Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Chamber
58.3% WR
VS
KAY/O
38.9% WR
Who Wins the Chamber vs KAY/O Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 36
58.3%
Win Rate
38.9%
1.27
Avg KDA
1.54
15.3
Avg Kills
13.2
13.8
Avg Deaths
14.1
139.5
DMG/Round
126.6
28.1%
HS %
29.3%
211
Combat Score
192
51.5%
Attack WR
48.0%
52.0%
Defense WR
48.5%
Chamber vs KAY/O Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 36 matches reveals that Chamber holds a clear advantage over KAY/O in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While KAY/O shows strength in one category, Chamber's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.27Chamber
1.54KAY/O
KAY/O maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.54 KDA versus Chamber's 1.27. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests KAY/O players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
139.5Chamber
126.6KAY/O
Chamber outputs 139.5 average damage per round, edging out KAY/O's 126.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Chamber secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
51.5%Chamber
48.0%KAY/O
Chamber shows stronger attack-side performance with a 51.5% win rate versus KAY/O's 48.0%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Chamber provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
52.0%Chamber
48.5%KAY/O
Defensive capabilities favor Chamber at 52.0% win rate compared to KAY/O's 48.5%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Chamber provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Chamber vs KAY/O matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 36 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 58.3% of the time compared to KAY/O's 38.9%, a 19.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where KAY/O consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Initiator matchup, Chamber has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. KAY/O should never take isolated fights against Chamber and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Chamber vs KAY/O Fragging Analysis
Chamber edges out KAY/O in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 36 matches analyzed, this Chamber vs KAY/O matchup remains contestable for both sides. KAY/O shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in KAY/O's favor.
Avg KDA
1.27Chamber
1.54KAY/O
KAY/O demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Chamber, maintaining a 1.54 KDA versus 1.27. This 0.27 point gap reflects KAY/O's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Chamber players facing KAY/O should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where KAY/O's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.3Chamber
13.2KAY/O
Chamber substantially outfrags KAY/O in this matchup, averaging 15.3 kills compared to 13.2 — a difference of nearly 2.1 eliminations per match. When Chamber faces KAY/O, the data clearly shows Chamber finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. KAY/O players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Chamber in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
13.8Chamber
14.1KAY/O
Chamber survives longer in this matchup, dying 13.8 times per game compared to KAY/O's 14.1 deaths. This 0.3 death difference per match means Chamber is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. KAY/O players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Chamber's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
139.5Chamber
126.6KAY/O
Chamber significantly outdamages KAY/O in head-to-head encounters, posting 139.5 ADR versus 126.6. This 12.8 damage-per-round advantage means Chamber consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. KAY/O players should avoid prolonged dueling with Chamber — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
28.1%Chamber
29.3%KAY/O
KAY/O lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (29.3% vs 28.1%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.2 percentage point edge translates to KAY/O more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Chamber can fully react. Chamber players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off KAY/O's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Chamber vs KAY/O Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Chamber
51.5%
48.0%
Defense Side
Chamber
52.0%
48.5%
Attack Side Breakdown
Chamber holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Chamber vs KAY/O matchup, winning 51.5% of offensive rounds compared to 48.0% for KAY/O. This 3.5 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 36 matches reveals Chamber's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Chamber consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. KAY/O teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Chamber's favor in this matchup. When Chamber takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than KAY/O. For KAY/O players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Chamber's advantages. Chamber can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 58.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 39.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 58.3% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 39.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Chamber's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.5% attack-side gap suggests Chamber excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. KAY/O should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Chamber's kit advantages become decisive. For Chamber, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Chamber demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against KAY/O, holding 52.0% of rounds versus 48.5%. This 3.5 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Chamber's defensive advantage. Chamber can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. KAY/O should avoid solo anchor positions against Chamber — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target KAY/O's site with Chamber on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Chamber in this matchup. Our 36 match analysis shows Chamber converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. KAY/O should never attempt solo retakes against Chamber — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Chamber can confidently take 1vX retakes that KAY/O should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Chamber's defensive advantages. KAY/O should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Chamber, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Chamber can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, KAY/O should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Chamber holds clear advantages on both attack (51.5%) and defense (52.0%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Chamber vs KAY/O matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Chamber doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Chamber's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Chamber performs better. KAY/O teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair KAY/O with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports KAY/O's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Chamber is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Chamber provides a measurable ranked advantage. KAY/O players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Chamber confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Chamber wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.0 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. KAY/O isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Initiator Dynamics
The Sentinel (Chamber) vs Initiator (KAY/O) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Chamber's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than KAY/O's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Chamber's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while KAY/O's Initiator kit counters others. The Chamber advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Chamber vs KAY/O matchup breakdown: Chamber dominates with a 58.3% win rate across 36 matches. Higher damage output (139 ADR) gives Chamber a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
