
Melvs Ivern
Mel vs Ivern is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Ivern wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Mel based on 5 games. Mel wins the early laning phase while Ivern scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Mel build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Mel vs Ivern matchup.
Mel Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Mel performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Mel vs Ivern Matchup?

Mel vs Ivern Matchup Summary
The Mel vs Ivern matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Ivern wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Mel's 40.0%, giving Ivern a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Mel controls the early laning stage, but Ivern outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Mel needs to press advantages before Ivern reaches their power spikes, while Ivern should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Mel leads by 316 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ivern has a strong advantage in this matchup. Mel players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ivern overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Mel vs Ivern Laning Phase Breakdown
Mel is favored during the laning phase against Ivern, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Mel holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Mel Build Against Ivern
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Ivern, providing the mobility and stats Mel needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Mel against Ivern are Luden's Echo, Liandry's Torment and Shadowflame. This combination gives Mel an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Ivern. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Mel vs Ivern matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Mel dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Ivern. This lopsided early game means Mel can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ivern is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Mel. Extended games heavily favor Ivern, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Mel must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Ivern reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Ivern survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Mel Runes Against Ivern
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Mel the best tools to compete against Ivern in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Mel matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Mel's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Mel build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.09% | 256 | 4.1 | 774 | 11,543 | 48.2% | 44.5% | |
| 53.62% | 207 | 6.9 | 955 | 12,669 | 53.2% | 54.0% | |
| 39.38% | 193 | 2.5 | 719 | 10,669 | 52.1% | 32.0% | |
| 48.15% | 189 | 6.8 | 836 | 12,478 | 55.1% | 43.2% | |
| 51.27% | 158 | 6.7 | 805 | 11,214 | 50.7% | 51.8% | |
| 54.11% | 146 | 4.1 | 780 | 11,606 | 61.7% | 48.8% | |
| 45.39% | 141 | 6.4 | 862 | 12,555 | 44.6% | 46.0% | |
| 51.08% | 139 | 6.9 | 998 | 14,001 | 52.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.93% | 138 | 5.3 | 766 | 11,943 | 47.3% | 43.4% | |
| 53.97% | 126 | 2.8 | 752 | 10,949 | 60.0% | 50.6% | |
| 51.67% | 120 | 6.4 | 804 | 11,973 | 57.7% | 47.1% | |
| 52.29% | 109 | 6.3 | 909 | 11,625 | 62.0% | 44.1% | |
| 50.00% | 106 | 2.1 | 731 | 10,056 | 46.8% | 52.5% | |
| 46.15% | 104 | 2.1 | 661 | 10,245 | 50.0% | 44.1% | |
| 44.66% | 103 | 3.1 | 792 | 11,041 | 43.6% | 45.3% | |
| 42.16% | 102 | 6.8 | 981 | 12,392 | 47.8% | 37.5% | |
| 51.09% | 92 | 6.7 | 837 | 12,405 | 56.8% | 45.8% | |
| 36.67% | 90 | 6.9 | 778 | 11,776 | 38.2% | 35.7% | |
| 35.96% | 89 | 6.5 | 840 | 11,984 | 35.9% | 36.0% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 6.8 | 927 | 13,680 | 45.5% | 47.7% | |
| 41.38% | 87 | 2.3 | 751 | 10,235 | 41.7% | 41.0% | |
| 46.43% | 84 | 6.7 | 865 | 12,035 | 44.4% | 47.9% | |
| 45.33% | 75 | 3.8 | 771 | 11,975 | 48.5% | 42.9% | |
| 51.35% | 74 | 2.2 | 708 | 10,253 | 66.7% | 39.0% | |
| 49.30% | 71 | 6.6 | 862 | 12,068 | 58.1% | 42.5% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 6.2 | 945 | 12,554 | 48.3% | 39.0% | |
| 52.86% | 70 | 5.9 | 875 | 13,771 | 50.0% | 54.4% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 6.2 | 837 | 12,899 | 43.5% | 42.5% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 3.6 | 785 | 11,475 | 60.0% | 51.2% | |
| 53.73% | 67 | 6.7 | 881 | 12,426 | 50.0% | 56.8% | |
| 52.24% | 67 | 6.0 | 896 | 12,645 | 48.5% | 55.9% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 3.0 | 821 | 11,370 | 53.3% | 41.7% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 7.3 | 1,035 | 12,742 | 43.8% | 53.1% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 6.4 | 851 | 12,721 | 46.1% | 51.4% | |
| 53.23% | 62 | 6.9 | 905 | 11,540 | 61.8% | 42.9% | |
| 36.07% | 61 | 2.3 | 763 | 10,166 | 40.6% | 31.0% | |
| 55.74% | 61 | 6.3 | 853 | 12,231 | 58.3% | 54.0% | |
| 38.33% | 60 | 2.3 | 684 | 9,540 | 32.3% | 44.8% | |
| 60.00% | 60 | 6.8 | 943 | 12,079 | 53.3% | 66.7% | |
| 42.11% | 57 | 6.6 | 977 | 14,093 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 56 | 2.2 | 546 | 10,141 | 36.0% | 48.4% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 2.3 | 758 | 10,622 | 43.5% | 48.5% | |
| 42.59% | 54 | 6.8 | 948 | 11,180 | 62.5% | 26.7% | |
| 58.00% | 50 | 6.8 | 943 | 12,915 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 6.4 | 863 | 12,067 | 42.9% | 51.7% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.7 | 864 | 12,125 | 45.0% | 43.3% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 2.8 | 737 | 10,792 | 57.9% | 36.7% | |
| 64.58% | 48 | 6.6 | 933 | 12,492 | 65.2% | 64.0% | |
| 56.25% | 48 | 6.6 | 931 | 13,421 | 65.2% | 48.0% | |
| 40.43% | 47 | 7.0 | 922 | 12,110 | 47.6% | 34.6% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 5.9 | 922 | 12,132 | 35.3% | 40.0% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 6.8 | 825 | 13,890 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 2.0 | 666 | 9,964 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 6.5 | 848 | 12,553 | 38.9% | 42.3% | |
| 31.82% | 44 | 6.0 | 818 | 11,046 | 40.9% | 22.7% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 6.4 | 898 | 12,065 | 58.8% | 50.0% | |
| 34.88% | 43 | 2.5 | 673 | 10,057 | 25.0% | 43.5% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 2.3 | 894 | 10,073 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 5.0 | 954 | 13,553 | 69.2% | 40.7% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.8 | 908 | 12,074 | 40.9% | 55.6% | |
