Tryndamerevs Neeko
Tryndamere vs Neeko is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Tryndamere wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Neeko based on 10 games. Tryndamere wins the early laning phase while Neeko scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Neeko(50.0%)Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Neeko Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Neeko Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 10 recent matches analyzed, Tryndamere wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Neeko's 50.0%, giving Tryndamere a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Tryndamere controls the early laning stage, but Neeko outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Tryndamere needs to press advantages before Neeko reaches their power spikes, while Neeko should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Neeko leads by 1.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tryndamere has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Neeko's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Neeko Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Neeko, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Neeko
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Neeko, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Neeko are Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer and Lord Dominik's Regards. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Neeko. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere66.7%Neeko33.3%Tryndamere42.9%Neeko57.1%Tryndamere dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Neeko. This lopsided early game means Tryndamere can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Neeko is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Tryndamere. Extended games heavily favor Neeko, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Tryndamere must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Neeko reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Neeko survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Neeko
Domination
Precision
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Tryndamere maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Neeko.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.80% | 251 | 7.3 | 930 | 12,861 | 56.4% | 43.2% | |
| 43.75% | 176 | 6.8 | 681 | 11,763 | 43.7% | 43.8% | |
| 44.32% | 176 | 6.4 | 661 | 12,428 | 41.3% | 46.5% | |
| 56.82% | 176 | 6.7 | 860 | 12,366 | 58.3% | 55.4% | |
| 47.67% | 172 | 6.7 | 829 | 12,725 | 46.0% | 49.0% | |
| 45.97% | 124 | 7.4 | 917 | 13,300 | 41.4% | 50.0% | |
| 47.58% | 124 | 6.3 | 756 | 12,676 | 41.1% | 52.9% | |
| 55.56% | 117 | 6.8 | 998 | 13,481 | 55.3% | 55.7% | |
| 48.25% | 114 | 7.1 | 920 | 13,051 | 48.1% | 48.3% | |
| 55.56% | 99 | 7.2 | 986 | 13,401 | 50.0% | 59.0% | |
| 43.88% | 98 | 6.4 | 778 | 12,279 | 40.0% | 48.8% | |
| 41.84% | 98 | 7.1 | 825 | 12,758 | 41.5% | 42.1% | |
| 58.16% | 98 | 7.1 | 798 | 13,295 | 75.0% | 46.5% | |
| 46.32% | 95 | 7.0 | 893 | 12,373 | 48.8% | 44.2% | |
| 51.06% | 94 | 6.9 | 942 | 12,648 | 51.2% | 51.0% | |
| 49.46% | 93 | 7.3 | 871 | 12,199 | 53.1% | 45.5% | |
| 48.89% | 90 | 7.0 | 856 | 12,947 | 51.3% | 47.1% | |
| 54.55% | 88 | 7.1 | 1,252 | 13,035 | 53.5% | 55.6% | |
| 54.55% | 88 | 7.1 | 822 | 13,061 | 57.1% | 52.8% | |
| 63.75% | 80 | 3.4 | 713 | 12,039 | 57.8% | 71.4% | |
| 38.46% | 78 | 7.7 | 835 | 13,006 | 42.4% | 35.6% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 6.7 | 833 | 12,905 | 48.6% | 55.3% | |
| 57.75% | 71 | 7.4 | 944 | 13,877 | 65.1% | 46.4% | |
| 53.52% | 71 | 6.8 | 928 | 11,878 | 51.4% | 55.6% | |
| 55.71% | 70 | 6.8 | 895 | 14,001 | 63.6% | 52.1% | |
| 44.12% | 68 | 4.4 | 825 | 13,350 | 46.4% | 42.5% | |
| 58.82% | 68 | 7.3 | 917 | 13,087 | 62.1% | 56.4% | |
| 40.63% | 64 | 7.2 | 920 | 13,194 | 51.9% | 32.4% | |
| 50.82% | 61 | 5.3 | 925 | 13,712 | 52.2% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 58 | 5.5 | 774 | 14,048 | 57.9% | 46.1% | |
| 59.65% | 57 | 7.1 | 846 | 13,558 | 63.0% | 56.7% | |
| 47.27% | 55 | 6.6 | 908 | 13,111 | 50.0% | 44.8% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 6.8 | 919 | 13,102 | 58.6% | 52.0% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 6.4 | 761 | 12,564 | 42.9% | 40.6% | |
| 58.49% | 53 | 6.5 | 882 | 13,497 | 45.8% | 69.0% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 6.4 | 939 | 12,145 | 52.4% | 43.8% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 6.3 | 875 | 12,767 | 47.8% | 48.1% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 6.3 | 770 | 14,348 | 59.1% | 51.9% | |
| 46.81% | 47 | 6.9 | 777 | 12,962 | 36.8% | 53.6% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 7.3 | 959 | 13,568 | 52.6% | 55.6% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 7.2 | 758 | 11,457 | 48.1% | 66.7% | |
| 43.18% | 44 | 2.7 | 733 | 12,166 | 39.1% | 47.6% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 7.0 | 901 | 13,121 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 7.2 | 805 | 11,975 | 39.1% | 50.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 7.2 | 887 | 13,866 | 64.7% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 7.3 | 1,022 | 12,392 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 65.79% | 38 | 6.8 | 925 | 13,597 | 57.1% | 76.5% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 3.1 | 873 | 13,992 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 1.7 | 716 | 13,855 | 63.2% | 64.7% | |
