Malphitevs Cassiopeia
Malphite vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Malphite wins with a 62.5% win rate (+25.0%) over Cassiopeia based on 8 games. Malphite holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Malphite build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Malphite Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Malphite performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Malphite vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Malphite vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 8 recent matches analyzed, Malphite wins with a 62.5% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 37.5%, giving Malphite a 25.0 percentage point advantage. Malphite dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Malphite leads by 684 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Malphite players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Malphite vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Malphite, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Malphite Build Against Cassiopeia
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Malphite needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Malphite against Cassiopeia are Malignance, Thornmail and Kaenic Rookern. This combination gives Malphite an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Malphite50.0%
Cassiopeia50.0%Malphite66.7%Cassiopeia33.3%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Malphite and Cassiopeia, with Malphite holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Malphite is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Malphite, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Malphite holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Malphite Runes Against Cassiopeia
Sorcery
Resolve
Running Sorcery primary with Resolve secondary allows Malphite to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Malphite matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Malphite's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Malphite build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.58% | 212 | 5.6 | 710 | 10,892 | 48.7% | 48.5% | |
| 43.69% | 206 | 5.0 | 634 | 9,403 | 38.8% | 47.1% | |
| 45.33% | 150 | 5.8 | 840 | 10,166 | 43.1% | 47.1% | |
| 55.56% | 135 | 6.2 | 735 | 10,756 | 60.0% | 52.9% | |
| 44.53% | 128 | 4.8 | 729 | 10,277 | 44.2% | 44.7% | |
| 45.13% | 113 | 5.7 | 924 | 10,332 | 42.2% | 47.1% | |
| 57.66% | 111 | 5.8 | 738 | 10,428 | 60.4% | 55.6% | |
| 63.30% | 109 | 6.3 | 864 | 11,585 | 66.7% | 60.9% | |
| 54.08% | 98 | 5.2 | 747 | 11,075 | 45.5% | 61.1% | |
| 44.44% | 90 | 5.6 | 755 | 10,447 | 36.8% | 50.0% | |
| 42.70% | 89 | 5.8 | 698 | 10,044 | 34.3% | 48.1% | |
| 50.00% | 78 | 5.8 | 720 | 10,496 | 51.4% | 48.8% | |
| 46.05% | 76 | 6.1 | 775 | 10,666 | 46.9% | 45.5% | |
| 54.93% | 71 | 5.7 | 765 | 10,023 | 54.5% | 55.3% | |
| 48.57% | 70 | 5.5 | 791 | 9,670 | 41.9% | 53.9% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 6.0 | 771 | 11,251 | 50.0% | 51.1% | |
| 54.55% | 66 | 4.7 | 777 | 9,495 | 51.7% | 56.8% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 5.2 | 721 | 10,765 | 43.5% | 52.5% | |
| 46.03% | 63 | 5.7 | 781 | 9,886 | 40.0% | 51.5% | |
| 44.07% | 59 | 5.8 | 698 | 9,413 | 54.5% | 37.8% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 4.6 | 711 | 9,840 | 57.7% | 54.5% | |
| 66.10% | 59 | 5.7 | 825 | 10,337 | 70.4% | 62.5% | |
| 58.62% | 58 | 6.3 | 782 | 11,276 | 69.6% | 51.4% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 5.6 | 701 | 9,627 | 51.9% | 46.7% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 5.4 | 732 | 10,790 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 55 | 5.9 | 789 | 10,460 | 54.5% | 57.6% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 5.3 | 758 | 10,522 | 43.5% | 60.0% | |
| 51.92% | 52 | 5.6 | 928 | 10,465 | 36.8% | 60.6% | |
| 46.15% | 52 | 5.7 | 840 | 10,520 | 55.0% | 40.6% | |
| 64.71% | 51 | 6.1 | 742 | 10,935 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 76.00% | 50 | 5.8 | 770 | 11,978 | 89.5% | 67.7% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 675 | 11,067 | 71.4% | 37.9% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 3.1 | 660 | 10,713 | 57.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 2.3 | 595 | 11,770 | 44.0% | 52.2% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 2.2 | 624 | 10,400 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 46.81% | 47 | 5.7 | 747 | 11,230 | 47.1% | 46.7% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 5.9 | 804 | 10,597 | 47.8% | 52.2% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 5.9 | 703 | 11,418 | 69.2% | 50.0% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 4.9 | 812 | 12,213 | 33.3% | 51.4% | |
| 59.09% | 44 | 6.0 | 719 | 11,027 | 60.0% | 58.6% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 1.9 | 668 | 12,563 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 5.3 | 653 | 9,130 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 5.3 | 568 | 10,705 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 2.4 | 711 | 11,332 | 22.2% | 65.2% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 4.9 | 742 | 10,160 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 5.4 | 840 | 10,676 | 57.1% | 42.3% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 4.9 | 785 | 12,945 | 71.4% | 30.4% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 6.5 | 773 | 11,484 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 1.4 | 663 | 11,754 | 62.5% | 66.7% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 2.9 | 693 | 11,262 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 2.1 | 657 | 10,061 | 69.2% | 41.2% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 2.3 | 580 | 9,192 | 33.3% | 38.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 2.3 | 641 | 11,231 | 45.5% | 63.2% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 2.2 | 691 | 10,963 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 5.1 | 695 | 10,427 | 63.6% | 43.8% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 5.5 | 718 | 9,086 | 28.6% | 46.1% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 1.5 | 650 | 11,847 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.3 | 734 | 11,618 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.6 | 654 | 12,343 | 50.0% | 68.8% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.8 | 861 | 9,839 | 58.3% | 33.3% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 3.7 | 661 | 10,948 | 27.3% | 66.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.9 | 576 | 8,565 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.7 | 643 | 12,065 | 37.5% | 46.7% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 4.7 | 664 | 9,785 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.5 | 585 | 10,856 | 40.0% | 41.2% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 4.7 | 742 | 9,219 | 63.6% | 54.