- Win Rate
- 51.6%
- Pick Rate
- 2.6%
- Ban Rate
- 4.9%
Tryndamere vs Warwick
- Patch
- 26.19
- Games
- 2,396
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Oct 4, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Tryndamere vs Warwick is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.19. Warwick wins with a 55.2% win rate (+10.3%) over Tryndamere based on 29 games. Warwick wins the early laning phase while Tryndamere scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Warwick matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who wins Tryndamere vs Warwick?
Tryndamere wins 56.3% of these games. With this many games the true rate is most likely between 39.3% and 71.8% (95% range).
- Expected
- 48.0% From both champions' overall Jungle win rates
- Matchup effect
- +8.2 pts Observed minus expected
- Sample
- 32 games Lane: Jungle
- vs patch 26.18
- — Not enough games on both patches
Lane: Jungle · Ranked Solo/Duo & Flex · North America server · All ranks · Patch 26.19 · Sep 24 – Sep 28
They also met in another lane (Top): 31 games, Tryndamere won 48.4%.
Key takeaways
- Current data slightly favors Tryndamere, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Tryndamere wins 56.3% of 32 games (95% range 39.3–71.8%).
- Both champions' overall Jungle win rates predict 48.0% for Tryndamere; the result is within the margin of error of that, so this matchup mostly reflects the two champions' general strength.
- Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 112, within the margin of error (31 games).
- Tryndamere players pick Last Stand much less often against Warwick: 91.6% of their other Jungle games, 75.0% here.
How we calculate this
Games: ranked Solo/Duo and Flex games on the North America server from the patch shown. Remakes (games under 5 minutes) are excluded.
A game only counts when Tryndamere and Warwick played the same position on opposite teams, so roaming, lane swaps within a team or a champion merely being in the same game never count as this matchup.
The 95% range is a Wilson score interval. Confidence comes from how wide that range is: within ±3 points is very high, ±5 high, ±8 moderate, anything wider low. Below 20 games a matchup is not classified at all.
Expected win rate combines both champions’ win rates in this lane (same games and filters) with the log5 formula: E = A(1−B) / (A(1−B) + B(1−A)). Matchup effect = observed − expected.
"What changes" compares Tryndamere's choices in this matchup with the same champion's other games in the same lane, and lists a change only when it is at least 3 points and statistically significant (two-proportion z-test, |z| ≥ 2, 20+ games).
Results are not split by rank: the sample per rank is too small for honest per-rank matchup numbers.
Tryndamere vs Warwick Laning Stats
At 15 minutes
Whole-game averages
Tryndamere vs Warwick Win Rate by Game Length
Tryndamere's win rate against Warwick by game length. The dot is the win rate, the bar its 95% range and the dashed line the champion's usual win rate at that length. Lengths with fewer than 25 games are left blank.
No game length stands out: Tryndamere's results against Warwick in short and long games are within the margin of error of each other.
Tryndamere vs Warwick Power Spikes
Who is ahead at each stage, measured from these games. A stage reads "Even" when the difference is inside the margin of error, and "Insufficient data" when there are too few games to tell.
- Lane (15 min)EvenTryndamere gold at 15: −112
- First itemInsufficient data
- Games under 20 minInsufficient data
- 20–30 min gamesInsufficient data
- 30+ min gamesInsufficient data
What Tryndamere Changes Against Warwick
Choices Tryndamere players make noticeably more or less often in this matchup than in their other Jungle games.
Last StandRuneUsually91.6%vs Warwick75.0%−16.6 pts58.3% WR here- E > Q > Wthe E > Q > W skill orderSkill priorityUsually12.4%vs Warwickunder 2%−12.4 pts
Cut DownRuneUsually1.7%vs Warwick12.5%+10.8 pts
Move Speed (flex)Stat shardUsually5.2%vs Warwick15.6%+10.4 pts
Adaptive Force (flex)Stat shardUsually94.4%vs Warwick84.4%−10.0 pts59.3% WR here- E > W > Qthe E > W > Q skill orderSkill priorityUsuallyunder 0.5%vs Warwick9.4%+9.4 pts
Taste of BloodRuneUsually1.7%vs Warwick9.4%+7.7 pts
Usually2.4%vs Warwick9.4%+6.9 pts
Best Tryndamere Build vs Warwick
Usual Tryndamere build (Jungle)
60.9% win rate · 23 games
Against Warwick
Not enough matchup-specific build data: only 3 of 24 Tryndamere games against Warwick carried a complete build, which is too few to recommend an item path from. Use Tryndamere's standard build instead.
- Skill priority: Q > E > W — the same as usual.
Builds are ranked by the lower edge of their win rate range, not the raw win rate, so a build seen in a handful of wins never outranks a proven one.
Best Tryndamere Runes vs Warwick
Usual Tryndamere runes (Jungle)
Lethal Tempo
53.1% win rate · 147 games
Against Warwick
Too few games for a matchup-specific rune page yet — use the usual page.
Plan your Tryndamere draft in Draft Lab
Draft Lab lays out both teams lane by lane with live matchup win rates, damage profiles and game-phase lean, and suggests picks and bans from current meta data.
- Full 5v5 draft board
- Lane matchup win rates
- Pick and ban suggestions
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.19. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Other Tryndamere Matchups
Hardest for Tryndamere
Easiest for Tryndamere
Win rate and games for each matchup. Lists are ranked by the edge of the 95% range so small samples cannot top them; matchups with at least 50 games only.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Warwick FAQ - Patch 26.19
Who wins Tryndamere vs Warwick?
Current data slightly favors Tryndamere, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Tryndamere wins 56.3% of 32 games (95% range 39.3–71.8%).
What is Tryndamere's win rate against Warwick?
Tryndamere wins 56.3% of 32 Jungle games against Warwick on patch 26.19 (95% range 39.3–71.8%). Based on both champions' overall Jungle win rates, 48.0% would be expected.
Does Tryndamere counter Warwick?
Not clearly. Tryndamere wins 56.3% of 32 games against Warwick, and the 95% range (39.3–71.8%) includes 50%, so neither champion reliably counters the other on current data.
Who wins lane, Tryndamere or Warwick?
Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 112, within the margin of error (31 games).
Does Tryndamere outscale Warwick?
There are too few games of each length to tell yet.
When is Warwick strongest against Tryndamere?
On current data there is no stage of the game where Warwick is ahead of Tryndamere beyond the margin of error.
What should Tryndamere build against Warwick?
There are not enough games for a matchup-specific core, so use Tryndamere's usual Jungle core: Kraken Slayer, Phantom Dancer, Lord Dominik's Regards. The biggest change against Warwick: Fiendhunter Bolts (2.4% usually, 9.4% here).
What runes should Tryndamere use against Warwick?
Use Tryndamere's usual Lethal Tempo page (Precision + Inspiration); there are too few games for a matchup-specific page. The biggest change against Warwick: Last Stand (91.6% usually, 75.0% here).