Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Chamber
51.5% WR
VS
Skye
47.3% WR
Who Wins the Chamber vs Skye Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 165
51.5%
Win Rate
47.3%
1.34
Avg KDA
1.43
16.7
Avg Kills
14.1
14.5
Avg Deaths
15.0
143.9
DMG/Round
125.4
29.1%
HS %
29.0%
219
Combat Score
190
46.7%
Attack WR
44.9%
55.1%
Defense WR
53.3%
Chamber vs Skye Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 165 matches reveals that Chamber holds a clear advantage over Skye in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Skye shows strength in one category, Chamber's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.34Chamber
1.43Skye
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Chamber and Skye, with KDA ratios of 1.34 and 1.43 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
143.9Chamber
125.4Skye
Chamber delivers substantially higher damage per round (143.9 ADR) compared to Skye's 125.4 ADR. This 18.6 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Chamber a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
46.7%Chamber
44.9%Skye
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Chamber at 46.7% and Skye at 44.9% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
55.1%Chamber
53.3%Skye
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Chamber posting a 55.1% win rate and Skye at 53.3%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Chamber vs Skye matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 165 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 51.5% of the time compared to Skye's 47.3%, a 4.2 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Chamber consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Initiator matchup, Chamber has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Skye players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Chamber vs Skye Fragging Analysis
Chamber claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Chamber vs Skye matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 165 ranked games reveals Chamber consistently outperforms Skye in direct combat scenarios. While Skye manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Chamber in gunfights. Skye players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Chamber dominates.
Avg KDA
1.34Chamber
1.43Skye
The KDA comparison between Chamber and Skye reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Chamber averaging 1.34 and Skye posting 1.43. This razor-thin margin of just 0.09 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.7Chamber
14.1Skye
Chamber substantially outfrags Skye in this matchup, averaging 16.7 kills compared to 14.1 — a difference of nearly 2.6 eliminations per match. When Chamber faces Skye, the data clearly shows Chamber finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Skye players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Chamber in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.5Chamber
15.0Skye
Chamber survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.5 times per game compared to Skye's 15.0 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Chamber is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Skye players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Chamber's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
143.9Chamber
125.4Skye
Chamber significantly outdamages Skye in head-to-head encounters, posting 143.9 ADR versus 125.4. This 18.6 damage-per-round advantage means Chamber consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Skye players should avoid prolonged dueling with Chamber — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
29.1%Chamber
29.0%Skye
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Chamber (29.1%) and Skye (29.0%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Chamber vs Skye Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Chamber
46.7%
44.9%
Defense Side
Chamber
55.1%
53.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Chamber demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Skye in this matchup, converting 46.7% of attacking rounds versus 44.9%. While this 1.8 point edge gives Chamber slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Skye players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 165 competitive games suggests Chamber's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Skye teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.8% gap.
When taking entry duels, Chamber holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Skye players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Chamber can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 58.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 39.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 58.3% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 39.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Chamber's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Skye should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.8 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Chamber shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Skye, winning 55.1% of defense rounds compared to 53.3%. This 1.8 percentage point edge suggests Chamber's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Skye players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Chamber can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.8% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Skye should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Chamber demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Chamber converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Skye should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Chamber when you can wait for teammates. Chamber can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.8% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Skye should be more conservative with eco aggression against Chamber and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Chamber can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Chamber holds clear advantages on both attack (46.7%) and defense (55.1%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Chamber vs Skye matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Chamber doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Chamber's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Chamber performs better. Skye teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Skye with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Skye's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Chamber is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Chamber provides a measurable ranked advantage. Skye players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Chamber confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Chamber wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.5 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Skye isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Initiator Dynamics
The Sentinel (Chamber) vs Initiator (Skye) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Chamber's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Skye's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Chamber's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Skye's Initiator kit counters others. The Chamber advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Chamber vs Skye head-to-head analysis. Chamber holds a 51.5% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 165 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
