
Talonvs Ambessa
Talon vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Ambessa wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Talon based on 21 games. Talon wins the early laning phase while Ambessa scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Talon build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Talon vs Ambessa matchup.
Talon Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Talon performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Talon vs Ambessa Matchup?

Talon vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Talon vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 21 recent matches analyzed, Ambessa wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Talon's 33.3%, giving Ambessa a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Talon controls the early laning stage, but Ambessa outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Talon needs to press advantages before Ambessa reaches their power spikes, while Ambessa should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Ambessa leads by 0.2s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ambessa has a strong advantage in this matchup. Talon players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ambessa overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Talon vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against Talon, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Talon Build Against Ambessa
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Talon needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Talon against Ambessa are Voltaic Cyclosword, Umbral Glaive and Youmuu's Ghostblade. This combination gives Talon an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Talon vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Talon dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.6% win rate — a 11.1 percentage point lead over Ambessa. This lopsided early game means Talon can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ambessa is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 83.3% win rate — 66.7 points above Talon. Extended games heavily favor Ambessa, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Talon must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Ambessa reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Ambessa survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Talon Runes Against Ambessa
The Precision and Inspiration rune setup gives Talon the best tools to compete against Ambessa in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Talon matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Talon's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Talon build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.29% | 140 | 1.3 | 837 | 14,020 | 54.8% | 53.9% | |
| 45.93% | 135 | 3.0 | 837 | 13,206 | 43.8% | 47.9% | |
| 51.61% | 124 | 1.1 | 752 | 12,757 | 58.5% | 44.1% | |
| 47.50% | 120 | 1.1 | 844 | 13,584 | 61.8% | 35.4% | |
| 46.60% | 103 | 1.2 | 813 | 13,074 | 41.3% | 50.9% | |
| 47.06% | 102 | 1.3 | 867 | 13,401 | 41.3% | 51.8% | |
| 50.50% | 101 | 1.1 | 857 | 13,870 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 39.13% | 92 | 2.3 | 927 | 12,986 | 34.1% | 43.8% | |
| 48.31% | 89 | 4.8 | 874 | 12,770 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 81 | 6.2 | 912 | 12,590 | 45.5% | 62.5% | |
| 48.15% | 81 | 2.7 | 985 | 14,188 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 43.59% | 78 | 6.0 | 894 | 13,834 | 34.6% | 48.1% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 3.9 | 977 | 13,689 | 43.3% | 55.3% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.4 | 864 | 14,237 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 54.17% | 72 | 6.3 | 932 | 13,115 | 63.0% | 48.9% | |
| 41.67% | 72 | 1.1 | 796 | 14,232 | 48.1% | 37.8% | |
| 53.52% | 71 | 3.6 | 967 | 14,349 | 54.2% | 53.2% | |
| 50.00% | 68 | 1.3 | 878 | 14,024 | 53.6% | 47.5% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 5.9 | 965 | 12,152 | 44.4% | 52.5% | |
| 46.15% | 65 | 1.2 | 863 | 14,209 | 53.9% | 41.0% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 1.0 | 730 | 13,553 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 41.82% | 55 | 6.2 | 977 | 12,047 | 48.3% | 34.6% | |
| 62.96% | 54 | 1.2 | 924 | 13,299 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.3 | 886 | 11,363 | 52.0% | 48.1% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 1.3 | 785 | 13,611 | 56.0% | 30.8% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 1.4 | 780 | 13,706 | 58.8% | 44.1% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 1.2 | 744 | 13,755 | 47.4% | 45.2% | |
| 42.00% | 50 | 6.2 | 868 | 12,538 | 29.4% | 48.5% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 6.3 | 863 | 13,296 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 1.2 | 763 | 12,827 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 6.0 | 969 | 12,278 | 52.9% | 41.7% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 1.2 | 811 | 13,019 | 42.1% | 72.7% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.6 | 778 | 14,390 | 41.2% | 60.9% | |
| 38.46% | 39 | 5.6 | 795 | 12,859 | 45.5% | 35.7% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 6.5 | 895 | 12,607 | 52.4% | 53.3% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 6.1 | 831 | 10,778 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 1.2 | 849 | 13,213 | 42.1% | 47.1% | |
| 36.11% | 36 | 1.4 | 825 | 12,542 | 31.3% | 40.0% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 6.5 | 985 | 11,827 | 57.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 5.8 | 848 | 13,220 | 10.0% | 61.9% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.2 | 810 | 12,927 | 43.8% | 53.3% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 1.5 | 869 | 13,939 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 1.1 | 847 | 15,175 | 54.5% | 47.4% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 6.1 | 1,069 | 12,492 | 38.5% | 37.5% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 1.2 | 940 | 14,288 | 46.1% | 31.3% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.1 | 922 | 13,499 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 1.1 | 1,024 | 15,297 | 62.5% | 36.8% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.5 | 885 | 13,750 | 61.5% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 6.0 | 1,013 | 12,032 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 1.2 | 930 | 13,685 | 73.3% | 54.5% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 6.6 | 1,002 | 11,927 | 11.1% | 52.