Melvs Singed
Mel vs Singed is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.9. Singed wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Mel based on 6 games. Mel wins the early laning phase while Singed scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Mel build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Mel vs Singed matchup.
Mel Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Mel performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Singed(33.3%)Who Wins the Mel vs Singed Matchup?
Mel vs Singed Matchup Summary
The Mel vs Singed matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Singed wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Mel's 33.3%, giving Singed a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Mel controls the early laning stage, but Singed outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Mel needs to press advantages before Singed reaches their power spikes, while Singed should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Singed leads by 942 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Singed has a strong advantage in this matchup. Mel players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Singed overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Mel vs Singed Laning Phase Breakdown
Singed is favored during the laning phase against Mel, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Singed holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Mel Build Against Singed
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Singed, providing the mobility and stats Mel needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Mel against Singed are Luden's Echo, Shadowflame and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Mel an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Singed. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Mel vs Singed matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Mel0.0%Singed0.0%Mel33.3%Singed66.7%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Mel and Singed, with Mel holding a razor-thin 0.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Singed is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Mel. Extended games heavily favor Singed, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Mel has the edge early, but Singed gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Mel Runes Against Singed
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Mel the best tools to compete against Singed in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Mel matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.9. The table below shows Mel's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Mel build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.44% | 162 | 3.7 | 793 | 11,942 | 38.9% | 47.2% | |
| 45.45% | 132 | 6.9 | 908 | 12,052 | 44.1% | 46.6% | |
| 44.54% | 119 | 4.1 | 784 | 11,739 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 45.54% | 112 | 6.8 | 844 | 12,972 | 35.6% | 52.2% | |
| 43.12% | 110 | 2.8 | 730 | 11,277 | 45.5% | 42.1% | |
| 40.59% | 101 | 6.7 | 943 | 12,345 | 43.5% | 38.2% | |
| 38.46% | 91 | 5.3 | 771 | 11,683 | 38.2% | 38.6% | |
| 53.41% | 88 | 6.5 | 861 | 12,456 | 44.4% | 59.6% | |
| 40.00% | 85 | 3.7 | 769 | 10,984 | 52.6% | 29.8% | |
| 54.32% | 81 | 6.7 | 981 | 12,620 | 64.3% | 49.1% | |
| 60.27% | 73 | 6.8 | 947 | 13,834 | 64.5% | 57.1% | |
| 51.52% | 66 | 6.6 | 906 | 11,414 | 54.0% | 48.3% | |
| 38.46% | 65 | 6.5 | 783 | 12,404 | 45.8% | 34.1% | |
| 46.03% | 63 | 2.1 | 690 | 10,227 | 42.9% | 48.6% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 2.0 | 775 | 11,191 | 53.3% | 39.1% | |
| 60.00% | 55 | 6.8 | 943 | 13,314 | 61.9% | 58.8% | |
| 58.49% | 53 | 6.6 | 867 | 12,428 | 62.5% | 55.2% | |
| 61.54% | 52 | 3.5 | 840 | 10,774 | 60.7% | 62.5% | |
| 34.62% | 52 | 6.2 | 788 | 11,316 | 46.1% | 23.1% | |
| 37.25% | 51 | 3.6 | 899 | 11,515 | 39.1% | 35.7% | |
| 40.00% | 50 | 6.3 | 788 | 11,646 | 38.1% | 41.4% | |
| 63.27% | 49 | 6.4 | 905 | 12,856 | 76.2% | 53.6% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 6.0 | 853 | 12,522 | 52.6% | 41.4% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 6.7 | 935 | 13,629 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 69.57% | 46 | 6.8 | 1,022 | 14,356 | 52.4% | 84.0% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 6.8 | 801 | 12,248 | 20.0% | 56.7% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 2.9 | 666 | 10,329 | 42.1% | 46.1% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 2.1 | 752 | 10,131 | 36.4% | 52.2% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 6.2 | 749 | 12,499 | 68.8% | 29.6% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 6.3 | 923 | 13,381 | 47.4% | 58.3% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 2.2 | 708 | 10,457 | 50.0% | 57.7% | |
| 42.86% | 42 | 6.8 | 949 | 13,752 | 46.1% | 41.4% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 6.5 | 812 | 12,067 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 6.4 | 834 | 10,995 | 50.0% | 47.6% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 6.4 | 913 | 13,722 | 68.4% | 45.5% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 6.3 | 835 | 12,784 | 63.2% | 45.5% | |
| 40.00% | 40 | 2.4 | 636 | 9,601 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 2.1 | 760 | 11,102 | 43.8% | 45.8% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 5.6 | 1,040 | 13,202 | 58.3% | 42.9% | |
| 41.03% | 39 | 2.0 | 671 | 10,694 | 43.8% | 39.1% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 2.4 | 739 | 11,098 | 54.5% | 37.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 5.6 | 916 | 11,139 | 47.4% | 44.4% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 3.5 | 702 | 10,714 | 42.9% | 47.8% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 7.5 | 867 | 12,401 | 55.0% | 35.3% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 6.6 | 980 | 12,895 | 69.2% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 6.6 | 937 | 12,782 | 46.1% | 52.2% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 2.1 | 609 | 10,109 | 60.0% | 30.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 7.1 | 886 | 13,500 | 53.3% | 55.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.6 | 843 | 11,512 | 62.5% | 44.4% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 6.4 | 811 | 12,081 | 60.0% | 56.5% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 2.0 | 675 | 11,223 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 2.8 | 671 | 8,365 | 38.1% | 40.0% | |
