Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Chamber
57.3% WR
VS
Iso
42.7% WR
Who Wins the Chamber vs Iso Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 96
57.3%
Win Rate
42.7%
1.28
Avg KDA
1.26
17.0
Avg Kills
16.8
15.2
Avg Deaths
17.1
141.2
DMG/Round
147.6
31.5%
HS %
30.9%
215
Combat Score
224
51.6%
Attack WR
47.9%
52.1%
Defense WR
48.4%
Chamber vs Iso Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 96 matches reveals that Chamber holds a clear advantage over Iso in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Iso shows strength in one category, Chamber's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.28Chamber
1.26Iso
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Chamber and Iso, with KDA ratios of 1.28 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
141.2Chamber
147.6Iso
Iso outputs 147.6 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 141.2 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Iso secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
51.6%Chamber
47.9%Iso
Chamber shows stronger attack-side performance with a 51.6% win rate versus Iso's 47.9%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Chamber provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
52.1%Chamber
48.4%Iso
Defensive capabilities favor Chamber at 52.1% win rate compared to Iso's 48.4%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Chamber provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Chamber vs Iso matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 96 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 57.3% of the time compared to Iso's 42.7%, a 14.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Chamber consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Chamber has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Chamber and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Chamber vs Iso Fragging Analysis
Chamber claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Chamber vs Iso matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 96 ranked games reveals Chamber consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Chamber in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Chamber dominates.
Avg KDA
1.28Chamber
1.26Iso
The KDA comparison between Chamber and Iso reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Chamber averaging 1.28 and Iso posting 1.26. This razor-thin margin of just 0.03 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.0Chamber
16.8Iso
Kill production between Chamber and Iso is virtually identical, with Chamber averaging 17.0 kills per game and Iso securing 16.8. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
15.2Chamber
17.1Iso
Chamber demonstrates markedly better survivability against Iso, recording 15.2 deaths per game versus 17.1. Dying nearly 1.9 fewer times per match gives Chamber significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Iso players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
141.2Chamber
147.6Iso
Iso applies 6.4 more damage per round than Chamber in this matchup (147.6 vs 141.2 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Iso contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Chamber can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
31.5%Chamber
30.9%Iso
Chamber lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.5% vs 30.9%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 0.6 percentage point edge translates to Chamber more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Iso can fully react. Iso players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Chamber's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Chamber vs Iso Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Chamber
51.6%
47.9%
Defense Side
Chamber
52.1%
48.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Chamber holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Chamber vs Iso matchup, winning 51.6% of offensive rounds compared to 47.9% for Iso. This 3.7 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 96 matches reveals Chamber's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Chamber consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Iso teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Chamber's favor in this matchup. When Chamber takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Iso. For Iso players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Chamber's advantages. Chamber can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 58.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 39.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 58.3% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 39.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Chamber's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.7% attack-side gap suggests Chamber excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Iso should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Chamber's kit advantages become decisive. For Chamber, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Chamber demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Iso, holding 52.1% of rounds versus 48.4%. This 3.7 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Chamber's defensive advantage. Chamber can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Iso should avoid solo anchor positions against Chamber — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Iso's site with Chamber on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Chamber in this matchup. Our 96 match analysis shows Chamber converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Iso should never attempt solo retakes against Chamber — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Chamber can confidently take 1vX retakes that Iso should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Chamber's defensive advantages. Iso should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Chamber, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Chamber can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Iso should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Chamber holds clear advantages on both attack (51.6%) and defense (52.1%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Chamber vs Iso matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Chamber doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Chamber's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Chamber performs better. Iso teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Iso with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Iso's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Chamber is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Chamber provides a measurable ranked advantage. Iso players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Chamber confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Chamber wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.5 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Iso isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Chamber) vs Duelist (Iso) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Chamber's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Iso's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Chamber's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Iso's Duelist kit counters others. The Chamber advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Chamber vs Iso matchup breakdown: Chamber dominates with a 57.3% win rate across 96 matches. Superior fragging (1.28 KDA) gives Chamber a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
