Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Chamber
39.7% WR
VS
Sage
60.3% WR
Who Wins the Chamber vs Sage Matchup?
Winner
Sage
Matches: 68
39.7%
Win Rate
60.3%
1.31
Avg KDA
1.52
16.6
Avg Kills
14.4
14.7
Avg Deaths
13.8
150.5
DMG/Round
133.3
27.7%
HS %
29.7%
230
Combat Score
202
46.0%
Attack WR
51.1%
48.9%
Defense WR
54.0%
Chamber vs Sage Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 68 matches reveals that Sage holds a clear advantage over Chamber in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Chamber shows strength in one category, Sage's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.31Chamber
1.52Sage
Sage maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.52 KDA versus Chamber's 1.31. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Sage players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
150.5Chamber
133.3Sage
Chamber delivers substantially higher damage per round (150.5 ADR) compared to Sage's 133.3 ADR. This 17.2 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Chamber a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
46.0%Chamber
51.1%Sage
On the attacking side, Sage dominates with a 51.1% win rate compared to Chamber's 46.0%. This 5.1 percentage point gap indicates Sage is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
48.9%Chamber
54.0%Sage
Sage excels on the defensive half with a commanding 54.0% win rate, far surpassing Chamber's 48.9%. This 5.1 percentage point advantage demonstrates Sage's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Chamber vs Sage matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 68 competitive matches analyzed, Sage wins 60.3% of the time compared to Chamber's 39.7%, a 20.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sage consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Sage has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Chamber should never take isolated fights against Sage and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Chamber vs Sage Fragging Analysis
Sage edges out Chamber in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 68 matches analyzed, this Chamber vs Sage matchup remains contestable for both sides. Chamber shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Chamber's favor.
Avg KDA
1.31Chamber
1.52Sage
Sage holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.52 compared to Chamber's 1.31. While this 0.21 point difference indicates Sage tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sage's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Chamber players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.6Chamber
14.4Sage
Chamber substantially outfrags Sage in this matchup, averaging 16.6 kills compared to 14.4 — a difference of nearly 2.2 eliminations per match. When Chamber faces Sage, the data clearly shows Chamber finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sage players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Chamber in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.7Chamber
13.8Sage
Sage survives longer in this matchup, dying 13.8 times per game compared to Chamber's 14.7 deaths. This 0.9 death difference per match means Sage is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Chamber players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Sage's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
150.5Chamber
133.3Sage
Chamber significantly outdamages Sage in head-to-head encounters, posting 150.5 ADR versus 133.3. This 17.2 damage-per-round advantage means Chamber consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Sage players should avoid prolonged dueling with Chamber — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
27.7%Chamber
29.7%Sage
Sage demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Chamber: 29.7% versus 27.7%. This 2.0 percentage point gap in precision means Sage ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Chamber faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Chamber vs Sage Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sage
46.0%
51.1%
Defense Side
Sage
48.9%
54.0%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sage holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Chamber vs Sage matchup, winning 51.1% of offensive rounds compared to 46.0% for Chamber. This 5.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 68 matches reveals Sage's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Sage consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Chamber teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Sage's favor in this matchup. When Sage takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Chamber. For Chamber players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Sage's advantages. Sage can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 58.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 39.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 58.3% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 39.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Sage's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 5.1% attack-side gap suggests Sage excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Chamber should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Sage's kit advantages become decisive. For Sage, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sage demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Chamber, holding 54.0% of rounds versus 48.9%. This 5.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Sage's defensive advantage. Sage can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Chamber should avoid solo anchor positions against Sage — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Chamber's site with Sage on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Sage in this matchup. Our 68 match analysis shows Sage converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Chamber should never attempt solo retakes against Sage — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Sage can confidently take 1vX retakes that Chamber should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Sage's defensive advantages. Chamber should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Sage, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Sage can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Chamber should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Sage demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (51.1%) and defense (54.0%), comprehensively outperforming Chamber across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 68 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Sage holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Chamber's disadvantage in this matchup. Sage outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Chamber into Sage, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Chamber's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Chamber in isolated Sage encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Chamber when you expect to face Sage frequently. The 10.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Sage is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Sage decisively wins the Chamber vs Sage matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Sage has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Chamber players facing Sage should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Chamber and Sage fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Sage is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Sage's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Chamber vs Sage matchup guide: Sage leads with a 60.3% win rate, but Chamber can still win. Learn how Chamber's 151 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 68-match dataset into ranked wins.
