Gangplankvs Fizz
Gangplank vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.3. Gangplank wins with a 78.6% win rate (+57.1%) over Fizz based on 14 games. Gangplank holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Gangplank build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup.
Gangplank Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Gangplank performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Fizz(78.6%)Who Wins the Gangplank vs Fizz Matchup?
Gangplank vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Gangplank vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 14 recent matches analyzed, Gangplank wins with a 78.6% win rate compared to Fizz's 21.4%, giving Gangplank a 57.1 percentage point advantage. Gangplank dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Fizz players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Gangplank leads by 309 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Gangplank players can confidently pick into Fizz and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Fizz away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Gangplank vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Gangplank is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Gangplank holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Gangplank Build Against Fizz
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Gangplank needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Gangplank against Fizz are The Collector, Essence Reaver and Infinity Edge. This combination gives Gangplank an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Gangplank83.3%Fizz16.7%Gangplank75.0%Fizz25.0%Gangplank dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 83.3% win rate — a 66.7 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Gangplank can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Gangplank is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Gangplank, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Gangplank holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Fizz players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Gangplank Runes Against Fizz
Inspiration
Precision
Running Inspiration primary with Precision secondary allows Gangplank to press their advantage against Fizz, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Gangplank matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.3. The table below shows Gangplank's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Gangplank build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.85% | 136 | 7.3 | 945 | 14,040 | 47.7% | 42.3% | |
| 55.56% | 135 | 7.4 | 1,034 | 14,768 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.87% | 109 | 7.3 | 1,303 | 14,143 | 52.1% | 41.0% | |
| 37.74% | 106 | 7.0 | 1,026 | 14,160 | 32.7% | 42.6% | |
| 48.00% | 100 | 7.2 | 851 | 13,641 | 53.3% | 43.6% | |
| 51.02% | 98 | 6.9 | 998 | 14,421 | 52.4% | 50.0% | |
| 48.96% | 96 | 6.9 | 1,089 | 13,651 | 49.0% | 48.9% | |
| 48.86% | 88 | 7.0 | 934 | 14,040 | 38.6% | 59.1% | |
| 44.16% | 77 | 6.8 | 841 | 13,936 | 32.3% | 52.2% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 7.0 | 960 | 14,858 | 48.6% | 45.0% | |
| 44.74% | 76 | 7.2 | 929 | 14,328 | 48.8% | 40.0% | |
| 52.00% | 75 | 7.3 | 964 | 15,121 | 50.0% | 53.5% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 6.8 | 993 | 13,897 | 48.5% | 55.0% | |
| 47.22% | 72 | 7.5 | 1,185 | 15,731 | 33.3% | 54.2% | |
| 44.44% | 72 | 6.9 | 993 | 13,853 | 48.3% | 41.9% | |
| 43.66% | 71 | 7.0 | 949 | 14,201 | 32.4% | 55.9% | |
| 53.62% | 69 | 7.0 | 1,048 | 14,424 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.65% | 68 | 6.8 | 904 | 13,890 | 24.1% | 56.4% | |
| 46.27% | 67 | 6.9 | 954 | 14,592 | 58.3% | 39.5% | |
| 43.28% | 67 | 7.2 | 1,191 | 14,905 | 33.3% | 48.8% | |
| 42.42% | 66 | 7.8 | 1,076 | 15,776 | 33.3% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 66 | 7.1 | 985 | 14,725 | 51.7% | 48.6% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 7.1 | 991 | 13,820 | 61.3% | 46.9% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 7.3 | 1,076 | 14,427 | 57.1% | 55.9% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 7.2 | 990 | 15,602 | 55.0% | 46.0% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 7.1 | 1,007 | 14,561 | 47.6% | 48.3% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 7.2 | 1,069 | 15,154 | 43.5% | 57.7% | |
| 44.68% | 47 | 7.2 | 1,012 | 14,438 | 45.5% | 44.0% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 7.4 | 1,036 | 15,531 | 43.8% | 48.0% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 6.8 | 944 | 14,529 | 42.9% | 46.1% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 7.2 | 842 | 13,909 | 36.8% | 66.7% | |
| 38.46% | 39 | 6.7 | 1,073 | 14,542 | 42.9% | 36.0% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 6.6 | 1,211 | 14,429 | 47.1% | 57.1% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 7.0 | 978 | 16,007 | 53.3% | 68.2% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 7.4 | 944 | 14,214 | 70.0% | 29.2% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 6.5 | 872 | 15,090 | 44.4% | 52.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 7.0 | 1,072 | 14,526 | 54.5% | 52.2% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 6.8 | 1,084 | 14,640 | 46.1% | 47.6% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.7 | 1,011 | 13,857 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 7.1 | 1,004 | 15,062 | 60.0% | 56.3% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 7.7 | 910 | 15,273 | 70.0% | 42.9% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 7.3 | 916 | 14,728 | 25.0% | 47.8% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.8 | 811 | 14,491 | 60.0% | 64.3% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.5 | 905 | 14,955 | 53.9% | 60.0% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 6.7 | 1,051 | 15,046 | 72.7% | 58.8% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 837 | 15,151 | 62.5% | 47.1% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 7.1 | 928 | 13,905 | 54.5% | 58.