799 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.6 | 801 | 11,531 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.3 | 837 | 11,376 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.4 | 699 | 11,359 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.2 | 776 | 13,406 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 799 | 13,140 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 868 | 13,575 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 741 | 9,745 | 16.7% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 630 | 12,273 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.1 | 904 | 12,075 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.5 | 717 | 14,821 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.5 | 713 | 13,281 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.6 | 896 | 12,881 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 825 | 11,854 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.9 | 686 | 8,008 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 854 | 13,084 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.1 | 665 | 14,101 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 941 | 16,454 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 977 | 14,448 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 953 | 14,475 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 684 | 11,785 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 824 | 13,100 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.7 | 882 | 11,132 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 741 | 9,592 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 775 | 11,592 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 707 | 14,127 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 536 | 5,258 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 609 | 12,329 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 673 | 11,737 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ekko vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ekko do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Ekko vs Fizz matchup with a 59.7% win rate compared to Ekko's 40.3%, a 19.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 136 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Ekko do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Ekko with a 63.3% win rate versus 36.7%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ekko do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Ekko vs Fizz matchup with a 56.8% win rate compared to 43.2%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ekko vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Ekko with a 59.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 19.4 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 136 games analyzed.
What is the best Ekko build against Fizz?
The best Ekko build against Fizz includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Rabadon's Deathcap with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 83.3% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ekko runes against Fizz?
The best Ekko runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 47.6% win rate in the Ekko vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ekko counter Fizz?
No, Ekko struggles against Fizz with only a 40.3% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Ekko against Fizz?
When playing Ekko against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.