ChamberComps
Discover the best team compositions featuring Chamber in Valorant. Top comp: Chamber, Jett, Neon, Sova, Viper (56.4% win rate). With 36 team compositions analyzed, find the perfect synergies for this Sentinel.
Discover the most effective team compositions featuring Chamber in Valorant's competitive meta, analyzed from 113,306 matches across all skill tiers. The highest-performing composition pairs Chamber with Jett, Neon, Sova, Viper, achieving an impressive 56.4% win rate. Among the 36 team compositions containing Chamber, 2 are A-tier compositions, indicating strong synergy potential. As a Sentinel, Chamber contributes unique value to team compositions through anchoring sites and providing flank protection. The average win rate across all Chamber compositions is 51.5%, demonstrating this agent's positive impact on team success. Players seeking to maximize their ranked performance should consider pairing Chamber with proven teammates from these top-performing compositions, while also considering map-specific synergies and counter-pick potential.
Rank | Agents | Tier | Mode | Rank | Platform | Matches | Win Rate | Pick Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,850 | 56.4% | 0.41% | ||
| B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,515 | 55.1% | 0.34% | ||
| A Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 4,488 | 55.1% | 1.00% | ||
| #4 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,218 | 54.5% | 0.27% | |
| #5 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 3,201 | 53.8% | 0.71% | |
| #6 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,364 | 53.7% | 0.30% | |
| #7 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,112 | 53.5% | 0.47% | |
| #8 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 5,487 | 53.4% | 1.22% | |
| #9 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,162 | 53.4% | 0.48% | |
| #10 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,279 | 53.4% | 0.28% | |
| #11 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 4,329 | 52.7% | 0.96% | |
| #12 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 3,143 | 52.6% | 0.70% | |
| #13 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,658 | 52.5% | 0.59% | |
| #14 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 3,038 | 52.4% | 0.68% | |
| #15 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,584 | 52.1% | 0.35% | |
| #16 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,921 | 52.1% | 0.65% | |
| #17 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,484 | 52.0% | 0.33% | |
| #18 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,602 | 51.9% | 0.36% | |
| #19 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,765 | 51.9% | 0.61% | |
| #20 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 15,996 | 51.9% | 3.56% | |
| #21 | B Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 7,162 | 51.7% | 1.59% | |
| #22 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,909 | 51.5% | 0.42% | |
| #23 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,754 | 51.5% | 0.39% | |
| #24 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,301 | 50.9% | 0.51% | |
| #25 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,653 | 50.7% | 0.59% | |
| #26 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 9,053 | 50.5% | 2.01% | |
| #27 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,443 | 50.1% | 0.54% | |
| #28 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,605 | 50.0% | 0.36% | |
| #29 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,716 | 50.0% | 0.60% | |
| #30 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 4,236 | 49.9% | 0.94% | |
| #31 | C Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 3,440 | 49.0% | 0.76% | |
| #32 | D Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,789 | 47.8% | 0.40% | |
| #33 | D Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,736 | 47.8% | 0.61% | |
| #34 | D Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,490 | 46.4% | 0.33% | |
| #35 | D Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 1,646 | 45.7% | 0.37% | |
| #36 | D Tier | Competitive | All Ranks | All Platforms | 2,177 | 45.2% | 0.48% | |
Build the Perfect Team Comp
Assemble both teams in Comp Lab, pick a map, and see role balance, per-agent map fit, and matchup edges — all computed from real competitive matches before the round starts.
- Full 5v5 comp builder
- Per-agent map fit & win rates
- Matchup edges vs enemy picks
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best team compositions with Chamber in Valorant?
The best team composition featuring Chamber consists of Chamber, Jett, Neon, Sova, Viper, achieving a 56.4% win rate across 1,850 competitive matches. This A-tier composition maximizes Chamber's potential as a Sentinel.
How many viable team comps include Chamber?
There are 36 recorded team compositions featuring Chamber in the current Valorant meta. Of these, 2 are considered high-tier (S or A tier) compositions with above-average win rates.
What agents synergize best with Chamber?
Based on win rate analysis, Chamber synergizes best with agents found in top-performing compositions. The most successful pairings come from teams including Jett, Neon, Sova, Viper. These combinations leverage Chamber's Sentinel abilities effectively.
What is Chamber's average team composition win rate?
Across 36 team compositions, Chamber averages a 51.5% win rate. The best composition achieves 56.4% while maintaining a 0.41% pick rate in competitive play.
Should I pick Chamber for ranked team compositions?
Chamber is a viable choice for ranked team compositions, appearing in 36 recorded comps. With 28 compositions showing above 50% win rate, Chamber can contribute positively when paired with the right teammates. Consider your team's existing picks and map selection when deciding.