| 29.03% | 31 | 1.9 | 656 | 10,216 | 33.3% | 26.3% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 7.0 | 987 | 14,640 | 45.5% | 57.9% | |
| 27.59% | 29 | 3.6 | 728 | 10,374 | 42.9% | 22.7% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 2.6 | 760 | 11,352 | 62.5% | 68.4% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 6.8 | 924 | 13,432 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 7.0 | 1,010 | 12,979 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 5.7 | 961 | 12,672 | 62.5% | 41.2% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.9 | 809 | 11,902 | 60.0% | 46.7% | |
| 32.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 743 | 11,020 | 25.0% | 38.5% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.4 | 757 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.9 | 907 | 13,869 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.9 | 918 | 14,488 | 57.1% | 43.8% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.4 | 643 | 9,570 | 70.0% | 16.7% | |
| 19.05% | 21 | 6.1 | 730 | 11,067 | 12.5% | 23.1% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.8 | 871 | 12,649 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.7 | 900 | 12,184 | 55.6% | 41.7% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 7.0 | 856 | 11,235 | 55.6% | 27.3% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 7.3 | 909 | 13,111 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 725 | 10,252 | 16.7% | 42.9% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 7.0 | 919 | 11,275 | 54.5% | 87.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.2 | 856 | 13,162 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.0 | 911 | 13,339 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.8 | 728 | 9,200 | 45.5% | 33.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.6 | 1,012 | 13,728 | 83.3% | 54.5% | |
| 81.25% | 16 | 2.8 | 866 | 10,915 | 71.4% | 88.9% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.0 | 630 | 10,509 | 20.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.0 | 845 | 12,780 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 7.0 | 1,018 | 13,631 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.1 | 976 | 14,256 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 7.1 | 1,063 | 15,444 | 75.0% | 70.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 7.1 | 987 | 13,181 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.7 | 792 | 11,192 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 2.9 | 775 | 10,391 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.8 | 969 | 12,080 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 2.0 | 587 | 10,041 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 7.5 | 928 | 12,773 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 7.2 | 827 | 11,268 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.5 | 656 | 8,907 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.2 | 685 | 10,386 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 7.0 | 832 | 12,865 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.7 | 810 | 12,022 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.1 | 892 | 10,510 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.9 | 879 | 16,910 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.3 | 750 | 9,929 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.2 | 1,070 | 12,505 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.6 | 857 | 12,834 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.7 | 1,100 | 14,245 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.8 | 959 | 15,075 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.9 | 1,035 | 15,210 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.6 | 951 | 13,280 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 824 | 12,899 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.3 | 921 | 11,739 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.2 | 706 | 9,149 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.1 | 822 | 12,844 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.6 | 843 | 14,775 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.2 | 670 | 11,004 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.7 | 707 | 13,066 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.0 | 829 | 9,907 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 701 | 14,003 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 766 | 12,812 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.0 | 821 | 10,181 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.6 | 968 | 13,649 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.9 | 919 | 16,354 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 657 | 10,819 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 769 | 9,243 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 688 | 9,379 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Mel vs Singed - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Mel do against Singed in League of Legends?
Singed wins the Mel vs Singed matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Mel's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.9.
How does Mel do against Singed in the early game?
In the early game, Mel has the advantage against Singed with a 0.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Mel players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Mel do against Singed in the late game?
In the late game, Singed takes over the Mel vs Singed matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Singed scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Mel vs Singed matchup?
Singed wins the matchup against Mel with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.9. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Singed is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Mel build against Singed?
The best Mel build against Singed includes Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Mel runes against Singed?
The best Mel runes against Singed use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Mel vs Singed matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Mel counter Singed?
No, Mel struggles against Singed with only a 33.3% win rate. Singed has the advantage in this matchup. Mel players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Singed's lead.
How do I play Mel against Singed?
When playing Mel against Singed, play cautiously and avoid Singed's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Singed has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.