Mordekaiservs Xin Zhao
Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Mordekaiser wins with a 58.8% win rate (+17.6%) over Xin Zhao based on 17 games. Xin Zhao wins the early laning phase while Mordekaiser scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Mordekaiser build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Mordekaiser Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Mordekaiser performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Xin Zhao(58.8%)Who Wins the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Mordekaiser wins with a 58.8% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 41.2%, giving Mordekaiser a 17.6 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Xin Zhao controls the early laning stage, but Mordekaiser outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Xin Zhao needs to press advantages before Mordekaiser reaches their power spikes, while Mordekaiser should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Xin Zhao leads by 0.4s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Mordekaiser players can confidently pick into Xin Zhao and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Xin Zhao away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Mordekaiser, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Mordekaiser Build Against Xin Zhao
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Mordekaiser needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Mordekaiser against Xin Zhao are Liandry's Torment, Riftmaker and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Mordekaiser an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 80.0% win rate across 5 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Mordekaiser44.4%Xin Zhao55.6%Mordekaiser75.0%Xin Zhao25.0%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.6% win rate — a 11.1 percentage point lead over Mordekaiser. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Mordekaiser is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Mordekaiser, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Xin Zhao must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Mordekaiser reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Mordekaiser survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Mordekaiser Runes Against Xin Zhao
Precision
Inspiration
Running Precision primary with Inspiration secondary allows Mordekaiser to press their advantage against Xin Zhao, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Mordekaiser matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Mordekaiser's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Mordekaiser build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.91% | 378 | 6.3 | 922 | 12,346 | 57.7% | 49.0% | |
| 54.29% | 210 | 5.8 | 878 | 11,423 | 53.7% | 54.8% | |
| 42.16% | 205 | 5.7 | 964 | 12,055 | 39.0% | 44.3% | |
| 55.10% | 147 | 5.7 | 1,267 | 12,921 | 57.7% | 53.7% | |
| 50.00% | 146 | 6.0 | 826 | 11,769 | 40.9% | 58.7% | |
| 53.38% | 133 | 6.1 | 1,054 | 12,161 | 52.9% | 53.7% | |
| 49.15% | 118 | 5.9 | 784 | 12,878 | 53.7% | 46.8% | |
| 52.63% | 114 | 6.1 | 926 | 12,219 | 53.1% | 52.3% | |
| 59.65% | 114 | 5.4 | 796 | 11,732 | 58.3% | 60.6% | |
| 61.95% | 113 | 6.0 | 890 | 12,181 | 71.4% | 52.6% | |
| 50.00% | 112 | 6.0 | 899 | 11,722 | 52.8% | 47.5% | |
| 53.64% | 110 | 5.8 | 1,036 | 12,071 | 53.9% | 53.5% | |
| 37.38% | 107 | 5.8 | 861 | 11,806 | 36.2% | 38.3% | |
| 56.07% | 107 | 6.0 | 820 | 12,156 | 59.1% | 54.0% | |
| 50.49% | 103 | 6.5 | 1,006 | 12,154 | 47.5% | 52.4% | |
| 52.94% | 102 | 5.4 | 876 | 11,522 | 45.5% | 61.7% | |
| 41.58% | 101 | 6.3 | 1,108 | 12,288 | 32.5% | 47.5% | |
| 41.84% | 98 | 5.6 | 906 | 11,939 | 46.8% | 37.3% | |
| 50.00% | 96 | 5.7 | 882 | 11,562 | 56.1% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 86 | 6.2 | 1,137 | 13,227 | 60.7% | 44.8% | |
| 55.42% | 83 | 6.0 | 855 | 12,292 | 50.0% | 59.6% | |
| 55.56% | 81 | 5.9 | 1,178 | 12,531 | 64.3% | 50.9% | |
| 55.00% | 80 | 6.1 | 850 | 12,329 | 57.1% | 53.9% | |
| 37.18% | 78 | 6.3 | 819 | 12,412 | 44.8% | 32.6% | |
| 57.33% | 75 | 6.0 | 984 | 11,535 | 58.5% | 55.9% | |
| 60.00% | 75 | 6.2 | 802 | 11,849 | 61.1% | 59.0% | |
| 52.70% | 74 | 6.3 | 857 | 12,250 | 48.6% | 56.4% | |
| 46.58% | 73 | 5.4 | 770 | 11,142 | 55.6% | 37.8% | |
| 58.57% | 70 | 4.2 | 838 | 12,539 | 58.8% | 58.3% | |
| 63.24% | 68 | 5.6 | 706 | 12,043 | 63.3% | 63.2% | |
| 40.91% | 66 | 5.8 | 963 | 12,826 | 26.9% | 50.0% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 6.7 | 824 | 12,123 | 50.0% | 44.7% | |
| 58.06% | 62 | 6.1 | 838 | 12,148 | 62.1% | 54.5% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 5.7 | 891 | 12,493 | 48.0% | 64.7% | |
| 52.63% | 58 | 4.5 | 901 | 12,524 | 48.1% | 56.7% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 6.1 | 780 | 12,750 | 54.2% | 41.2% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 3.3 | 793 | 12,582 | 46.4% | 53.9% | |
| 45.28% | 53 | 5.8 | 869 | 11,080 | 45.5% | 45.2% | |
| 74.00% | 50 | 6.0 | 771 | 11,426 | 86.4% | 64.3% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 6.4 | 879 | 12,434 | 64.0% | 48.0% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 6.2 | 1,047 | 12,171 | 31.6% | 65.5% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 5.3 | 851 | 11,863 | 45.5% | 47.8% | |
| 29.55% | 44 | 5.7 | 631 | 10,859 | 31.3% | 28.6% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 1.6 | 833 | 13,004 | 35.0% | 52.6% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.4 | 727 | 12,768 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 3.1 | 761 | 10,965 | 47.6% | 47.1% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 2.9 | 821 | 12,962 | 38.5% | 47.4% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 5.5 | 909 | 12,990 | 64.3% | 58.8% | |
