Olafvs Cassiopeia
Olaf vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Olaf wins with a 100.0% win rate (+100.0%) over Cassiopeia based on 5 games. Olaf holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Olaf build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Olaf Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Olaf performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Cassiopeia(100.0%)Who Wins the Olaf vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Olaf vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Olaf wins with a 100.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 0.0%, giving Olaf a 100.0 percentage point advantage. Olaf dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Olaf leads by 1,580 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Olaf players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Olaf vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Olaf is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Olaf holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Olaf Build Against Cassiopeia
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Olaf needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Olaf against Cassiopeia are Stridebreaker, Sundered Sky and Death's Dance. This combination gives Olaf an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Olaf100.0%Cassiopeia0.0%Olaf100.0%Cassiopeia0.0%Olaf dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Olaf can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Olaf is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Olaf, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Olaf holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Olaf Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Resolve
Running Precision primary with Resolve secondary allows Olaf to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Olaf matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Olaf's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Olaf build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.26% | 151 | 6.3 | 935 | 12,103 | 65.3% | 55.3% | |
| 57.04% | 135 | 6.2 | 859 | 13,044 | 64.4% | 51.3% | |
| 49.07% | 108 | 6.5 | 864 | 11,840 | 49.0% | 49.1% | |
| 56.98% | 86 | 6.0 | 845 | 12,339 | 51.4% | 60.8% | |
| 50.59% | 85 | 6.4 | 775 | 11,251 | 48.8% | 52.3% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 6.6 | 831 | 11,210 | 51.4% | 43.8% | |
| 42.42% | 66 | 6.1 | 825 | 10,692 | 34.5% | 48.6% | |
| 43.08% | 65 | 6.2 | 817 | 12,334 | 37.5% | 46.3% | |
| 45.90% | 61 | 6.5 | 902 | 11,758 | 44.4% | 48.0% | |
| 63.93% | 61 | 6.5 | 991 | 12,328 | 70.4% | 58.8% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 6.8 | 746 | 11,445 | 53.9% | 41.9% | |
| 59.65% | 57 | 6.8 | 803 | 12,948 | 65.4% | 54.8% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 7.0 | 968 | 12,226 | 69.6% | 34.4% | |
| 48.15% | 54 | 6.8 | 845 | 11,754 | 52.0% | 44.8% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 6.5 | 1,108 | 12,661 | 52.2% | 58.1% | |
| 53.70% | 54 | 6.7 | 991 | 12,216 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 48.08% | 52 | 6.7 | 1,262 | 13,274 | 52.6% | 45.5% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 6.6 | 956 | 12,244 | 36.8% | 61.3% | |
| 63.27% | 49 | 6.3 | 810 | 10,929 | 66.7% | 59.1% | |
| 59.57% | 47 | 6.9 | 930 | 12,130 | 70.4% | 45.0% | |
| 41.03% | 39 | 6.3 | 880 | 11,931 | 47.1% | 36.4% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 6.8 | 990 | 13,297 | 57.1% | 36.0% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 6.2 | 1,037 | 14,078 | 62.5% | 54.5% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 6.6 | 885 | 11,419 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 68.57% | 35 | 4.8 | 1,028 | 13,007 | 76.5% | 61.1% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.3 | 814 | 11,934 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 6.2 | 884 | 12,325 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 6.0 | 939 | 10,608 | 45.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 6.5 | 1,006 | 13,004 | 63.6% | 36.4% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 6.7 | 828 | 11,323 | 47.4% | 33.3% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.2 | 1,049 | 12,821 | 41.7% | 47.4% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 5.3 | 917 | 12,494 | 57.9% | 54.5% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 3.7 | 741 | 12,284 | 61.5% | 52.9% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 6.4 | 890 | 11,746 | 41.7% | 35.3% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.8 | 882 | 13,846 | 60.0% | 61.1% | |
| 71.43% | 28 | 6.3 | 925 | 12,080 | 71.4% | 71.4% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 6.5 | 757 | 11,532 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 4.3 | 863 | 12,708 | 53.9% | 76.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 945 | 12,469 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.5 | 903 | 13,486 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 2.6 | 905 | 14,116 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 3.8 | 814 | 13,113 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.2 | 848 | 13,846 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.6 | 820 | 14,643 | 16.7% | 53.3% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 787 | 12,754 | 57.1% | 38.5% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 6.5 | 927 | 12,732 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.3 | 805 | 10,910 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.6 | 773 | 11,576 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.7 | 965 | 13,235 | 57.1% | 54.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.4 | 896 | 12,537 | 75.0% | 55.6% | |
| 82.35% | 17 | 6.5 | 930 | 14,604 | 100.0% | 81.3% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.7 | 817 | 12,207 | 88.9% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 7.0 | 1,115 | 10,177 | 30.0% | 66.7% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.7 | 730 | 10,261 | 61.5% | 100.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 2.3 | 815 | 13,649 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.6 | 841 | 14,118 | 0.0% | 61.5% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.0 | 800 | 12,276 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 3.4 | 971 | 10,876 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 6.5 | 976 | 12,875 | 80.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.7 | 636 | 12,120 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 678 | 11,707 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.0 | 755 | 10,608 | 28.6% | 20.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 5.3 | 789 | 11,682 | 60.0% | 83.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.7 | 775 | 13,599 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 0.9 | 733 | 11,529 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 634 | 10,032 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 938 | 14,293 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.8 | 892 | 15,374 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 966 | 13,097 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.7 | 739 | 10,181 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.0 | 794 | 12,727 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.4 | 832 | 13,204 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.7 | 729 | 13,233 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.9 | 772 | 11,691 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.8 | 1,074 | 14,337 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.4 | 679 | 10,416 | 16.7% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 846 | 14,150 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.1 | 786 | 8,771 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.6 | 793 | 13,424 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.7 | 606 | 12,878 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 1,038 | 14,897 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.5 | 740 | 10,388 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.2 | 685 | 12,291 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 900 | 11,599 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.4 | 626 | 4,377 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 535 | 9,041 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.1 | 884 | 14,270 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.7 | 837 | 11,947 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.6 | 858 | 11,095 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 625 | 11,773 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 732 | 12,529 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 1,008 | 11,264 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 973 | 13,955 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 755 | 8,633 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 486 | 11,069 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 802 | 14,743 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 1,022 | 13,125 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Olaf vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Olaf do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Olaf wins the Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 0.0%, a 100.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Olaf do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Olaf has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Olaf players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Olaf do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Olaf takes over the Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Olaf scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Olaf wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 100.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 100.0 percentage point advantage means Olaf is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Olaf build against Cassiopeia?
The best Olaf build against Cassiopeia includes Stridebreaker, Sundered Sky, Death's Dance with Mercury's Treads. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Olaf runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Olaf runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Olaf vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Olaf counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Olaf has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 100.0% win rate. Olaf strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Olaf against Cassiopeia?
When playing Olaf against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.