
Miss Fortune vs Samira is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.15. Samira wins with a 51.9% win rate (+3.9%) over Miss Fortune based on 285 games. Samira wins the early laning phase while Miss Fortune scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Miss Fortune build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Miss Fortune vs Samira matchup.
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Miss Fortune performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.

The Miss Fortune vs Samira matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 285 recent matches analyzed, Samira wins with a 51.9% win rate compared to Miss Fortune's 48.1%, giving Samira a 3.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Samira controls the early laning stage, but Miss Fortune outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Samira needs to press advantages before Miss Fortune reaches their power spikes, while Miss Fortune should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Miss Fortune leads by 0.2s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Samira is slightly favored, Miss Fortune can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Samira's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Miss Fortune is favored during the laning phase against Samira, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Miss Fortune holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Samira dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.7% win rate — a 11.5 percentage point lead over Miss Fortune. This lopsided early game means Samira can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Miss Fortune at 50.9% win rate — only 1.8 points ahead of Samira. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Samira has the edge early, but Miss Fortune gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
The Inspiration and Sorcery rune setup gives Miss Fortune the best tools to compete against Samira in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Miss Fortune matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.15. The table below shows Miss Fortune's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Miss Fortune build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.87% | 1,148 | 6.1 | 830 | 14,576 | 52.7% | 49.7% | |
| 51.24% | 925 | 6.1 | 820 | 14,179 | 50.8% | 51.6% | |
| 49.33% | 673 | 6.1 | 873 | 14,018 | 51.1% | 47.8% | |
| 48.78% | 574 | 6.4 | 842 | 14,494 | 47.6% | 49.7% | |
| 49.80% | 512 | 6.0 | 854 | 14,411 | 52.4% | 47.7% | |
| 50.34% | 435 | 6.1 | 832 | 13,969 | 48.3% | 52.1% | |
| 52.80% | 411 | 6.2 | 916 | 14,820 | 52.0% | 53.3% | |
| 51.09% | 366 | 6.2 | 870 | 14,501 | 43.5% | 56.6% | |
| 48.07% | 285 | 6.0 | 886 | 14,215 | 44.3% | 50.9% | |
| 53.26% | 276 | 6.3 | 886 | 14,869 | 56.7% | 51.4% | |
| 45.28% | 254 | 5.8 | 803 | 14,140 | 55.3% | 38.4% | |
| 55.51% | 227 | 6.3 | 914 | 14,957 | 52.1% | 57.9% | |
| 51.63% | 215 | 6.0 | 827 | 13,899 | 53.6% | 50.0% | |
| 56.28% | 199 | 6.5 | 912 | 15,047 | 50.0% | 60.3% | |
| 49.73% | 187 | 6.0 | 811 | 14,612 | 44.8% | 52.5% | |
| 53.21% | 156 | 6.1 | 814 | 13,336 | 58.5% | 49.5% | |
| 50.67% | 150 | 5.8 | 765 | 13,747 | 42.9% | 57.5% | |
| 51.05% | 143 | 5.8 | 809 | 13,867 | 52.2% | 50.0% | |
| 43.97% | 116 | 6.3 | 849 | 14,451 | 38.6% | 47.2% | |
| 50.00% | 114 | 6.5 | 793 | 13,803 | 43.1% | 55.6% | |
| 49.09% | 110 | 5.9 | 826 | 13,829 | 38.3% | 57.1% | |
| 38.46% | 91 | 5.7 | 697 | 13,010 | 28.6% | 46.9% | |
| 45.56% | 90 | 6.6 | 757 | 13,436 | 47.5% | 44.0% | |
| 44.71% | 85 | 5.8 | 883 | 14,913 | 34.6% | 49.1% | |
| 56.79% | 81 | 6.2 | 897 | 14,713 | 59.5% | 54.5% | |
| 46.67% | 75 | 6.1 | 930 | 14,465 | 42.4% | 50.0% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 6.5 | 963 | 14,516 | 53.1% | 53.9% | |
| 44.64% | 56 | 6.0 | 703 | 13,264 | 29.4% | 51.3% | |
| 44.44% | 54 | 5.9 | 779 | 13,080 | 31.8% | 53.1% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 6.0 | 721 | 13,431 | 30.8% | 69.2% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 6.6 | 782 | 14,694 | 27.8% | 67.7% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 6.0 | 980 | 15,672 | 54.5% | 68.4% | |
| 37.84% | 37 | 6.0 | 797 | 12,816 | 30.0% | 47.1% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 6.3 | 960 | 18,181 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 6.2 | 815 | 13,773 | 41.7% | 77.8% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 6.2 | 741 | 14,107 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 5.8 | 849 | 13,683 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.7 | 840 | 14,825 | 42.9% | 42.1% | |
| 28.57% | 21 | 6.4 | 740 | 12,960 | 15.4% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.3 | 956 | 16,116 | 80.0% | 61.5% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 6.4 | 768 | 14,148 | 87.5% | 55.6% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 826 | 13,084 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.9 | 853 | 11,805 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.7 | 987 | 14,564 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.1 | 1,025 | 13,297 | 57.1% | 75.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.3 | 752 | 12,741 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 812 | 13,551 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 845 | 14,305 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 868 | 15,690 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 3.5 | 720 | 12,305 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.2 | 660 | 11,532 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.5 | 872 | 11,758 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.6 | 823 | 12,806 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.6 | 774 | 13,971 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 820 | 13,056 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.9 | 729 | 12,612 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 897 | 12,689 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 885 | 13,042 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 795 | 15,187 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 956 | 15,344 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.5 | 699 | 10,481 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.1 | 629 | 7,696 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.5 | 768 | 13,011 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 927 | 16,285 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 947 | 16,418 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.2 | 1,118 | 17,152 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.3 | 760 | 12,258 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.1 | 633 | 11,667 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.6 | 910 | 15,005 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.4 | 893 | 15,766 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 882 | 13,499 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 735 | 14,425 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 849 | 13,307 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 685 | 12,453 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 744 | 12,380 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,138 | 19,204 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 766 | 14,019 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,011 | 13,626 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 1,074 | 14,465 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 555 | 12,119 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Samira wins the Miss Fortune vs Samira matchup with a 51.9% win rate compared to Miss Fortune's 48.1%, a 3.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 285 recent ranked games in patch 26.15.
In the early game, Samira has the advantage against Miss Fortune with a 55.7% win rate versus 44.3%. Samira players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
In the late game, Miss Fortune takes over the Miss Fortune vs Samira matchup with a 50.9% win rate compared to 49.1%. Miss Fortune scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Samira wins the matchup against Miss Fortune with a 51.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.15. The 3.9 percentage point advantage means Samira is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 285 games analyzed.
The best Miss Fortune build against Samira includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
The best Miss Fortune runes against Samira use the Inspiration primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 57.7% win rate in the Miss Fortune vs Samira matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
No, Miss Fortune struggles against Samira with only a 48.1% win rate. Samira has the advantage in this matchup. Miss Fortune players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Samira's lead.
When playing Miss Fortune against Samira, play cautiously and avoid Samira's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Samira in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.