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.4 | 988 | 14,952 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 7.5 | 1,071 | 16,123 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.7 | 995 | 15,726 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.8 | 934 | 14,513 | 70.0% | 36.4% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 6.8 | 1,017 | 14,137 | 85.7% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 7.4 | 931 | 15,319 | 22.2% | 41.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.9 | 937 | 13,967 | 72.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 7.1 | 1,098 | 15,835 | 40.0% | 53.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 7.2 | 933 | 15,245 | 71.4% | 41.7% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 7.0 | 1,089 | 15,809 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 7.3 | 844 | 13,473 | 22.2% | 44.4% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.5 | 954 | 14,621 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 7.2 | 1,117 | 16,160 | 40.0% | 77.8% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 7.2 | 1,036 | 13,588 | 83.3% | 75.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.9 | 1,248 | 18,059 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.9 | 1,034 | 14,587 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.8 | 925 | 15,305 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.6 | 1,114 | 14,772 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 7.1 | 761 | 13,494 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.4 | 952 | 14,593 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 7.6 | 1,038 | 16,032 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 871 | 13,964 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 725 | 10,882 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.0 | 800 | 14,206 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.2 | 907 | 15,131 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 6.8 | 707 | 12,043 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.9 | 675 | 13,987 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 526 | 9,197 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.5 | 920 | 12,005 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 915 | 13,734 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 804 | 14,716 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.1 | 812 | 13,014 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 833 | 13,954 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 1,150 | 14,857 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.0 | 882 | 15,236 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.9 | 902 | 13,606 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 7.1 | 875 | 13,276 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.1 | 1,041 | 13,818 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 7.6 | 1,223 | 16,797 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.5 | 1,237 | 17,185 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 790 | 13,498 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 755 | 12,878 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.5 | 901 | 9,965 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.7 | 1,007 | 13,546 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 1,047 | 16,179 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.6 | 943 | 12,679 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 984 | 15,723 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 967 | 14,747 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 804 | 10,850 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 1,049 | 15,540 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 684 | 10,290 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Gangplank vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gangplank do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Gangplank wins the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup with a 78.6% win rate compared to Fizz's 21.4%, a 57.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 14 recent ranked games in patch 26.3.
How does Gangplank do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Gangplank has the advantage against Fizz with a 83.3% win rate versus 16.7%. Gangplank players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Gangplank do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Gangplank takes over the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Gangplank scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup?
Gangplank wins the matchup against Fizz with a 78.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.3. The 57.1 percentage point advantage means Gangplank is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 14 games analyzed.
What is the best Gangplank build against Fizz?
The best Gangplank build against Fizz includes The Collector, Essence Reaver, Infinity Edge with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Gangplank runes against Fizz?
The best Gangplank runes against Fizz use the Inspiration primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Gangplank vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Gangplank counter Fizz?
Yes, Gangplank has a favorable matchup against Fizz with a 78.6% win rate. Gangplank strongly counters Fizz in lane based on current patch 26.3 data.
How do I play Gangplank against Fizz?
When playing Gangplank against Fizz, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.