Rengarvs Ambessa
Rengar vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Ambessa wins with a 73.9% win rate (+47.8%) over Rengar based on 23 games. Ambessa holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Rengar build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Rengar vs Ambessa matchup.
Rengar Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Rengar performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Rengar vs Ambessa Matchup?
Rengar vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Rengar vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 23 recent matches analyzed, Ambessa wins with a 73.9% win rate compared to Rengar's 26.1%, giving Ambessa a 47.8 percentage point advantage. Ambessa dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Rengar players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 679 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ambessa has a strong advantage in this matchup. Rengar players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ambessa overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Rengar vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against Rengar, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Rengar Build Against Ambessa
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Rengar needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Rengar against Ambessa are Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra and Umbral Glaive. This combination gives Rengar an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Rengar vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Rengar18.2%
Ambessa81.8%Rengar33.3%Ambessa66.7%Ambessa dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 81.8% win rate — a 63.6 percentage point lead over Rengar. This lopsided early game means Ambessa can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ambessa is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Rengar. Extended games heavily favor Ambessa, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Ambessa holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Rengar players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Rengar Runes Against Ambessa
Precision
Domination
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Rengar the best tools to compete against Ambessa in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Rengar matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Rengar's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Rengar build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.21% | 165 | 0.9 | 821 | 13,673 | 25.3% | 54.4% | |
| 47.10% | 138 | 0.9 | 736 | 13,082 | 48.3% | 46.3% | |
| 36.92% | 130 | 1.1 | 772 | 12,654 | 39.3% | 34.8% | |
| 51.20% | 125 | 1.0 | 741 | 13,652 | 55.0% | 47.7% | |
| 43.55% | 124 | 1.0 | 736 | 13,148 | 48.1% | 40.0% | |
| 38.84% | 121 | 1.0 | 776 | 12,910 | 26.0% | 47.9% | |
| 38.38% | 99 | 1.0 | 793 | 13,526 | 33.3% | 41.7% | |
| 38.78% | 98 | 1.1 | 749 | 12,522 | 32.6% | 43.6% | |
| 53.06% | 98 | 0.9 | 826 | 14,287 | 60.0% | 49.2% | |
| 42.86% | 91 | 1.1 | 799 | 13,757 | 41.0% | 44.2% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 1.1 | 747 | 13,718 | 38.5% | 56.3% | |
| 48.81% | 84 | 0.9 | 836 | 13,812 | 54.5% | 45.1% | |
| 56.58% | 76 | 1.0 | 798 | 13,342 | 66.7% | 48.8% | |
| 44.44% | 72 | 1.0 | 745 | 13,084 | 41.2% | 47.4% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,611 | 37.5% | 55.9% | |
| 51.72% | 58 | 1.1 | 847 | 14,345 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 1.1 | 889 | 14,270 | 63.6% | 38.2% | |
| 49.06% | 53 | 1.3 | 862 | 13,926 | 42.9% | 53.1% | |
| 32.08% | 53 | 0.9 | 782 | 11,795 | 27.6% | 37.5% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 1.0 | 830 | 14,127 | 44.4% | 56.3% | |
| 36.17% | 47 | 1.0 | 727 | 12,703 | 28.6% | 42.3% | |
| 39.13% | 46 | 1.1 | 761 | 12,925 | 43.5% | 34.8% | |
| 61.36% | 44 | 1.3 | 755 | 12,238 | 58.3% | 65.0% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 0.9 | 895 | 14,080 | 40.0% | 51.7% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 1.1 | 778 | 13,445 | 56.3% | 61.5% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 1.0 | 788 | 11,711 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 1.0 | 917 | 13,400 | 43.8% | 62.5% | |
| 41.03% | 39 | 0.8 | 712 | 12,373 | 53.3% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 1.4 | 935 | 13,247 | 61.1% | 55.6% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 1.8 | 873 | 14,326 | 56.3% | 55.0% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.1 | 851 | 13,752 | 50.0% | 38.1% | |
| 34.29% | 35 | 1.0 | 715 | 12,286 | 22.7% | 53.9% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.0 | 872 | 13,401 | 40.0% | 45.0% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 0.9 | 766 | 12,552 | 47.1% | 56.3% | |
| 40.63% | 32 | 1.1 | 817 | 13,006 | 37.5% | 43.8% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 2.0 | 806 | 13,267 | 43.8% | 42.9% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 1.1 | 748 | 14,138 | 60.0% | 47.4% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 1.0 | 783 | 12,816 | 31.3% | 53.9% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.8 | 729 | 12,646 | 33.3% | 56.3% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 3.0 | 795 | 13,859 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 794 | 14,228 | 80.0% | 53.3% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.3 | 790 | 13,487 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 26.09% | 23 | 1.3 | 653 | 12,140 | 18.2% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 1.2 | 911 | 14,604 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.1 | 1,048 | 13,915 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 1.1 | 856 | 13,439 | 22.2% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.1 | 739 | 12,134 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 2.2 | 824 | 12,621 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.1 | 872 | 14,378 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 2.4 | 957 | 12,329 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.0 | 824 | 12,198 | 85.7% | 45.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.0 | 776 | 14,016 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.0 | 744 | 13,921 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.7 | 851 | 13,759 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.5 | 902 | 13,036 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.7 | 930 | 14,072 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 2.4 | 681 | 11,745 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 3.0 | 721 | 12,657 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.6 | 836 | 13,668 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.6 | 636 | 11,505 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.5 | 823 | 12,176 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 0.9 | 813 | 12,633 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 4.0 | 896 | 12,502 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.1 | 1,042 | 15,400 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 1.6 | 769 | 13,882 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.0 | 779 | 13,903 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 925 | 12,206 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.0 | 657 | 12,471 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.7 | 720 | 11,756 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.2 | 576 | 9,504 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.3 | 746 | 10,738 | 16.7% | 100.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.4 | 728 | 12,889 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 0.7 | 643 | 12,353 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.2 | 567 | 10,620 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.8 | 859 | 11,721 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.1 | 786 | 11,221 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.2 | 689 | 11,840 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.8 | 596 | 10,951 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 660 | 11,534 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.1 | 1,361 | 18,557 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 0.9 | 609 | 11,548 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 1,073 | 18,069 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.7 | 929 | 12,781 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.3 | 729 | 8,769 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.0 | 1,168 | 15,663 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 793 | 8,856 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 571 | 11,622 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 667 | 10,415 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 1,047 | 12,829 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 818 | 10,670 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 997 | 12,266 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Rengar vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Rengar do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Ambessa wins the Rengar vs Ambessa matchup with a 73.9% win rate compared to Rengar's 26.1%, a 47.8 percentage point difference. This data is based on 23 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Rengar do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against Rengar with a 81.8% win rate versus 18.2%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Rengar do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Ambessa takes over the Rengar vs Ambessa matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Ambessa scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Rengar vs Ambessa matchup?
Ambessa wins the matchup against Rengar with a 73.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 47.8 percentage point advantage means Ambessa is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 23 games analyzed.
What is the best Rengar build against Ambessa?
The best Rengar build against Ambessa includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra, Umbral Glaive with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Rengar runes against Ambessa?
The best Rengar runes against Ambessa use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Rengar vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Rengar counter Ambessa?
No, Rengar struggles against Ambessa with only a 26.1% win rate. Ambessa has the advantage in this matchup. Rengar players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ambessa's lead.
How do I play Rengar against Ambessa?
When playing Rengar against Ambessa, play cautiously and avoid Ambessa's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ambessa has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.