Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Chamber
47.0% WR
VS
Clove
51.4% WR
Who Wins the Chamber vs Clove Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 1,033
47.0%
Win Rate
51.4%
1.29
Avg KDA
1.39
16.9
Avg Kills
17.6
15.0
Avg Deaths
18.1
142.6
DMG/Round
153.7
29.7%
HS %
31.4%
217
Combat Score
234
47.3%
Attack WR
49.1%
50.9%
Defense WR
52.7%
Chamber vs Clove Performance Breakdown
In the Chamber vs Clove matchup, Clove demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 1,033 analyzed matches, Clove outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Clove the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.29Chamber
1.39Clove
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Chamber and Clove, with KDA ratios of 1.29 and 1.39 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
142.6Chamber
153.7Clove
Clove outputs 153.7 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 142.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Clove secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.3%Chamber
49.1%Clove
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Chamber at 47.3% and Clove at 49.1% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.9%Chamber
52.7%Clove
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Chamber posting a 50.9% win rate and Clove at 52.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Chamber vs Clove matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 1,033 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 51.4% of the time compared to Chamber's 47.0%, a 4.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Controller matchup, Clove has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Chamber players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Chamber vs Clove Fragging Analysis
Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Chamber vs Clove matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 1,033 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Chamber in direct combat scenarios. While Chamber manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Chamber players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.
Avg KDA
1.29Chamber
1.39Clove
The KDA comparison between Chamber and Clove reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Chamber averaging 1.29 and Clove posting 1.39. This razor-thin margin of just 0.10 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.9Chamber
17.6Clove
Clove secures approximately 0.7 more kills per match than Chamber in this head-to-head (17.6 vs 16.9). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Clove contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Clove's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Chamber can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.0Chamber
18.1Clove
The death disparity between Chamber and Clove is stark: 15.0 versus 18.1 deaths per game. Clove dies 3.1 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Chamber or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Chamber.
DMG/Round
142.6Chamber
153.7Clove
Clove significantly outdamages Chamber in head-to-head encounters, posting 153.7 ADR versus 142.6. This 11.1 damage-per-round advantage means Clove consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Chamber players should avoid prolonged dueling with Clove — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
29.7%Chamber
31.4%Clove
Clove lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.4% vs 29.7%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.7 percentage point edge translates to Clove more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Chamber can fully react. Chamber players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Clove's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Chamber vs Clove Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Clove
47.3%
49.1%
Defense Side
Clove
50.9%
52.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Clove demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Chamber in this matchup, converting 49.1% of attacking rounds versus 47.3%. While this 1.7 point edge gives Clove slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 1,033 competitive games suggests Clove's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Chamber teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.7% gap.
When taking entry duels, Clove holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Chamber players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Clove can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 58.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 39.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 58.3% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 39.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Clove's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Chamber should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.7 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Clove shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Chamber, winning 52.7% of defense rounds compared to 50.9%. This 1.7 percentage point edge suggests Clove's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Chamber players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Clove can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.7% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Chamber should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Clove demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Clove converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Chamber should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Clove when you can wait for teammates. Clove can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.7% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Chamber should be more conservative with eco aggression against Clove and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Clove can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove holds clear advantages on both attack (49.1%) and defense (52.7%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Chamber vs Clove matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Clove doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Clove's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Clove performs better. Chamber teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Chamber with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Chamber's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Clove is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Clove provides a measurable ranked advantage. Chamber players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Clove confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Clove wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.4 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Chamber isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Controller Dynamics
The Sentinel (Chamber) vs Controller (Clove) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Chamber's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Clove's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Chamber's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Clove's Controller kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Chamber vs Clove is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.0% vs 51.4%). Based on 1,033 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
