Trundlevs Ambessa
Trundle vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Ambessa wins with a 52.9% win rate (+5.9%) over Trundle based on 17 games. Ambessa wins the early laning phase while Trundle scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup.
Trundle Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Trundle performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Ambessa(47.1%)Who Wins the Trundle vs Ambessa Matchup?
Trundle vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Trundle vs Ambessa matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Ambessa wins with a 52.9% win rate compared to Trundle's 47.1%, giving Ambessa a 5.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ambessa controls the early laning stage, but Trundle outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ambessa needs to press advantages before Trundle reaches their power spikes, while Trundle should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Ambessa leads by 231 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Ambessa is slightly favored, Trundle can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Ambessa's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Trundle vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against Trundle, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Trundle Build Against Ambessa
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Trundle needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Trundle against Ambessa are Hullbreaker, Trinity Force and Ravenous Hydra. This combination gives Trundle an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Trundle33.3%Ambessa66.7%Trundle62.5%Ambessa37.5%Ambessa dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Trundle. This lopsided early game means Ambessa can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Trundle is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 62.5% win rate — 25.0 points above Ambessa. Extended games heavily favor Trundle, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Ambessa must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Trundle reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Trundle survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Trundle Runes Against Ambessa
Precision
Domination
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Trundle the best tools to compete against Ambessa in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Trundle matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Trundle's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.81% | 103 | 6.7 | 738 | 12,712 | 40.0% | 39.6% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 6.0 | 770 | 12,530 | 73.1% | 42.4% | |
| 42.37% | 59 | 6.0 | 703 | 12,516 | 52.0% | 35.3% | |
| 61.11% | 54 | 3.5 | 884 | 11,589 | 58.6% | 64.0% | |
| 62.75% | 51 | 2.2 | 687 | 13,143 | 65.2% | 60.7% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 1.9 | 597 | 12,595 | 63.6% | 47.8% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 5.1 | 551 | 12,190 | 41.7% | 40.0% | |
| 65.85% | 41 | 4.2 | 677 | 11,961 | 61.1% | 69.6% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 4.6 | 585 | 11,407 | 33.3% | 45.0% | |
| 62.50% | 40 | 1.3 | 578 | 12,646 | 62.5% | 62.5% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 2.2 | 646 | 11,429 | 47.6% | 38.9% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 5.9 | 785 | 11,839 | 52.2% | 43.8% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 1.7 | 644 | 12,708 | 57.1% | 36.0% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 5.5 | 778 | 13,165 | 60.0% | 52.4% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 7.0 | 775 | 12,117 | 42.9% | 64.3% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.1 | 613 | 11,673 | 62.5% | 38.9% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 1.9 | 641 | 12,816 | 47.4% | 26.7% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.5 | 794 | 13,543 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 5.4 | 759 | 12,501 | 55.0% | 30.8% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 5.1 | 565 | 12,242 | 45.5% | 52.4% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 7.0 | 903 | 12,495 | 58.8% | 66.7% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 5.5 | 840 | 12,037 | 25.0% | 35.3% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.3 | 766 | 12,731 | 69.2% | 40.0% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 7.0 | 783 | 11,844 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 7.4 | 741 | 13,633 | 42.9% | 26.3% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 7.0 | 692 | 13,125 | 90.9% | 46.7% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 7.1 | 767 | 12,902 | 54.5% | 42.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.2 | 826 | 13,207 | 57.1% | 68.8% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.5 | 697 | 11,735 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 1.4 | 594 | 12,825 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.5 | 829 | 13,056 | 55.6% | 58.3% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.4 | 848 | 12,666 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.8 | 766 | 13,520 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 885 | 11,749 | 46.1% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 561 | 11,819 | 53.9% | 42.9% | |
| 80.00% | 20 | 7.0 | 846 | 11,576 | 84.6% | 71.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 7.5 | 727 | 11,756 | 41.7% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.8 | 781 | 11,423 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.9 | 582 | 12,946 | 54.5% | 42.9% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.6 | 522 | 11,387 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.6 | 622 | 11,915 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.4 | 782 | 14,296 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.6 | 723 | 14,287 | 80.0% | 58.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.6 | 701 | 13,275 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.4 | 664 | 12,378 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.7 | 715 | 11,455 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.0 | 659 | 12,818 | 71.4% | 37.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.5 | 696 | 13,395 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 1.8 | 597 | 13,162 | 60.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.0 | 737 | 10,862 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 3.3 | 535 | 11,402 | 40.0% | 11.1% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.6 | 519 | 9,401 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.3 | 816 | 11,246 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.3 | 631 | 13,782 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.7 | 678 | 13,889 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 1.3 | 568 | 12,275 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.5 | 620 | 12,292 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 594 | 13,802 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.1 | 477 | 10,257 | 28.6% | 25.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.7 | 667 | 11,971 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.6 | 709 | 12,406 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 583 | 10,205 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.8 | 774 | 11,170 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 660 | 14,079 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.8 | 780 | 14,136 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.8 | 851 | 14,741 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.6 | 550 | 10,980 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 569 | 11,615 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 401 | 7,523 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 537 | 10,324 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 616 | 11,010 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 574 | 12,734 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.5 | 727 | 16,406 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 0.8 | 518 | 10,554 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.2 | 626 | 11,914 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.9 | 573 | 13,866 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.0 | 541 | 11,729 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.8 | 560 | 12,286 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.6 | 507 | 12,179 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.7 | 473 | 12,750 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 518 | 13,973 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 586 | 14,252 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 533 | 12,926 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 447 | 10,720 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 386 | 9,531 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 674 | 14,007 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 359 | 9,866 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 781 | 12,268 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Trundle vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Trundle do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Ambessa wins the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup with a 52.9% win rate compared to Trundle's 47.1%, a 5.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Trundle do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against Trundle with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Trundle do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Trundle takes over the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to 37.5%. Trundle scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup?
Ambessa wins the matchup against Trundle with a 52.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 5.9 percentage point advantage means Ambessa is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Trundle build against Ambessa?
The best Trundle build against Ambessa includes Hullbreaker, Trinity Force, Ravenous Hydra with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Trundle runes against Ambessa?
The best Trundle runes against Ambessa use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Trundle vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Trundle counter Ambessa?
No, Trundle struggles against Ambessa with only a 47.1% win rate. Ambessa has the advantage in this matchup. Trundle players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ambessa's lead.
How do I play Trundle against Ambessa?
When playing Trundle against Ambessa, play cautiously and avoid Ambessa's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Ambessa in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.