
Gangplankvs Fizz
Gangplank vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 70.0% win rate (+40.0%) over Gangplank based on 20 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Gangplank build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup.
Gangplank Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Gangplank performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Gangplank vs Fizz Matchup?

Gangplank vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Gangplank vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 20 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 70.0% win rate compared to Gangplank's 30.0%, giving Fizz a 40.0 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Gangplank players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Gangplank leads by 128 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Gangplank players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Gangplank vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Gangplank is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Gangplank holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Gangplank Build Against Fizz
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Gangplank needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Gangplank against Fizz are Voltaic Cyclosword, The Collector and Essence Reaver. This combination gives Gangplank an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 4 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 80.0% win rate — a 60.0 percentage point lead over Gangplank. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Gangplank. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Gangplank players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Gangplank Runes Against Fizz
The Sorcery and Resolve rune setup gives Gangplank the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Gangplank matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Gangplank's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Gangplank build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.72% | 221 | 7.0 | 926 | 14,782 | 44.1% | 39.5% | |
| 47.64% | 191 | 7.2 | 1,030 | 13,721 | 46.0% | 48.7% | |
| 57.99% | 169 | 7.0 | 1,034 | 13,989 | 60.6% | 56.1% | |
| 45.78% | 166 | 6.7 | 927 | 13,155 | 49.1% | 43.9% | |
| 47.52% | 141 | 6.9 | 858 | 13,570 | 49.1% | 46.6% | |
| 44.44% | 126 | 7.1 | 1,161 | 13,494 | 40.0% | 46.9% | |
| 45.13% | 113 | 6.8 | 1,095 | 13,602 | 48.9% | 42.6% | |
| 48.65% | 111 | 6.8 | 958 | 12,720 | 41.3% | 53.9% | |
| 49.09% | 110 | 7.2 | 943 | 13,367 | 46.7% | 50.8% | |
| 54.72% | 106 | 7.2 | 1,010 | 13,589 | 53.9% | 55.6% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 7.1 | 1,055 | 14,389 | 58.3% | 52.4% | |
| 51.06% | 94 | 7.4 | 1,368 | 14,388 | 51.4% | 50.9% | |
| 48.31% | 89 | 7.0 | 1,017 | 13,540 | 50.0% | 46.8% | |
| 42.70% | 89 | 7.0 | 1,133 | 12,778 | 39.0% | 45.8% | |
| 45.45% | 88 | 6.9 | 972 | 12,768 | 42.9% | 47.2% | |
| 50.00% | 88 | 6.9 | 891 | 13,015 | 52.8% | 48.1% | |
| 51.22% | 82 | 6.9 | 1,077 | 13,565 | 51.7% | 50.9% | |
| 42.68% | 82 | 7.1 | 913 | 13,791 | 56.7% | 34.6% | |
| 59.76% | 82 | 6.9 | 1,026 | 14,118 | 71.0% | 52.9% | |
| 48.10% | 79 | 7.0 | 978 | 14,698 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 44.30% | 79 | 7.1 | 995 | 13,899 | 50.0% | 41.5% | |
| 56.58% | 76 | 6.9 | 1,100 | 14,270 | 60.7% | 54.2% | |
| 56.00% | 75 | 7.9 | 1,007 | 13,765 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 44.00% | 75 | 7.1 | 965 | 14,012 | 46.9% | 41.9% | |
| 48.61% | 72 | 7.1 | 1,096 | 13,204 | 48.1% | 48.9% | |
| 47.22% | 72 | 7.1 | 992 | 14,137 | 32.1% | 56.8% | |
| 53.85% | 65 | 6.9 | 1,126 | 13,294 | 53.9% | 53.9% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 7.0 | 998 | 12,949 | 52.0% | 46.1% | |
| 54.10% | 61 | 7.3 | 890 | 13,478 | 42.9% | 63.6% | |
| 41.38% | 58 | 7.1 | 993 | 13,842 | 30.8% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 6.5 | 1,163 | 13,482 | 41.7% | 51.5% | |
| 57.14% | 56 | 7.2 | 991 | 12,011 | 53.6% | 60.7% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 7.0 | 928 | 12,733 | 44.0% | 57.7% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 6.4 | 963 | 14,556 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 6.9 | 896 | 13,834 | 58.8% | 40.6% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 6.9 | 1,015 | 12,589 | 52.4% | 48.1% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 7.4 | 991 | 15,495 | 73.3% | 45.5% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 7.1 | 1,009 | 13,510 | 50.0% | 43.3% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 7.0 | 1,123 | 14,585 | 43.5% | 62.5% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 7.1 | 1,009 | 13,808 | 68.8% | 50.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 7.4 | 1,118 | 15,047 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 62.79% | 43 | 6.7 | 1,034 | 14,883 | 50.0% | 70.4% | |
| 37.50% | 40 | 6.7 | 980 | 13,311 | 36.4% | 37.9% | |
| 35.90% | 39 | 6.8 | 788 | 13,301 | 23.5% | 45.5% | |
| 63.16% | 38 | 6.9 | 983 | 12,711 | 47.6% | 82.3% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 7.4 | 840 | 13,255 | 55.6% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 7.0 | 854 | 13,024 | 56.3% | 61.1% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 7.1 | 1,095 | 14,178 | 14.3% | 63.2% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 7.0 | 1,037 | 14,207 | 54.5% | 54.5% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 7.3 | 875 | 12,664 | 35.7% | 26.7% | |