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 2.7 | 747 | 9,738 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.5 | 847 | 10,942 | 37.5% | 53.9% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 3.5 | 615 | 8,168 | 40.0% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.0 | 810 | 9,855 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 3.5 | 750 | 12,123 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 5.3 | 755 | 10,688 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.4 | 737 | 11,994 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 3.4 | 696 | 11,169 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.9 | 848 | 11,199 | 77.8% | 33.3% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 3.1 | 585 | 10,883 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.7 | 592 | 9,446 | 87.5% | 22.2% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 3.7 | 691 | 7,488 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.0 | 693 | 9,020 | 25.0% | 44.4% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 2.0 | 697 | 13,533 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 540 | 9,303 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.4 | 705 | 11,142 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 4.6 | 798 | 9,491 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.6 | 577 | 11,115 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 1.9 | 527 | 7,747 | 54.5% | 100.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.6 | 580 | 9,401 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 4.8 | 652 | 10,513 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 2.5 | 625 | 12,616 | 20.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.3 | 619 | 10,582 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.6 | 674 | 8,998 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.1 | 543 | 9,415 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 4.4 | 722 | 11,140 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.0 | 563 | 10,560 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 711 | 9,609 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 594 | 10,900 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.2 | 742 | 10,573 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.4 | 684 | 10,632 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 3.6 | 582 | 8,026 | 14.3% | 25.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.6 | 529 | 8,328 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.8 | 787 | 13,157 | 0.0% | 70.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.0 | 668 | 9,415 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.3 | 661 | 10,175 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.4 | 656 | 10,599 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 4.0 | 715 | 11,998 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.5 | 718 | 11,784 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.5 | 695 | 11,049 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 677 | 8,351 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 591 | 12,733 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.5 | 686 | 11,859 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 1.3 | 666 | 10,473 | 80.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.7 | 657 | 8,918 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 877 | 11,733 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 563 | 11,416 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 788 | 11,333 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.8 | 771 | 10,763 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 800 | 12,260 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.4 | 628 | 7,465 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 708 | 11,229 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.6 | 604 | 9,838 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.0 | 604 | 9,811 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.0 | 484 | 10,583 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.0 | 521 | 11,575 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.4 | 740 | 11,883 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.1 | 612 | 9,090 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.1 | 717 | 11,610 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.6 | 675 | 9,975 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.9 | 617 | 12,250 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.2 | 509 | 9,100 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.6 | 598 | 9,772 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.2 | 549 | 5,924 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.1 | 625 | 9,947 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.8 | 720 | 9,775 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.6 | 581 | 9,040 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.7 | 623 | 8,447 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.4 | 745 | 11,632 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.3 | 718 | 12,462 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.9 | 547 | 9,499 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 627 | 12,505 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.7 | 624 | 8,118 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 603 | 9,380 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 791 | 9,193 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 838 | 13,416 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 831 | 12,528 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 681 | 15,181 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 899 | 13,032 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Malphite vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Malphite do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Malphite wins the Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 37.5%, a 25.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 8 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Malphite do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Malphite has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Malphite players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Malphite do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Malphite takes over the Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Malphite scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Malphite wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 62.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 25.0 percentage point advantage means Malphite is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 8 games analyzed.
What is the best Malphite build against Cassiopeia?
The best Malphite build against Cassiopeia includes Malignance, Thornmail, Kaenic Rookern with Mercury's Treads. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Malphite runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Malphite runes against Cassiopeia use the Sorcery primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Malphite vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Malphite counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Malphite has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 62.5% win rate. Malphite strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Malphite against Cassiopeia?
When playing Malphite against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.