Tryndamerevs Zac
Tryndamere vs Zac is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Zac wins with a 77.8% win rate (+55.6%) over Tryndamere based on 9 games. Zac holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Zac matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Zac(22.2%)Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Zac Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Zac Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Zac matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 9 recent matches analyzed, Zac wins with a 77.8% win rate compared to Tryndamere's 22.2%, giving Zac a 55.6 percentage point advantage. Zac dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Tryndamere players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Zac leads by 1.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Zac has a strong advantage in this matchup. Tryndamere players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Zac overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Zac Laning Phase Breakdown
Zac is favored during the laning phase against Tryndamere, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Zac holds advantages in damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Zac
Gunmetal Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Zac, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Zac are Profane Hydra, Essence Reaver and Infinity Edge. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Zac matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere33.3%Zac66.7%Tryndamere16.7%Zac83.3%Zac dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Tryndamere. This lopsided early game means Zac can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zac is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 83.3% win rate — 66.7 points above Tryndamere. Extended games heavily favor Zac, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Zac holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Tryndamere players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Zac
Domination
Precision
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Tryndamere the best tools to compete against Zac in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.67% | 180 | 7.3 | 950 | 13,703 | 49.4% | 53.6% | |
| 58.16% | 98 | 6.5 | 876 | 13,526 | 53.2% | 62.8% | |
| 45.33% | 75 | 6.8 | 643 | 12,489 | 51.6% | 40.9% | |
| 40.58% | 69 | 6.5 | 818 | 12,240 | 29.4% | 51.4% | |
| 55.22% | 67 | 6.8 | 842 | 12,870 | 65.8% | 41.4% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 7.5 | 959 | 14,321 | 58.6% | 37.8% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 7.5 | 931 | 13,105 | 38.7% | 60.6% | |
| 40.63% | 64 | 6.5 | 877 | 12,387 | 46.4% | 36.1% | |
| 51.67% | 60 | 6.3 | 1,159 | 13,472 | 51.9% | 51.5% | |
| 37.74% | 53 | 6.4 | 595 | 12,997 | 45.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 7.1 | 846 | 13,877 | 42.9% | 47.1% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 7.9 | 922 | 13,892 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 7.0 | 823 | 13,692 | 54.5% | 59.1% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 6.7 | 879 | 13,461 | 28.6% | 63.6% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.8 | 850 | 13,453 | 68.2% | 45.0% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 7.4 | 865 | 12,648 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 6.5 | 835 | 13,346 | 68.4% | 54.5% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 7.2 | 840 | 13,167 | 50.0% | 56.0% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 7.1 | 822 | 13,817 | 68.4% | 36.4% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.1 | 778 | 12,385 | 38.9% | 54.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 4.4 | 948 | 13,256 | 52.2% | 52.9% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 6.5 | 1,041 | 12,824 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 6.9 | 1,002 | 13,254 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 6.4 | 920 | 12,454 | 55.6% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 6.8 | 856 | 12,333 | 47.4% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 3.0 | 795 | 12,553 | 60.0% | 35.7% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 7.4 | 913 | 12,852 | 47.1% | 56.3% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.7 | 860 | 11,453 | 35.3% | 43.8% | |
| 63.64% | 33 | 6.9 | 1,000 | 12,592 | 63.2% | 64.3% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 7.7 | 934 | 14,404 | 41.2% | 53.3% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 7.0 | 814 | 12,569 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.8 | 829 | 12,993 | 46.7% | 78.6% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 7.0 | 795 | 12,501 | 56.3% | 41.7% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 6.1 | 813 | 13,704 | 58.3% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 7.5 | 862 | 15,018 | 70.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.5 | 706 | 12,945 | 45.5% | 60.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 834 | 14,271 | 64.3% | 63.6% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 668 | 12,641 | 64.3% | 63.6% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.8 | 699 | 12,469 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 7.1 | 877 | 13,988 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 2.3 | 744 | 12,888 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.9 | 1,014 | 14,253 | 42.9% | 31.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 4.4 | 856 | 14,685 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.2 | 695 | 14,215 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.7 | 759 | 12,880 | 44.4% | 58.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.7 | 755 | 13,021 | 71.4% | 58.3% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 2.3 | 689 | 12,999 | 25.0% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 7.2 | 699 | 13,840 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.6 | 848 | 13,285 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.9 | 659 | 13,552 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 4.0 | 770 | 14,056 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.8 | 840 | 12,845 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.6 | 839 | 12,968 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.9 | 911 | 11,273 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 4.3 | 771 | 15,204 | 28.6% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 3.7 | 944 | 15,091 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 7.0 | 740 | 12,916 | 83.3% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.3 | 671 | 14,839 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.6 | 813 | 13,028 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.8 | 927 | 15,531 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.0 | 789 | 13,777 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.4 | 625 | 12,468 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 3.4 | 875 | 13,272 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 91.67% | 12 | 1.8 | 732 | 15,408 | 100.0% | 87.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.2 | 1,074 | 13,784 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.8 | 872 | 14,918 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.6 | 847 | 15,172 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.8 | 865 | 14,513 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 1,101 | 15,403 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 10.00% | 10 | 3.9 | 910 | 13,604 | 0.0% | 12.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.1 | 506 | 9,770 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 3.7 | 684 | 12,610 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 5.8 | 976 | 16,595 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 626 | 13,288 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 555 | 9,839 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 645 | 9,649 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.8 | 1,163 | 15,669 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.6 | 745 | 12,303 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 547 | 12,984 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 688 | 14,973 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 733 | 12,389 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.6 | 743 | 13,196 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.1 | 697 | 12,920 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.7 | 1,044 | 10,869 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.7 | 811 | 13,153 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 568 | 11,972 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.5 | 551 | 12,350 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 6.5 | 612 | 10,008 | 16.7% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.2 | 1,035 | 14,081 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 4.9 | 890 | 11,208 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 525 | 10,967 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.7 | 793 | 13,712 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.8 | 728 | 15,335 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 756 | 9,352 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 561 | 11,040 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.8 | 936 | 13,611 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 919 | 16,547 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 583 | 9,838 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 955 | 13,810 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 1,042 | 15,734 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 852 | 18,874 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Zac - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Zac in League of Legends?
Zac wins the Tryndamere vs Zac matchup with a 77.8% win rate compared to Tryndamere's 22.2%, a 55.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 9 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Tryndamere do against Zac in the early game?
In the early game, Zac has the advantage against Tryndamere with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Zac players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Zac in the late game?
In the late game, Zac takes over the Tryndamere vs Zac matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to 16.7%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Zac matchup?
Zac wins the matchup against Tryndamere with a 77.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 55.6 percentage point advantage means Zac is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 9 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Zac?
The best Tryndamere build against Zac includes Profane Hydra, Essence Reaver, Infinity Edge with Gunmetal Greaves. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Zac?
The best Tryndamere runes against Zac use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Zac matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Zac?
No, Tryndamere struggles against Zac with only a 22.2% win rate. Zac has the advantage in this matchup. Tryndamere players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Zac's lead.
How do I play Tryndamere against Zac?
When playing Tryndamere against Zac, play cautiously and avoid Zac's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Zac has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.