Trundlevs Gangplank
Trundle vs Gangplank is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Trundle wins with a 55.8% win rate (+11.6%) over Gangplank based on 43 games. Trundle holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Trundle vs Gangplank matchup.
Trundle Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Trundle performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Trundle vs Gangplank Matchup?
Trundle vs Gangplank Matchup Summary
The Trundle vs Gangplank matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 43 recent matches analyzed, Trundle wins with a 55.8% win rate compared to Gangplank's 44.2%, giving Trundle a 11.6 percentage point advantage. Trundle dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Gangplank players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Trundle leads by 981 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Trundle players can confidently pick into Gangplank and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Gangplank away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Trundle vs Gangplank Laning Phase Breakdown
Trundle is favored during the laning phase against Gangplank, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Trundle holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Trundle Build Against Gangplank
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Gangplank, providing the mobility and stats Trundle needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Trundle against Gangplank are Hullbreaker, Trinity Force and Ravenous Hydra. This combination gives Trundle an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Gangplank. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Trundle vs Gangplank matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Trundle63.2%
Gangplank36.8%Trundle50.0%Gangplank50.0%Trundle dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 63.2% win rate — a 26.3 percentage point lead over Gangplank. This lopsided early game means Trundle can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Trundle at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Gangplank. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
Trundle holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Gangplank players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Trundle Runes Against Gangplank
Precision
Resolve
Running Precision primary with Resolve secondary allows Trundle to press their advantage against Gangplank, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Trundle matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Trundle's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.45% | 111 | 6.9 | 755 | 12,658 | 47.5% | 52.1% | |
| 50.55% | 91 | 5.6 | 570 | 12,202 | 50.0% | 50.9% | |
| 47.73% | 88 | 6.4 | 877 | 13,314 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 43.53% | 85 | 5.6 | 729 | 12,431 | 40.0% | 46.0% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.2 | 740 | 12,259 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 6.7 | 650 | 12,317 | 42.4% | 56.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 2.3 | 593 | 12,003 | 43.6% | 57.9% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.0 | 689 | 12,089 | 53.1% | 57.1% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 3.0 | 702 | 12,070 | 50.0% | 45.7% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,098 | 12,175 | 50.0% | 48.6% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.5 | 804 | 11,766 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 37.10% | 62 | 5.4 | 699 | 12,141 | 38.1% | 36.6% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 6.4 | 805 | 12,005 | 44.4% | 35.3% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 6.7 | 810 | 12,383 | 61.5% | 42.9% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 3.1 | 779 | 11,925 | 52.0% | 57.1% | |
| 56.86% | 51 | 6.3 | 756 | 12,266 | 60.9% | 53.6% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 6.7 | 714 | 10,939 | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 6.6 | 763 | 12,848 | 57.9% | 46.7% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 6.1 | 764 | 11,900 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.4 | 586 | 10,894 | 51.7% | 40.0% | |
| 36.73% | 49 | 1.7 | 629 | 12,549 | 34.8% | 38.5% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 1.4 | 607 | 11,844 | 65.0% | 34.6% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.9 | 690 | 12,120 | 54.5% | 36.4% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 1.4 | 646 | 12,295 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.9 | 773 | 12,928 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.3 | 736 | 12,402 | 58.8% | 56.0% | |
| 36.59% | 41 | 6.1 | 642 | 11,277 | 38.1% | 35.0% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 7.0 | 802 | 12,492 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.6 | 560 | 13,731 | 45.5% | 60.7% | |
| 34.21% | 38 | 6.7 | 791 | 12,566 | 35.7% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 5.4 | 601 | 11,758 | 66.7% | 47.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.9 | 589 | 11,609 | 42.1% | 75.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.4 | 605 | 12,517 | 63.6% | 47.6% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.0 | 765 | 11,534 | 60.0% | 29.4% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 6.2 | 886 | 12,738 | 56.3% | 62.5% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 3.6 | 671 | 12,230 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 2.2 | 569 | 13,476 | 28.6% | 31.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.6 | 744 | 12,864 | 64.3% | 40.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 3.4 | 607 | 13,355 | 16.7% | 58.8% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.4 | 609 | 13,001 | 61.5% | 46.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.4 | 792 | 12,108 | 42.9% | 46.1% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.6 | 581 | 13,114 | 41.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 776 | 12,551 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.5 | 745 | 13,692 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 822 | 13,460 | 45.5% | 38.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.5 | 677 | 13,146 | 45.5% | 66.7% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 7.6 | 776 | 13,896 | 70.0% | 53.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.7 | 757 | 11,957 | 61.5% | 70.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.9 | 658 | 12,110 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.9 | 584 | 11,806 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.2 | 648 | 12,265 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 601 | 12,753 | 71.4% | 38.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.5 | 1,091 | 13,552 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.9 | 750 | 12,651 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 11,896 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.6 | 544 | 9,841 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 12,294 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 5.8 | 709 | 11,276 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.9 | 796 | 14,694 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.0 | 699 | 13,527 | 100.0% | 53.9% | |
| 25.00% | 16 | 1.9 | 590 | 13,391 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 616 | 12,672 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.2 | 525 | 11,726 | 16.7% | 22.2% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 756 | 12,708 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 2.4 | 578 | 13,365 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.3 | 630 | 10,277 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 2.2 | 644 | 13,429 | 20.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.4 | 581 | 13,773 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 2.2 | 552 | 12,119 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.9 | 830 | 15,916 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 640 | 13,574 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 634 | 13,977 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 613 | 11,276 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 1.4 | 631 | 12,369 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.5 | 769 | 14,131 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 620 | 10,041 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.5 | 677 | 11,463 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 771 | 10,707 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.5 | 477 | 12,717 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 748 | 11,493 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 706 | 13,796 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 614 | 12,577 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.0 | 546 | 13,323 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.0 | 889 | 12,031 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.2 | 497 | 10,398 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 356 | 8,392 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 764 | 13,121 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 534 | 11,015 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 676 | 14,130 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 512 | 11,908 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.5 | 626 | 11,773 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.0 | 611 | 10,252 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 753 | 14,206 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 453 | 10,729 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 394 | 9,764 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.8 | 693 | 13,534 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 459 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.0 | 442 | 10,986 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 867 | 11,783 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 562 | 12,052 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 667 | 14,367 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 417 | 10,691 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 431 | 10,143 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 723 | 10,425 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Trundle vs Gangplank - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Trundle do against Gangplank in League of Legends?
Trundle wins the Trundle vs Gangplank matchup with a 55.8% win rate compared to Gangplank's 44.2%, a 11.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 43 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Trundle do against Gangplank in the early game?
In the early game, Trundle has the advantage against Gangplank with a 63.2% win rate versus 36.8%. Trundle players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Trundle do against Gangplank in the late game?
In the late game, Trundle takes over the Trundle vs Gangplank matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Trundle scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Trundle vs Gangplank matchup?
Trundle wins the matchup against Gangplank with a 55.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 11.6 percentage point advantage means Trundle is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 43 games analyzed.
What is the best Trundle build against Gangplank?
The best Trundle build against Gangplank includes Hullbreaker, Trinity Force, Ravenous Hydra with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Trundle runes against Gangplank?
The best Trundle runes against Gangplank use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 80.0% win rate in the Trundle vs Gangplank matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Trundle counter Gangplank?
Yes, Trundle has a favorable matchup against Gangplank with a 55.8% win rate. Trundle strongly counters Gangplank in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Trundle against Gangplank?
When playing Trundle against Gangplank, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.