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.8 | 840 | 11,954 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 1,027 | 12,351 | 53.3% | 80.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 941 | 13,295 | 27.3% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 4.5 | 832 | 12,506 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.5 | 944 | 11,942 | 66.7% | 26.7% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.4 | 858 | 15,424 | 33.3% | 52.9% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.3 | 923 | 12,884 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 5.9 | 889 | 13,484 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 3.8 | 871 | 13,128 | 87.5% | 53.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.1 | 926 | 13,555 | 37.5% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.3 | 766 | 11,614 | 45.5% | 54.5% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 0.9 | 803 | 13,100 | 45.5% | 72.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.9 | 752 | 11,810 | 38.5% | 66.7% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.9 | 904 | 13,196 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.2 | 754 | 10,196 | 80.0% | 41.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 1.4 | 775 | 12,204 | 30.8% | 37.5% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.4 | 877 | 13,031 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 1.1 | 959 | 14,577 | 55.6% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 842 | 14,330 | 75.0% | 43.8% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.4 | 835 | 13,047 | 66.7% | 23.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.2 | 729 | 14,079 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 6.3 | 833 | 11,295 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 3.8 | 922 | 14,997 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 4.8 | 940 | 12,029 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 2.6 | 880 | 13,527 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 6.0 | 789 | 12,427 | 28.6% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 4.2 | 928 | 13,689 | 16.7% | 44.4% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.4 | 884 | 10,132 | 71.4% | 57.1% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 4.6 | 1,144 | 15,539 | 60.0% | 77.8% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.1 | 874 | 12,627 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 2.4 | 761 | 13,212 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 0.9 | 975 | 11,355 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 3.3 | 786 | 11,605 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 2.2 | 868 | 14,296 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 4.5 | 655 | 12,488 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 892 | 13,903 | 20.0% | 14.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.1 | 891 | 11,774 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.5 | 784 | 12,683 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 3.4 | 1,113 | 14,871 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 1.9 | 817 | 10,996 | 14.3% | 25.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 4.3 | 812 | 12,161 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.9 | 1,302 | 17,396 | 100.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 909 | 13,995 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 811 | 13,930 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 10.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 794 | 10,652 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.5 | 808 | 11,689 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.8 | 749 | 13,547 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 910 | 12,858 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.6 | 1,229 | 15,578 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.0 | 733 | 12,940 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.8 | 1,067 | 14,280 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.1 | 686 | 9,520 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 14,579 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 912 | 13,521 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 792 | 12,680 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 962 | 11,047 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 782 | 17,232 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 1,021 | 17,030 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 718 | 11,410 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 965 | 11,411 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 1,034 | 16,002 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 972 | 14,428 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Talon vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Talon do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Ambessa wins the Talon vs Ambessa matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Talon's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 21 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Talon do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Talon has the advantage against Ambessa with a 55.6% win rate versus 44.4%. Talon players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Talon do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Ambessa takes over the Talon vs Ambessa matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to 16.7%. Ambessa scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Talon vs Ambessa matchup?
Ambessa wins the matchup against Talon with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Ambessa is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 21 games analyzed.
What is the best Talon build against Ambessa?
The best Talon build against Ambessa includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Umbral Glaive, Youmuu's Ghostblade with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Talon runes against Ambessa?
The best Talon runes against Ambessa use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Talon vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Talon counter Ambessa?
No, Talon struggles against Ambessa with only a 33.3% win rate. Ambessa has the advantage in this matchup. Talon players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ambessa's lead.
How do I play Talon against Ambessa?
When playing Talon against Ambessa, play cautiously and avoid Ambessa's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ambessa has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
