Trundlevs Zac
Trundle vs Zac is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Zac wins with a 64.3% win rate (+28.6%) over Trundle based on 14 games. Zac holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Trundle vs Zac matchup.
Trundle Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Trundle performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Trundle vs Zac Matchup?
Trundle vs Zac Matchup Summary
The Trundle vs Zac matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 14 recent matches analyzed, Zac wins with a 64.3% win rate compared to Trundle's 35.7%, giving Zac a 28.6 percentage point advantage. Zac dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Trundle players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Zac leads by 0.7s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Zac has a strong advantage in this matchup. Trundle players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Zac overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Trundle vs Zac Laning Phase Breakdown
Trundle is favored during the laning phase against Zac, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Trundle holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Trundle Build Against Zac
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Zac, providing the mobility and stats Trundle needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Trundle against Zac are Blade of The Ruined King, Trinity Force and Thornmail. This combination gives Trundle an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build has a 25.0% win rate across 4 games. While the overall matchup may be difficult, this item path gives Trundle the best chance to compete against Zac. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Trundle vs Zac matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Trundle20.0%
Zac80.0%Trundle44.4%Zac55.6%Zac dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 80.0% win rate — a 60.0 percentage point lead over Trundle. This lopsided early game means Zac can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zac is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 55.6% win rate — 11.1 points above Trundle. Extended games heavily favor Zac, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Zac holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Trundle players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Trundle Runes Against Zac
Precision
Domination
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Trundle the best tools to compete against Zac in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Trundle matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Trundle's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.45% | 111 | 6.9 | 755 | 12,658 | 47.5% | 52.1% | |
| 50.55% | 91 | 5.6 | 570 | 12,202 | 50.0% | 50.9% | |
| 47.73% | 88 | 6.4 | 877 | 13,314 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 43.53% | 85 | 5.6 | 729 | 12,431 | 40.0% | 46.0% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.2 | 740 | 12,259 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 6.7 | 650 | 12,317 | 42.4% | 56.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 2.3 | 593 | 12,003 | 43.6% | 57.9% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.0 | 689 | 12,089 | 53.1% | 57.1% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 3.0 | 702 | 12,070 | 50.0% | 45.7% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,098 | 12,175 | 50.0% | 48.6% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.5 | 804 | 11,766 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 37.10% | 62 | 5.4 | 699 | 12,141 | 38.1% | 36.6% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 6.4 | 805 | 12,005 | 44.4% | 35.3% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 6.7 | 810 | 12,383 | 61.5% | 42.9% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 3.1 | 779 | 11,925 | 52.0% | 57.1% | |
| 56.86% | 51 | 6.3 | 756 | 12,266 | 60.9% | 53.6% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 6.7 | 714 | 10,939 | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 6.6 | 763 | 12,848 | 57.9% | 46.7% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 6.1 | 764 | 11,900 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.4 | 586 | 10,894 | 51.7% | 40.0% | |
| 36.73% | 49 | 1.7 | 629 | 12,549 | 34.8% | 38.5% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 1.4 | 607 | 11,844 | 65.0% | 34.6% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.9 | 690 | 12,120 | 54.5% | 36.4% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 1.4 | 646 | 12,295 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.9 | 773 | 12,928 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.3 | 736 | 12,402 | 58.8% | 56.0% | |
| 36.59% | 41 | 6.1 | 642 | 11,277 | 38.1% | 35.0% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 7.0 | 802 | 12,492 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.6 | 560 | 13,731 | 45.5% | 60.7% | |
| 34.21% | 38 | 6.7 | 791 | 12,566 | 35.7% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 5.4 | 601 | 11,758 | 66.7% | 47.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.9 | 589 | 11,609 | 42.1% | 75.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.4 | 605 | 12,517 | 63.6% | 47.6% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.0 | 765 | 11,534 | 60.0% | 29.4% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 6.2 | 886 | 12,738 | 56.3% | 62.5% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 3.6 | 671 | 12,230 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 2.2 | 569 | 13,476 | 28.6% | 31.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.6 | 744 | 12,864 | 64.3% | 40.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 3.4 | 607 | 13,355 | 16.7% | 58.8% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.4 | 609 | 13,001 | 61.5% | 46.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.4 | 792 | 12,108 | 42.9% | 46.1% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.6 | 581 | 13,114 | 41.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 776 | 12,551 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.5 | 745 | 13,692 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 822 | 13,460 | 45.5% | 38.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.5 | 677 | 13,146 | 45.5% | 66.7% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 7.6 | 776 | 13,896 | 70.0% | 53.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.7 | 757 | 11,957 | 61.5% | 70.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.9 | 658 | 12,110 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.9 | 584 | 11,806 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.2 | 648 | 12,265 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 601 | 12,753 | 71.4% | 38.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.5 | 1,091 | 13,552 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.9 | 750 | 12,651 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 11,896 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.6 | 544 | 9,841 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 12,294 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 5.8 | 709 | 11,276 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.9 | 796 | 14,694 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.0 | 699 | 13,527 | 100.0% | 53.9% | |
| 25.00% | 16 | 1.9 | 590 | 13,391 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 616 | 12,672 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.2 | 525 | 11,726 | 16.7% | 22.2% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 756 | 12,708 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 2.4 | 578 | 13,365 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.3 | 630 | 10,277 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 2.2 | 644 | 13,429 | 20.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.4 | 581 | 13,773 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 2.2 | 552 | 12,119 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.9 | 830 | 15,916 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 640 | 13,574 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 634 | 13,977 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 613 | 11,276 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 1.4 | 631 | 12,369 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.5 | 769 | 14,131 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 620 | 10,041 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.5 | 677 | 11,463 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 771 | 10,707 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.5 | 477 | 12,717 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 748 | 11,493 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 706 | 13,796 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 614 | 12,577 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.0 | 546 | 13,323 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.0 | 889 | 12,031 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.2 | 497 | 10,398 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 356 | 8,392 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 764 | 13,121 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 534 | 11,015 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 676 | 14,130 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 512 | 11,908 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.5 | 626 | 11,773 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.0 | 611 | 10,252 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 753 | 14,206 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 453 | 10,729 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 394 | 9,764 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.8 | 693 | 13,534 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 459 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.0 | 442 | 10,986 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 867 | 11,783 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 562 | 12,052 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 667 | 14,367 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 417 | 10,691 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 431 | 10,143 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 723 | 10,425 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Trundle vs Zac - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Trundle do against Zac in League of Legends?
Zac wins the Trundle vs Zac matchup with a 64.3% win rate compared to Trundle's 35.7%, a 28.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 14 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Trundle do against Zac in the early game?
In the early game, Zac has the advantage against Trundle with a 80.0% win rate versus 20.0%. Zac players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Trundle do against Zac in the late game?
In the late game, Zac takes over the Trundle vs Zac matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to 44.4%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Trundle vs Zac matchup?
Zac wins the matchup against Trundle with a 64.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 28.6 percentage point advantage means Zac is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 14 games analyzed.
What is the best Trundle build against Zac?
The best Trundle build against Zac includes Blade of The Ruined King, Trinity Force, Thornmail with Mercury's Treads. This build achieves a 25.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Trundle runes against Zac?
The best Trundle runes against Zac use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Trundle vs Zac matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Trundle counter Zac?
No, Trundle struggles against Zac with only a 35.7% win rate. Zac has the advantage in this matchup. Trundle players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Zac's lead.
How do I play Trundle against Zac?
When playing Trundle against Zac, play cautiously and avoid Zac's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Zac has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.