Tryndamerevs Ambessa
Tryndamere vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Tryndamere wins with a 61.8% win rate (+23.5%) over Ambessa based on 34 games. Tryndamere holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Ambessa Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 34 recent matches analyzed, Tryndamere wins with a 61.8% win rate compared to Ambessa's 38.2%, giving Tryndamere a 23.5 percentage point advantage. Tryndamere dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ambessa players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in gold income, where Tryndamere leads by 2,980 gold per game — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tryndamere players can confidently pick into Ambessa and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Ambessa away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Ambessa, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Ambessa
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Ambessa are Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer and Infinity Edge. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 4 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere78.6%
Ambessa21.4%Tryndamere50.0%Ambessa50.0%Tryndamere dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 78.6% win rate — a 57.1 percentage point lead over Ambessa. This lopsided early game means Tryndamere can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Tryndamere at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Ambessa. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
Tryndamere holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ambessa players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Ambessa
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Tryndamere to press their advantage against Ambessa, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.68% | 190 | 7.3 | 952 | 13,359 | 53.0% | 54.2% | |
| 39.72% | 141 | 7.0 | 643 | 11,976 | 32.2% | 45.1% | |
| 54.69% | 128 | 6.7 | 841 | 12,948 | 55.2% | 54.3% | |
| 59.35% | 123 | 6.6 | 838 | 12,182 | 63.8% | 55.4% | |
| 47.93% | 121 | 6.7 | 728 | 13,631 | 44.7% | 49.4% | |
| 53.70% | 108 | 7.0 | 1,040 | 13,383 | 64.0% | 44.8% | |
| 44.76% | 105 | 6.6 | 755 | 11,681 | 35.2% | 54.9% | |
| 54.90% | 102 | 7.0 | 961 | 13,486 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 96 | 7.1 | 808 | 13,071 | 52.4% | 53.7% | |
| 50.59% | 85 | 7.2 | 1,174 | 12,811 | 50.0% | 51.1% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.8 | 866 | 12,431 | 56.3% | 48.1% | |
| 53.01% | 83 | 7.1 | 848 | 12,288 | 65.8% | 42.2% | |
| 59.04% | 83 | 7.0 | 858 | 12,921 | 60.5% | 57.8% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.5 | 863 | 12,687 | 61.8% | 50.0% | |
| 41.10% | 73 | 7.1 | 860 | 12,381 | 47.1% | 35.9% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 7.2 | 948 | 12,625 | 37.1% | 48.6% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.9 | 873 | 13,894 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 7.0 | 827 | 12,151 | 60.0% | 51.9% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 7.0 | 792 | 12,818 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 55 | 6.9 | 927 | 13,303 | 67.9% | 44.4% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 6.3 | 858 | 11,566 | 34.6% | 59.3% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 7.2 | 984 | 12,347 | 51.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 6.6 | 874 | 12,815 | 39.1% | 46.4% | |
| 66.00% | 50 | 4.0 | 907 | 15,163 | 76.5% | 60.6% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 7.0 | 723 | 12,256 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 4.1 | 803 | 13,080 | 31.6% | 55.2% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 6.7 | 905 | 12,431 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 62.50% | 48 | 7.2 | 864 | 12,857 | 61.9% | 63.0% | |
| 58.70% | 46 | 6.6 | 940 | 12,221 | 52.2% | 65.2% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 7.3 | 850 | 13,620 | 47.1% | 46.4% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 7.4 | 1,003 | 14,310 | 60.9% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 7.7 | 865 | 13,360 | 53.3% | 47.8% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 5.4 | 932 | 13,310 | 66.7% | 59.1% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.7 | 853 | 12,246 | 50.0% | 63.2% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 6.3 | 865 | 12,754 | 58.8% | 30.0% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 7.1 | 825 | 12,755 | 33.3% | 47.4% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 7.2 | 878 | 14,061 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 6.3 | 720 | 11,878 | 64.3% | 54.5% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 6.8 | 859 | 12,827 | 46.7% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.5 | 948 | 11,225 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 6.8 | 898 | 14,490 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 34 | 6.0 | 692 | 12,431 | 81.3% | 50.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 7.2 | 762 | 12,655 | 33.3% | 47.1% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 3.0 | 829 | 13,570 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 2.3 | 733 | 13,306 | 30.0% | 56.3% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 4.2 | 815 | 13,270 | 69.2% | 69.2% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 7.1 | 787 | 11,838 | 53.9% | 83.3% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.7 | 713 | 11,504 | 16.7% | 84.6% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 4.2 | 1,066 | 14,660 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 840 | 12,796 | 58.3% | 46.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.4 | 683 | 12,067 | 42.9% | 70.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 2.3 | 842 | 14,578 | 30.