| 36.11% | 36 | 6.8 | 616 | 12,572 | 53.3% | 23.8% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.4 | 815 | 11,593 | 42.1% | 35.7% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 5.9 | 819 | 13,586 | 33.3% | 57.9% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 1.8 | 770 | 13,986 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 3.1 | 792 | 13,563 | 50.0% | 27.8% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 2.5 | 699 | 13,086 | 47.1% | 46.1% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 4.3 | 813 | 12,532 | 72.7% | 42.1% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 3.0 | 691 | 12,830 | 72.7% | 52.6% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 5.6 | 814 | 14,128 | 12.5% | 47.6% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 2.4 | 671 | 14,509 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 6.7 | 838 | 14,906 | 36.4% | 78.6% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 741 | 12,462 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 2.7 | 726 | 12,321 | 75.0% | 58.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.9 | 941 | 13,489 | 28.6% | 53.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.0 | 764 | 11,880 | 63.6% | 27.3% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 3.0 | 821 | 12,859 | 64.3% | 62.5% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.8 | 698 | 12,593 | 44.4% | 38.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.7 | 861 | 14,308 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 5.4 | 773 | 13,203 | 44.4% | 27.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 5.0 | 825 | 14,160 | 77.8% | 45.5% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 7.1 | 737 | 12,839 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 6.8 | 866 | 13,145 | 70.0% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 7.3 | 793 | 12,951 | 50.0% | 87.5% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.5 | 861 | 15,540 | 80.0% | 53.9% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.7 | 731 | 12,486 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 6.7 | 812 | 12,581 | 37.5% | 30.0% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 2.3 | 688 | 12,672 | 25.0% | 30.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.9 | 881 | 13,641 | 100.0% | 46.1% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.8 | 744 | 13,298 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.6 | 537 | 12,473 | 44.4% | 25.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.2 | 1,057 | 13,353 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.8 | 774 | 13,668 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.8 | 848 | 11,993 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 6.7 | 816 | 13,522 | 80.0% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.4 | 755 | 13,251 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 7.2 | 1,003 | 13,858 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 4.9 | 1,171 | 14,443 | 83.3% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.3 | 725 | 11,480 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.2 | 904 | 13,485 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 7.4 | 960 | 13,950 | 66.7% | 88.9% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.2 | 842 | 13,500 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 4.1 | 715 | 12,769 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.5 | 764 | 12,064 | 16.7% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 846 | 14,039 | 33.3% | 28.6% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 2.6 | 617 | 12,088 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 862 | 11,373 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 627 | 9,625 | 42.9% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 761 | 12,716 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 496 | 8,026 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 653 | 9,899 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 7.5 | 891 | 16,468 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 715 | 12,890 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 844 | 11,622 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.3 | 788 | 11,490 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 921 | 12,258 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 8.3 | 991 | 15,770 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 578 | 11,336 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.1 | 614 | 9,994 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.8 | 702 | 13,029 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 652 | 11,316 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.9 | 1,137 | 14,483 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 689 | 12,842 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.8 | 940 | 13,312 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 639 | 13,555 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 7.7 | 910 | 10,989 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.6 | 815 | 18,935 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 616 | 11,498 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.4 | 1,059 | 13,050 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.6 | 646 | 8,506 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 957 | 13,318 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.2 | 466 | 9,768 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 853 | 10,689 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,042 | 16,111 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Neeko - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Neeko in League of Legends?
Tryndamere wins the Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Neeko's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 10 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Tryndamere do against Neeko in the early game?
In the early game, Tryndamere has the advantage against Neeko with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Tryndamere players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Neeko in the late game?
In the late game, Neeko takes over the Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Neeko scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup?
Tryndamere wins the matchup against Neeko with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Tryndamere is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 10 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Neeko?
The best Tryndamere build against Neeko includes Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer, Lord Dominik's Regards with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Neeko?
The best Tryndamere runes against Neeko use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Neeko matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Neeko?
Yes, Tryndamere has a favorable matchup against Neeko with a 50.0% win rate. Tryndamere slightly edges out Neeko in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Tryndamere against Neeko?
When playing Tryndamere against Neeko, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.