- Win Rate
- 49.5%
- Matches
- 386
- KDA
- 1.40
Clove vs Phoenix Matchups
- Patch
- 13.06
- Matches
- 845,270
- Region
- All Regions
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Platform
- All Platforms
- Mode
- Competitive
- Last Updated
- Oct 4, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Clove vs Phoenix is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (49.5% vs 49.2%). Based on 386 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
Clove Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Clove vs Phoenix Matchup?
Clove vs Phoenix Performance Breakdown
The Clove vs Phoenix matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 386 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Clove vs Phoenix Matchup Summary
The Clove vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 386 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 49.5% of the time compared to Phoenix's 49.2%, a 0.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Neither Clove nor Phoenix has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Clove vs Phoenix Fragging Analysis
Clove edges out Phoenix in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 386 matches analyzed, this Clove vs Phoenix matchup remains contestable for both sides. Phoenix shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Phoenix's favor.
Clove vs Phoenix Attack and Defense Performance
47.2%
47.3%52.7%52.7%Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Clove and Phoenix reveals near-perfect parity, with Clove winning 47.2% of attacking rounds compared to Phoenix's 47.3%. This negligible 0.1 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Clove nor Phoenix should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 386 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Clove and Phoenix players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Clove or Phoenix, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.1% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Clove and Phoenix is virtually identical, with Clove holding 52.7% of rounds on CT side and Phoenix at 52.7%. This 0.0 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Clove and Phoenix can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.0% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Clove and Phoenix. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 386 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Clove or Phoenix.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Clove vs Phoenix specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
The Clove vs Phoenix matchup presents a fascinating strategic dynamic where each agent excels on a different side of the map. Phoenix dominates attack rounds with their 47.3% win rate, while Clove controls defensive situations at 52.7%. This asymmetry creates complex tactical considerations that both players should understand before the match begins.
Map selection and side choice become especially important in this matchup. Attack-sided maps favor Phoenix, while defense-sided maps benefit Clove. Consider this when vetoing maps and selecting starting sides in competitive play. Team composition should also account for this asymmetry — pairing Phoenix with strong defensive agents and Clove with good attackers can create a more balanced overall team performance.
For ranked climbing, recognize which half will be your stronger phase and adjust expectations accordingly. If you're playing Phoenix, be aggressive on attack and accept that defensive rounds will be harder. If you're playing Clove, prepare for difficult attack rounds while banking wins on defense. Mental game is crucial — don't tilt when your weak half goes poorly, and capitalize on your strong half to build leads.
The attack-side advantage (0.1% gap) is larger than the defense-side gap (0.0%), meaning Phoenix technically has a slight overall edge when games go to overtime or economic resets. However, in standard ranked play with equal economy phases, this matchup is genuinely balanced with different agents excelling at different times.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Duelist (Phoenix) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Phoenix's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Phoenix's Duelist kit counters others. The Phoenix advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Build the Perfect Team Comp
Assemble both teams in Comp Lab, pick a map, and see role balance, per-agent map fit, and matchup edges — all computed from real competitive matches before the round starts.
- Full 5v5 comp builder
- Per-agent map fit & win rates
- Matchup edges vs enemy picks
Clove has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 59.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 41.9% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.49% | 1,846 | 1.39 | 153.1 | 31.7% | 47.7% | 52.8% | |
| 50.71% | 1,619 | 1.38 | 154.1 | 31.6% | 48.7% | 52.4% | |
| 50.55% | 1,179 | 1.38 | 152.6 | 32.3% | 48.8% | 51.7% | |
| 48.54% | 1,094 | 1.38 | 152.3 | 31.2% | 47.3% | 51.8% | |
| 49.52% | 1,042 | 1.41 | 152.8 | 31.2% | 48.1% | 52.3% | |
| 53.57% | 840 | 1.41 | 152.1 | 31.6% | 49.2% | 53.4% | |
| 48.07% | 830 | 1.40 | 154.8 | 30.9% | 49.1% | 50.0% | |
| 53.86% | 828 | 1.42 | 154.4 | 31.5% | 49.1% | 53.8% | |
| 48.25% | 514 | 1.37 | 152.9 | 30.5% | 46.5% | 53.2% | |
| 51.18% | 465 | 1.43 | 153.7 | 30.6% | 48.5% | 53.6% | |
| 53.26% | 445 | 1.42 | 154.3 | 30.1% | 47.5% | 53.4% | |
| 49.48% | 386 | 1.40 | 158.6 | 32.1% | 47.2% | 52.7% | |
| 49.71% | 340 | 1.31 | 146.0 | 31.6% | 48.4% | 51.9% | |
| 54.22% | 308 | 1.39 | 150.1 | 31.8% | 46.7% | 54.1% | |
| 47.27% | 275 | 1.28 | 145.6 | 31.0% | 46.8% | 51.6% | |
| 41.92% | 229 | 1.33 | 148.9 | 31.6% | 45.5% | 49.8% | |
| 54.91% | 224 | 1.45 | 156.7 | 32.1% | 49.1% | 54.1% | |
| 55.73% | 192 | 1.35 | 148.4 | 31.1% | 49.7% | 53.5% | |
| 51.22% | 164 | 1.36 | 151.4 | 30.6% | 51.1% | 50.1% | |
| 52.99% | 134 | 1.41 | 153.2 | 32.6% | 49.3% | 53.2% | |
| 53.78% | 119 | 1.40 | 154.7 | 30.2% | 50.4% | 50.8% | |
| 47.62% | 105 | 1.38 | 152.2 | 31.2% | 45.9% | 52.2% | |
| 54.76% | 84 | 1.38 | 148.5 | 30.2% | 49.1% | 54.2% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 1.43 | 160.5 | 32.9% | 51.0% | 51.5% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 1.49 | 164.1 | 30.6% | 47.4% | 50.2% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.33 | 145.9 | 27.7% | 50.0% | 53.7% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.42 | 165.7 | 35.2% | 53.4% | 56.3% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.16 | 139.5 | 33.2% | 52.5% | 47.2% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clove's best matchup in Valorant?
Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 59.3% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 41.9% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