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 7.0 | 849 | 15,411 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 4.3 | 689 | 10,890 | 45.5% | 30.0% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 6.9 | 999 | 13,090 | 38.5% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.4 | 703 | 13,346 | 40.0% | 72.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 7.3 | 734 | 13,494 | 37.5% | 30.8% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 675 | 12,120 | 77.8% | 36.4% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 2.4 | 683 | 13,726 | 62.5% | 81.8% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 7.3 | 657 | 12,275 | 71.4% | 58.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.3 | 886 | 14,659 | 42.9% | 58.3% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 7.1 | 989 | 14,397 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.7 | 766 | 12,223 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 3.3 | 820 | 14,697 | 40.0% | 38.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.9 | 712 | 11,788 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.1 | 765 | 11,832 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.9 | 1,055 | 13,125 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 1,019 | 13,710 | 87.5% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.3 | 947 | 15,419 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 2.0 | 785 | 12,572 | 57.1% | 87.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.3 | 790 | 13,343 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.0 | 650 | 12,565 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 3.4 | 753 | 12,322 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.7 | 735 | 14,474 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.3 | 823 | 12,075 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 2.6 | 1,023 | 12,951 | 85.7% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 952 | 14,209 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 908 | 12,470 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 982 | 12,012 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 7.1 | 817 | 14,854 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 709 | 12,526 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.1 | 987 | 13,786 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 806 | 13,142 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.3 | 664 | 11,471 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 726 | 12,814 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 3.3 | 811 | 12,787 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.3 | 1,021 | 15,477 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 7.9 | 1,088 | 14,650 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 676 | 11,655 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 1,002 | 12,719 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.1 | 908 | 12,693 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.9 | 834 | 11,895 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 848 | 15,066 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.5 | 766 | 11,995 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 701 | 12,621 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.8 | 657 | 12,846 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.5 | 852 | 13,552 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 591 | 14,046 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 688 | 12,376 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.3 | 804 | 13,994 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 945 | 16,869 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 971 | 15,867 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 904 | 13,661 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 788 | 11,787 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 835 | 14,329 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 751 | 16,641 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 654 | 15,474 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 936 | 16,716 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 1,079 | 13,622 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 7.5 | 874 | 13,968 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 961 | 12,290 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 639 | 10,604 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 712 | 10,256 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Tryndamere wins the Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup with a 61.8% win rate compared to Ambessa's 38.2%, a 23.5 percentage point difference. This data is based on 34 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Tryndamere do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Tryndamere has the advantage against Ambessa with a 78.6% win rate versus 21.4%. Tryndamere players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Tryndamere takes over the Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Tryndamere scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup?
Tryndamere wins the matchup against Ambessa with a 61.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 23.5 percentage point advantage means Tryndamere is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 34 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Ambessa?
The best Tryndamere build against Ambessa includes Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer, Infinity Edge with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Ambessa?
The best Tryndamere runes against Ambessa use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Ambessa?
Yes, Tryndamere has a favorable matchup against Ambessa with a 61.8% win rate. Tryndamere strongly counters Ambessa in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Tryndamere against Ambessa?
When playing Tryndamere against Ambessa, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.