| 39.47% | 38 | 2.1 | 632 | 9,872 | 33.3% | 45.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 6.5 | 939 | 13,243 | 56.3% | 33.3% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 6.7 | 841 | 12,022 | 61.5% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 2.2 | 679 | 10,174 | 35.7% | 60.0% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 6.3 | 904 | 12,297 | 54.5% | 27.3% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 2.0 | 577 | 9,729 | 46.1% | 44.4% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.8 | 766 | 10,361 | 56.3% | 40.0% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 3.7 | 799 | 12,740 | 42.9% | 56.5% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 2.2 | 590 | 8,587 | 26.7% | 53.3% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.3 | 876 | 14,082 | 62.5% | 35.0% | |
| 67.86% | 28 | 6.6 | 854 | 13,742 | 75.0% | 65.0% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.5 | 937 | 14,675 | 62.5% | 35.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 5.9 | 877 | 12,251 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.4 | 720 | 10,443 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 2.8 | 707 | 9,740 | 58.3% | 53.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.6 | 1,131 | 13,206 | 44.4% | 43.8% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 6.6 | 859 | 12,651 | 27.3% | 46.1% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 7.4 | 795 | 13,286 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.5 | 952 | 14,356 | 66.7% | 52.9% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 2.3 | 752 | 10,997 | 14.3% | 43.8% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 4.8 | 855 | 12,514 | 44.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.2 | 706 | 10,799 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 5.0 | 1,103 | 13,250 | 57.1% | 46.7% | |
| 18.18% | 22 | 2.0 | 665 | 9,893 | 20.0% | 16.7% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.8 | 786 | 11,659 | 41.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.3 | 756 | 10,110 | 63.6% | 36.4% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 7.2 | 1,056 | 13,635 | 57.1% | 53.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.8 | 1,038 | 14,817 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.2 | 763 | 9,869 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 7.1 | 891 | 11,919 | 41.7% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.9 | 902 | 11,019 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 3.3 | 783 | 10,749 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.9 | 1,016 | 11,408 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 7.1 | 876 | 13,933 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.5 | 766 | 9,449 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.3 | 734 | 9,661 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.2 | 1,033 | 13,551 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 7.6 | 716 | 13,752 | 40.0% | 14.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.4 | 891 | 13,772 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.6 | 836 | 11,417 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 848 | 13,663 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.6 | 858 | 13,367 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 916 | 13,146 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.9 | 939 | 11,647 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 902 | 12,875 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.3 | 769 | 14,180 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 815 | 13,281 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 827 | 10,050 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 642 | 6,359 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.2 | 667 | 9,572 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.5 | 685 | 12,516 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.5 | 815 | 10,828 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.2 | 862 | 12,072 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.0 | 711 | 11,924 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.9 | 700 | 12,008 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 965 | 14,496 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,088 | 13,815 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 937 | 12,097 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 1,076 | 13,523 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 781 | 13,474 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 855 | 12,655 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 1,256 | 11,106 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 760 | 8,581 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 913 | 12,852 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 990 | 11,807 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Mel vs Ivern - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Mel do against Ivern in League of Legends?
Ivern wins the Mel vs Ivern matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Mel's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Mel do against Ivern in the early game?
In the early game, Mel has the advantage against Ivern with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Mel players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Mel do against Ivern in the late game?
In the late game, Ivern takes over the Mel vs Ivern matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Ivern scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Mel vs Ivern matchup?
Ivern wins the matchup against Mel with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Ivern is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Mel build against Ivern?
The best Mel build against Ivern includes Luden's Echo, Liandry's Torment, Shadowflame with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Mel runes against Ivern?
The best Mel runes against Ivern use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Mel vs Ivern matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Mel counter Ivern?
No, Mel struggles against Ivern with only a 40.0% win rate. Ivern has the advantage in this matchup. Mel players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ivern's lead.
How do I play Mel against Ivern?
When playing Mel against Ivern, play cautiously and avoid Ivern's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ivern has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.