
Fiddlesticksvs Zac
Fiddlesticks vs Zac is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Zac wins with a 70.0% win rate (+40.0%) over Fiddlesticks based on 20 games. Zac holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fiddlesticks build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup.
Fiddlesticks Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fiddlesticks performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fiddlesticks vs Zac Matchup?

Fiddlesticks vs Zac Matchup Summary
The Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 20 recent matches analyzed, Zac wins with a 70.0% win rate compared to Fiddlesticks's 30.0%, giving Zac a 40.0 percentage point advantage. Zac dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Fiddlesticks players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 2,117 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Zac has a strong advantage in this matchup. Fiddlesticks players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Zac overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fiddlesticks vs Zac Laning Phase Breakdown
Fiddlesticks is favored during the laning phase against Zac, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Fiddlesticks holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fiddlesticks Build Against Zac
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Zac, providing the mobility and stats Fiddlesticks needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fiddlesticks against Zac are Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Fiddlesticks an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Zac. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Zac dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 88.9% win rate — a 77.8 percentage point lead over Fiddlesticks. This lopsided early game means Zac can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zac is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 54.5% win rate — 9.1 points above Fiddlesticks. Extended games heavily favor Zac, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Zac holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Fiddlesticks players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Fiddlesticks Runes Against Zac
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Fiddlesticks the best tools to compete against Zac in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fiddlesticks matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Fiddlesticks's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fiddlesticks build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.90% | 82 | 1.1 | 703 | 11,412 | 52.3% | 34.2% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 1.1 | 813 | 13,223 | 48.0% | 46.1% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 1.2 | 785 | 13,104 | 33.3% | 60.4% | |
| 64.41% | 59 | 0.9 | 723 | 12,357 | 60.9% | 66.7% | |
| 56.86% | 51 | 1.0 | 709 | 12,353 | 50.0% | 62.1% | |
| 60.00% | 50 | 1.1 | 786 | 13,671 | 53.3% | 62.9% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 1.1 | 778 | 12,603 | 28.6% | 59.3% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 1.1 | 719 | 12,277 | 50.0% | 43.5% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 1.1 | 785 | 11,892 | 60.0% | 35.0% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 1.0 | 808 | 13,559 | 58.3% | 54.2% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.2 | 832 | 13,012 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 1.1 | 775 | 13,166 | 57.1% | 39.1% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 1.8 | 684 | 12,050 | 42.9% | 43.8% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 1.4 | 849 | 10,973 | 43.8% | 30.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 1.7 | 786 | 11,392 | 30.8% | 57.1% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 1.2 | 810 | 12,999 | 53.9% | 76.9% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.3 | 747 | 12,401 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.0 | 672 | 12,168 | 63.6% | 46.1% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 1.1 | 801 | 14,213 | 40.0% | 31.6% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.0 | 711 | 12,159 | 53.9% | 40.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.0 | 799 | 12,327 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.3 | 819 | 13,706 | 57.1% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.2 | 693 | 11,043 | 60.0% | 41.7% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.0 | 763 | 13,365 | 60.0% | 43.8% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 813 | 10,825 | 11.1% | 45.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 0.9 | 840 | 12,512 | 37.5% | 45.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.3 | 708 | 12,191 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 3.4 | 795 | 12,497 | 71.4% | 41.7% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.8 | 773 | 11,661 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.1 | 757 | 12,902 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 2.3 | 936 | 13,851 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.3 | 839 | 12,608 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.8 | 787 | 12,637 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.7 | 681 | 9,446 | 83.3% | 44.4% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.0 | 723 | 9,500 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.5 | 926 | 13,362 | 33.3% | 87.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 2.1 | 777 | 13,075 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 1.9 | 697 | 12,142 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.8 | 828 | 11,204 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.0 | 637 | 11,973 | 85.7% | 28.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.2 | 780 | 13,069 | 100.0% | 30.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.1 | 784 | 12,121 | 14.3% | 66.7% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.9 | 632 | 10,245 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.3 | 719 | 11,520 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.4 | 694 | 12,603 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.4 | 948 | 11,991 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.6 | 813 | 11,877 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.0 | 763 | 10,902 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.2 | 840 | 14,792 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.6 | 629 | 8,692 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.7 | 665 | 8,968 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.0 | 564 | 10,586 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 694 | 10,821 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.9 | 587 | 9,567 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.6 | 838 | 11,979 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.1 | 614 | 12,245 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.5 | 696 | 9,419 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 981 | 13,856 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 904 | 10,568 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 750 | 11,445 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 793 | 11,055 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.6 | 788 | 9,822 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 3.2 | 621 | 8,910 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.0 | 729 | 12,737 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 681 | 9,318 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 697 | 8,755 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.1 | 778 | 11,993 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.2 | 1,122 | 16,967 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.5 | 891 | 8,692 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.6 | 710 | 8,740 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 603 | 8,961 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.2 | 772 | 9,275 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 0.9 | 855 | 13,270 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.2 | 609 | 10,332 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 613 | 9,529 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.3 | 780 | 9,972 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.3 | 746 | 10,965 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.3 | 738 | 8,395 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.2 | 817 | 9,416 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.4 | 590 | 9,829 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 724 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 1,092 | 11,225 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 745 | 11,020 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 894 | 12,018 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 870 | 10,510 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 575 | 10,121 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 965 | 11,875 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.0 | 856 | 11,414 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.9 | 741 | 12,634 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.6 | 942 | 10,307 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.0 | 1,005 | 9,687 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 628 | 8,789 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.5 | 715 | 9,970 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,093 | 12,757 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.7 | 613 | 7,786 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 569 | 8,686 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 578 | 8,801 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 577 | 10,521 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 699 | 9,814 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 788 | 11,539 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 886 | 10,587 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fiddlesticks vs Zac - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fiddlesticks do against Zac in League of Legends?
Zac wins the Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup with a 70.0% win rate compared to Fiddlesticks's 30.0%, a 40.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 20 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Fiddlesticks do against Zac in the early game?
In the early game, Zac has the advantage against Fiddlesticks with a 88.9% win rate versus 11.1%. Zac players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fiddlesticks do against Zac in the late game?
In the late game, Zac takes over the Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to 45.5%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup?
Zac wins the matchup against Fiddlesticks with a 70.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 40.0 percentage point advantage means Zac is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 20 games analyzed.
What is the best Fiddlesticks build against Zac?
The best Fiddlesticks build against Zac includes Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fiddlesticks runes against Zac?
The best Fiddlesticks runes against Zac use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fiddlesticks vs Zac matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fiddlesticks counter Zac?
No, Fiddlesticks struggles against Zac with only a 30.0% win rate. Zac has the advantage in this matchup. Fiddlesticks players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Zac's lead.
How do I play Fiddlesticks against Zac?
When playing Fiddlesticks against Zac, play cautiously and avoid Zac's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Zac has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.