| 82.14% | 28 | 7.1 | 883 | 13,026 | 82.3% | 81.8% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 6.4 | 833 | 13,168 | 44.4% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 6.3 | 951 | 12,331 | 27.3% | 66.7% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 912 | 14,311 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 881 | 13,360 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.5 | 1,069 | 15,295 | 42.9% | 43.8% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 7.3 | 1,076 | 14,934 | 36.4% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.6 | 949 | 14,729 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 7.1 | 924 | 13,268 | 77.8% | 46.1% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 7.7 | 850 | 14,499 | 63.6% | 54.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 7.0 | 1,051 | 13,092 | 55.6% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 6.8 | 822 | 14,285 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.8 | 807 | 14,273 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 7.1 | 894 | 14,431 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.4 | 831 | 10,867 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 26.32% | 19 | 6.9 | 951 | 13,920 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 7.5 | 992 | 13,370 | 71.4% | 36.4% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.9 | 980 | 14,285 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 7.3 | 804 | 11,860 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.3 | 997 | 12,235 | 62.5% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 7.2 | 1,174 | 14,458 | 57.1% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.5 | 953 | 13,830 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,088 | 14,644 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 7.2 | 1,101 | 15,290 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.4 | 1,065 | 13,876 | 71.4% | 28.6% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.5 | 902 | 10,083 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.5 | 1,162 | 16,180 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.9 | 792 | 10,578 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.8 | 790 | 12,286 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 8.0 | 1,146 | 13,210 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 1,016 | 15,129 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.5 | 1,043 | 13,890 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.9 | 1,240 | 17,441 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.2 | 943 | 14,028 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 945 | 12,715 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 857 | 13,739 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.2 | 1,012 | 15,158 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 867 | 15,578 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 1,227 | 14,005 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.5 | 1,215 | 15,971 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 701 | 12,055 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.3 | 1,041 | 14,974 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.8 | 1,113 | 13,261 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 7.1 | 837 | 13,073 | 80.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.4 | 1,352 | 14,888 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.2 | 1,025 | 14,654 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.3 | 955 | 17,074 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 808 | 11,481 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 762 | 14,158 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.4 | 984 | 13,496 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.6 | 723 | 14,602 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 685 | 11,441 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Gangplank vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gangplank do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup with a 70.0% win rate compared to Gangplank's 30.0%, a 40.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 20 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Gangplank do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Gangplank with a 80.0% win rate versus 20.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Gangplank do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Gangplank with a 70.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 40.0 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 20 games analyzed.
What is the best Gangplank build against Fizz?
The best Gangplank build against Fizz includes Voltaic Cyclosword, The Collector, Essence Reaver with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Gangplank runes against Fizz?
The best Gangplank runes against Fizz use the Sorcery primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Gangplank counter Fizz?
No, Gangplank struggles against Fizz with only a 30.0% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Gangplank players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Gangplank against Fizz?
When playing Gangplank against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.