| 74.19% | 31 | 2.1 | 719 | 13,548 | 55.6% | 81.8% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 6.2 | 777 | 12,111 | 57.1% | 53.3% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.0 | 741 | 11,653 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 4.7 | 800 | 9,509 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 854 | 12,545 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 5.6 | 954 | 11,290 | 36.4% | 64.3% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.1 | 804 | 12,708 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 4.5 | 752 | 13,598 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.1 | 834 | 10,723 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 68.18% | 22 | 6.0 | 760 | 13,603 | 100.0% | 56.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 2.5 | 626 | 11,530 | 62.5% | 38.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 5.9 | 878 | 12,340 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 751 | 13,184 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.7 | 731 | 11,524 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 4.2 | 864 | 13,626 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.6 | 850 | 12,056 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.3 | 749 | 12,480 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 4.6 | 1,091 | 13,186 | 87.5% | 55.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.2 | 744 | 11,087 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 81.25% | 16 | 2.6 | 673 | 14,939 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.8 | 778 | 12,391 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 3.7 | 964 | 10,171 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.4 | 942 | 15,352 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.5 | 784 | 10,861 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.7 | 721 | 10,675 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 3.2 | 829 | 12,957 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.1 | 981 | 13,937 | 42.9% | 85.7% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.2 | 898 | 10,361 | 87.5% | 60.0% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 5.2 | 660 | 11,107 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.3 | 756 | 10,220 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.3 | 1,012 | 12,148 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.7 | 805 | 12,390 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.7 | 711 | 11,316 | 40.0% | 14.3% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 2.1 | 889 | 12,282 | 83.3% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.2 | 787 | 12,223 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.7 | 712 | 13,066 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.3 | 839 | 11,957 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 11 | 4.8 | 518 | 9,820 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.5 | 792 | 12,715 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 11 | 1.1 | 708 | 13,238 | 85.7% | 0.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 791 | 14,459 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 618 | 10,906 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.8 | 798 | 13,956 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.0 | 915 | 13,542 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 6.2 | 826 | 11,523 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.8 | 803 | 11,067 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.3 | 658 | 10,990 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.2 | 653 | 9,371 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.0 | 806 | 10,186 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 899 | 12,521 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 911 | 12,619 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.2 | 712 | 11,668 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 7 | 4.3 | 616 | 7,588 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.7 | 782 | 11,131 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 0.8 | 870 | 10,941 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.4 | 943 | 13,535 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 905 | 13,334 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.3 | 804 | 12,081 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.3 | 586 | 8,032 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 655 | 8,415 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 0.9 | 575 | 11,772 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.0 | 754 | 12,512 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 648 | 11,904 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 698 | 13,337 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 652 | 10,852 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 795 | 11,977 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 757 | 12,452 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 957 | 13,157 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 972 | 13,094 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 1,209 | 14,630 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 666 | 11,143 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 548 | 10,067 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 691 | 12,805 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 0.4 | 702 | 10,492 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 663 | 12,453 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 705 | 11,003 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Mordekaiser do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Mordekaiser wins the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 58.8% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 41.2%, a 17.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Mordekaiser do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Mordekaiser with a 55.6% win rate versus 44.4%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Mordekaiser do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Mordekaiser takes over the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Mordekaiser scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Mordekaiser wins the matchup against Xin Zhao with a 58.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 17.6 percentage point advantage means Mordekaiser is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Mordekaiser build against Xin Zhao?
The best Mordekaiser build against Xin Zhao includes Liandry's Torment, Riftmaker, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 80.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Mordekaiser runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Mordekaiser runes against Xin Zhao use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Mordekaiser vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Mordekaiser counter Xin Zhao?
Yes, Mordekaiser has a favorable matchup against Xin Zhao with a 58.8% win rate. Mordekaiser strongly counters Xin Zhao in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Mordekaiser against Xin Zhao?
When playing Mordekaiser against Xin Zhao, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Xin Zhao. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.