Trundlevs Ambessa
Trundle vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Trundle wins with a 58.3% win rate (+16.7%) over Ambessa based on 24 games. Trundle holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup.
Trundle Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Trundle performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Trundle vs Ambessa Matchup?
Trundle vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Trundle vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 24 recent matches analyzed, Trundle wins with a 58.3% win rate compared to Ambessa's 41.7%, giving Trundle a 16.7 percentage point advantage. Trundle dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ambessa players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Trundle leads by 0.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Trundle players can confidently pick into Ambessa and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Ambessa away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Trundle vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Trundle is favored during the laning phase against Ambessa, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Trundle holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Trundle Build Against Ambessa
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Trundle needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Trundle against Ambessa are Dead Man's Plate, Blade of The Ruined King and Trinity Force. This combination gives Trundle an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Trundle75.0%
Ambessa25.0%Trundle50.0%Ambessa50.0%Trundle dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 75.0% win rate — a 50.0 percentage point lead over Ambessa. This lopsided early game means Trundle can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Trundle at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Ambessa. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
Trundle holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ambessa players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Trundle Runes Against Ambessa
Precision
Sorcery
Running Precision primary with Sorcery secondary allows Trundle to press their advantage against Ambessa, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Trundle matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Trundle's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.45% | 111 | 6.9 | 755 | 12,658 | 47.5% | 52.1% | |
| 50.55% | 91 | 5.6 | 570 | 12,202 | 50.0% | 50.9% | |
| 47.73% | 88 | 6.4 | 877 | 13,314 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 43.53% | 85 | 5.6 | 729 | 12,431 | 40.0% | 46.0% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.2 | 740 | 12,259 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 6.7 | 650 | 12,317 | 42.4% | 56.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 2.3 | 593 | 12,003 | 43.6% | 57.9% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.0 | 689 | 12,089 | 53.1% | 57.1% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 3.0 | 702 | 12,070 | 50.0% | 45.7% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,098 | 12,175 | 50.0% | 48.6% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.5 | 804 | 11,766 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 37.10% | 62 | 5.4 | 699 | 12,141 | 38.1% | 36.6% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 6.4 | 805 | 12,005 | 44.4% | 35.3% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 6.7 | 810 | 12,383 | 61.5% | 42.9% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 3.1 | 779 | 11,925 | 52.0% | 57.1% | |
| 56.86% | 51 | 6.3 | 756 | 12,266 | 60.9% | 53.6% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 6.7 | 714 | 10,939 | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 6.6 | 763 | 12,848 | 57.9% | 46.7% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 6.1 | 764 | 11,900 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.4 | 586 | 10,894 | 51.7% | 40.0% | |
| 36.73% | 49 | 1.7 | 629 | 12,549 | 34.8% | 38.5% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 1.4 | 607 | 11,844 | 65.0% | 34.6% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.9 | 690 | 12,120 | 54.5% | 36.4% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 1.4 | 646 | 12,295 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.9 | 773 | 12,928 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.3 | 736 | 12,402 | 58.8% | 56.0% | |
| 36.59% | 41 | 6.1 | 642 | 11,277 | 38.1% | 35.0% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 7.0 | 802 | 12,492 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.6 | 560 | 13,731 | 45.5% | 60.7% | |
| 34.21% | 38 | 6.7 | 791 | 12,566 | 35.7% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 5.4 | 601 | 11,758 | 66.7% | 47.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.9 | 589 | 11,609 | 42.1% | 75.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.4 | 605 | 12,517 | 63.6% | 47.6% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.0 | 765 | 11,534 | 60.0% | 29.4% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 6.2 | 886 | 12,738 | 56.3% | 62.5% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 3.6 | 671 | 12,230 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 2.2 | 569 | 13,476 | 28.6% | 31.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.6 | 744 | 12,864 | 64.3% | 40.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 3.4 | 607 | 13,355 | 16.7% | 58.8% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.4 | 609 | 13,001 | 61.5% | 46.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.4 | 792 | 12,108 | 42.9% | 46.1% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.6 | 581 | 13,114 | 41.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 776 | 12,551 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.5 | 745 | 13,692 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 822 | 13,460 | 45.5% | 38.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.5 | 677 | 13,146 | 45.5% | 66.7% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 7.6 | 776 | 13,896 | 70.0% | 53.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.7 | 757 | 11,957 | 61.5% | 70.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.9 | 658 | 12,110 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.9 | 584 | 11,806 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.2 | 648 | 12,265 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 601 | 12,753 | 71.4% | 38.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.5 | 1,091 | 13,552 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.9 | 750 | 12,651 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 11,896 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.6 | 544 | 9,841 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 12,294 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 5.8 | 709 | 11,276 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.9 | 796 | 14,694 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.0 | 699 | 13,527 | 100.0% | 53.9% | |
| 25.00% | 16 | 1.9 | 590 | 13,391 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 616 | 12,672 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.2 | 525 | 11,726 | 16.7% | 22.2% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 756 | 12,708 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 2.4 | 578 | 13,365 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.3 | 630 | 10,277 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 2.2 | 644 | 13,429 | 20.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.4 | 581 | 13,773 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 2.2 | 552 | 12,119 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.9 | 830 | 15,916 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 640 | 13,574 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 634 | 13,977 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 613 | 11,276 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 1.4 | 631 | 12,369 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.5 | 769 | 14,131 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 620 | 10,041 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.5 | 677 | 11,463 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 771 | 10,707 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.5 | 477 | 12,717 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 748 | 11,493 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 706 | 13,796 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 614 | 12,577 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.0 | 546 | 13,323 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.0 | 889 | 12,031 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.2 | 497 | 10,398 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 356 | 8,392 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 764 | 13,121 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 534 | 11,015 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 676 | 14,130 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 512 | 11,908 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.5 | 626 | 11,773 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.0 | 611 | 10,252 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 753 | 14,206 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 453 | 10,729 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 394 | 9,764 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.8 | 693 | 13,534 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 459 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.0 | 442 | 10,986 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 867 | 11,783 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 562 | 12,052 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 667 | 14,367 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 417 | 10,691 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 431 | 10,143 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 723 | 10,425 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Trundle vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Trundle do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Trundle wins the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup with a 58.3% win rate compared to Ambessa's 41.7%, a 16.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 24 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Trundle do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Trundle has the advantage against Ambessa with a 75.0% win rate versus 25.0%. Trundle players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Trundle do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Trundle takes over the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Trundle scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup?
Trundle wins the matchup against Ambessa with a 58.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 16.7 percentage point advantage means Trundle is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 24 games analyzed.
What is the best Trundle build against Ambessa?
The best Trundle build against Ambessa includes Dead Man's Plate, Blade of The Ruined King, Trinity Force with Mercury's Treads. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Trundle runes against Ambessa?
The best Trundle runes against Ambessa use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Trundle counter Ambessa?
Yes, Trundle has a favorable matchup against Ambessa with a 58.3% win rate. Trundle strongly counters Ambessa in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Trundle against Ambessa?
When playing Trundle against Ambessa, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.