Ekkovs Fizz
Ekko vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Ekko wins with a 53.8% win rate (+7.6%) over Fizz based on 145 games. Ekko holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ekko vs Fizz matchup.
Ekko Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ekko performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Ekko vs Fizz Matchup?
Ekko vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Ekko vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 145 recent matches analyzed, Ekko wins with a 53.8% win rate compared to Fizz's 46.2%, giving Ekko a 7.6 percentage point advantage. Ekko dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Fizz players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ekko leads by 444 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ekko players can confidently pick into Fizz and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Fizz away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ekko vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Ekko is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Ekko holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ekko Build Against Fizz
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Ekko needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ekko against Fizz are Shadowflame, Lich Bane and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Ekko an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ekko vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ekko50.0%
Fizz50.0%Ekko57.0%Fizz43.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Ekko and Fizz, with Ekko holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Ekko is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.0% win rate — 13.9 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Ekko, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Ekko holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Fizz players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Ekko Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Ekko to press their advantage against Fizz, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Ekko matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Ekko's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.41% | 207 | 6.3 | 819 | 11,945 | 43.0% | 47.7% | |
| 46.59% | 176 | 6.4 | 822 | 12,391 | 50.7% | 43.7% | |
| 50.31% | 159 | 6.0 | 802 | 11,640 | 42.9% | 57.3% | |
| 47.77% | 157 | 5.7 | 819 | 12,379 | 45.3% | 49.5% | |
| 53.79% | 145 | 5.8 | 856 | 11,764 | 50.0% | 57.0% | |
| 47.48% | 139 | 4.1 | 889 | 12,889 | 42.3% | 50.6% | |
| 47.76% | 134 | 4.0 | 796 | 12,458 | 48.1% | 47.5% | |
| 52.99% | 134 | 1.2 | 761 | 13,650 | 51.1% | 54.0% | |
| 58.78% | 131 | 1.2 | 657 | 12,435 | 62.5% | 55.2% | |
| 47.33% | 131 | 6.1 | 917 | 13,487 | 47.7% | 47.1% | |
| 49.22% | 128 | 1.2 | 714 | 12,224 | 53.7% | 46.0% | |
| 43.65% | 126 | 1.4 | 732 | 11,947 | 45.0% | 42.4% | |
| 48.39% | 124 | 1.2 | 740 | 12,193 | 48.4% | 48.4% | |
| 46.72% | 122 | 1.2 | 682 | 12,083 | 52.4% | 40.7% | |
| 57.02% | 121 | 6.1 | 790 | 12,286 | 53.1% | 59.7% | |
| 44.17% | 120 | 6.2 | 825 | 11,956 | 49.1% | 40.3% | |
| 52.10% | 119 | 6.0 | 829 | 11,588 | 50.8% | 53.5% | |
| 52.14% | 117 | 2.3 | 753 | 11,996 | 49.2% | 55.8% | |
| 48.28% | 116 | 1.1 | 679 | 12,815 | 51.9% | 45.3% | |
| 50.00% | 114 | 6.0 | 890 | 12,198 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.28% | 103 | 5.9 | 821 | 12,455 | 61.4% | 54.2% | |
| 43.00% | 100 | 1.1 | 663 | 12,224 | 46.7% | 40.0% | |
| 45.36% | 97 | 3.8 | 771 | 11,868 | 44.4% | 46.1% | |
| 49.47% | 95 | 6.4 | 829 | 11,546 | 51.9% | 46.3% | |
| 47.78% | 90 | 1.4 | 707 | 13,596 | 58.6% | 42.6% | |
| 53.41% | 88 | 1.3 | 696 | 12,762 | 48.8% | 57.8% | |
| 35.53% | 76 | 3.4 | 720 | 12,399 | 43.2% | 28.2% | |
| 53.95% | 76 | 6.2 | 812 | 12,141 | 54.8% | 53.3% | |
| 44.74% | 76 | 5.2 | 856 | 12,671 | 40.9% | 46.3% | |
| 53.33% | 75 | 6.0 | 774 | 11,581 | 54.5% | 52.4% | |
| 67.12% | 73 | 6.0 | 836 | 12,098 | 54.5% | 77.5% | |
| 51.47% | 68 | 1.1 | 695 | 12,239 | 57.6% | 45.7% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 6.3 | 1,018 | 12,348 | 72.4% | 47.4% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 1.4 | 779 | 13,677 | 53.6% | 61.5% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 1.4 | 649 | 11,907 | 34.4% | 58.8% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 6.0 | 971 | 12,460 | 62.5% | 44.1% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 6.3 | 877 | 12,769 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 6.0 | 825 | 12,442 | 48.1% | 46.0% | |
| 52.38% | 63 | 6.2 | 789 | 12,972 | 58.6% | 47.1% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.2 | 700 | 12,906 | 46.7% | 40.0% | |
| 37.29% | 59 | 6.1 | 860 | 12,072 | 31.8% | 40.5% | |
| 50.88% | 57 | 5.8 | 830 | 12,089 | 60.7% | 41.4% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.1 | 914 | 13,064 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 6.1 | 793 | 12,598 | 70.6% | 38.2% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 6.3 | 900 | 12,118 | 55.6% | 48.5% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 6.0 | 802 | 11,559 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 1.2 | 734 | 13,350 | 52.6% | 36.7% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 6.1 | 864 | 13,121 | 63.2% | 43.3% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.1 | 723 | 12,959 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.2 | 708 | 13,819 | 55.6% | 51.6% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 6.1 | 718 | 10,216 | 48.0% | 56.5% | |
| 65.96% | 47 | 6.3 | 815 | 11,757 | 66.7% | 65.4% | |
| 60.00% | 45 | 5.0 | 891 | 12,317 | 60.9% | 59.1% | |
| 43.18% | 44 | 1.7 | 793 | 12,960 | 36.0% | 52.6% | |
| 62.79% | 43 | 3.8 | 775 | 13,271 | 71.4% | 54.5% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 1.4 | 746 | 12,824 | 50.0% | 65.0% | |
| 38.46% | 39 | 1.2 | 730 | 12,946 | 42.9% | 36.0% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 6.5 | 738 | 11,375 | 35.3% | 47.6% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.3 | 763 | 13,989 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 2.1 | 769 | 13,688 | 57.9% | 66.7% | |
| 36.11% | 36 | 1.2 | 714 | 11,520 | 27.3% | 50.0% | |
| 69.44% | 36 | 6.8 | 923 | 12,104 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 65.71% | 35 | 1.3 | 760 | 13,348 | 93.3% | 45.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.7 | 661 | 12,632 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.4 | 666 | 12,169 | 41.2% | 47.1% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 2.1 | 802 | 12,909 | 55.6% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 4.3 | 803 | 12,522 | 53.3% | 47.1% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 5.1 | 755 | 11,266 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 3.8 | 716 | 12,714 | 46.1% | 33.3% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.4 | 928 | 13,498 | 66.7% | 42.1% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 1.9 | 828 | 12,394 | 56.3% | 64.3% | |
| 33.33% | 30 | 2.8 | 665 | 13,323 | 55.6% | 23.8% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 1.5 | 648 | 11,462 | 60.0% | 38.5% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.0 | 878 | 12,664 | 66.7% | 52.6% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 1.2 | 864 | 14,735 | 70.0% | 37.5% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 2.4 | 871 | 12,632 | 68.8% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 4.5 | 909 | 11,959 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.3 | 1,011 | 13,998 | 44.4% | 73.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.2 | 731 | 12,115 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 4.7 | 801 | 12,860 | 33.3% | 30.8% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.7 | 917 | 12,436 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.4 | 1,031 | 13,849 | 50.0% | 69.2% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.4 | 833 | 13,904 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 3.6 | 837 | 12,212 | 75.0% | 38.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.6 | 758 | 13,374 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 3.4 | 936 | 13,138 | 36.4% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 21 | 6.0 | 897 | 11,568 | 100.0% | 53.9% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.8 | 913 | 13,388 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 1.2 | 598 | 11,353 | 27.3% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.6 | 674 | 12,810 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 5.3 | 896 | 13,497 | 80.0% | 46.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.4 | 728 | 14,233 | 80.0% | 42.9% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 1.0 | 724 | 13,548 | 87.5% | 54.5% | |
| 21.05% | 19 | 2.6 | 701 | 14,272 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.6 | 878 | 12,303 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 3.4 | 733 | 12,336 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 4.9 | 877 | 13,738 | 40.0% | 61.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 666 | 12,279 | 55.6% | 28.6% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.3 | 751 | 12,769 | 44.4% | 71.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 4.0 | 773 | 11,938 | 40.0% | 45.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 4.3 | 772 | 14,061 | 40.0% | 10.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.5 | 866 | 13,300 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.7 | 745 | 12,337 | 62.5% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.9 | 937 | 12,309 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.8 | 750 | 11,826 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 85.71% | 14 | 5.9 | 843 | 12,447 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 3.9 | 709 | 10,944 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.4 | 855 | 14,041 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 5.8 | 821 | 14,110 | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 727 | 13,594 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 986 | 15,409 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 673 | 9,396 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 640 | 11,837 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 969 | 13,751 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 818 | 11,199 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.8 | 695 | 11,075 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.4 | 640 | 10,677 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 683 | 9,874 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.8 | 826 | 14,732 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.4 | 1,001 | 12,749 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.3 | 583 | 9,487 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.8 | 644 | 12,987 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.2 | 811 | 11,038 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.9 | 694 | 13,890 | 0.0% | 14.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.7 | 1,025 | 13,345 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.1 | 842 | 14,413 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 960 | 13,161 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.2 | 859 | 14,486 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 842 | 10,356 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.3 | 818 | 12,638 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,004 | 11,625 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 742 | 12,604 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 909 | 14,357 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 983 | 13,973 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 582 | 9,436 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ekko vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ekko do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Ekko wins the Ekko vs Fizz matchup with a 53.8% win rate compared to Fizz's 46.2%, a 7.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 145 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Ekko do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Ekko has the advantage against Fizz with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Ekko players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ekko do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Ekko takes over the Ekko vs Fizz matchup with a 57.0% win rate compared to 43.0%. Ekko scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ekko vs Fizz matchup?
Ekko wins the matchup against Fizz with a 53.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 7.6 percentage point advantage means Ekko is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 145 games analyzed.
What is the best Ekko build against Fizz?
The best Ekko build against Fizz includes Shadowflame, Lich Bane, Rabadon's Deathcap with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ekko runes against Fizz?
The best Ekko runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 56.5% win rate in the Ekko vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ekko counter Fizz?
Yes, Ekko has a favorable matchup against Fizz with a 53.8% win rate. Ekko strongly counters Fizz in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Ekko against Fizz?
When playing Ekko against Fizz, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.