Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Clove
51.2% WR
VS
Phoenix
47.5% WR
Who Wins the Clove vs Phoenix Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 240
51.2%
Win Rate
47.5%
1.39
Avg KDA
1.44
17.4
Avg Kills
16.9
18.1
Avg Deaths
15.8
157.2
DMG/Round
154.3
31.7%
HS %
30.2%
235
Combat Score
231
46.6%
Attack WR
46.8%
53.2%
Defense WR
53.2%
Clove vs Phoenix Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 240 matches reveals that Phoenix holds a clear advantage over Clove in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Clove shows strength in one category, Phoenix's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.39Clove
1.44Phoenix
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Clove and Phoenix, with KDA ratios of 1.39 and 1.44 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
157.2Clove
154.3Phoenix
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Clove averaging 157.2 ADR and Phoenix at 154.3 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
46.6%Clove
46.8%Phoenix
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Clove at 46.6% and Phoenix at 46.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
53.2%Clove
53.2%Phoenix
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Clove posting a 53.2% win rate and Phoenix at 53.2%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Clove vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 240 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 51.2% of the time compared to Phoenix's 47.5%, a 3.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Clove has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Phoenix players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Clove vs Phoenix Fragging Analysis
Clove edges out Phoenix in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 240 matches analyzed, this Clove vs Phoenix matchup remains contestable for both sides. Phoenix shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Phoenix's favor.
Avg KDA
1.39Clove
1.44Phoenix
The KDA comparison between Clove and Phoenix reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Clove averaging 1.39 and Phoenix posting 1.44. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.4Clove
16.9Phoenix
Kill production between Clove and Phoenix is virtually identical, with Clove averaging 17.4 kills per game and Phoenix securing 16.9. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
18.1Clove
15.8Phoenix
The death disparity between Phoenix and Clove is stark: 15.8 versus 18.1 deaths per game. Clove dies 2.3 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Phoenix or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Phoenix.
DMG/Round
157.2Clove
154.3Phoenix
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Clove (157.2 ADR) and Phoenix (154.3 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
31.7%Clove
30.2%Phoenix
Clove lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.7% vs 30.2%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.5 percentage point edge translates to Clove more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Phoenix can fully react. Phoenix players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Clove's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Clove vs Phoenix Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Phoenix
46.6%
46.8%
Defense Side
Phoenix
53.2%
53.2%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Clove and Phoenix reveals near-perfect parity, with Clove winning 46.6% of attacking rounds compared to Phoenix's 46.8%. This negligible 0.2 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Clove nor Phoenix should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 240 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Clove and Phoenix players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Clove or Phoenix, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Clove has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 61.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 41.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Clove matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 61.1% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 41.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.2% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Clove and Phoenix is virtually identical, with Clove holding 53.2% of rounds on CT side and Phoenix at 53.2%. This 0.0 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Clove and Phoenix can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.0% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Clove and Phoenix. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 240 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Clove or Phoenix.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Clove vs Phoenix specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Phoenix maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.8% attack win rate and 53.2% defense win rate. While Phoenix is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Clove remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Phoenix specific factors. The slight Phoenix advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Phoenix are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Phoenix has a slight statistical edge, but Clove is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Clove, don't switch to Phoenix just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Duelist (Phoenix) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Phoenix's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Phoenix's Duelist kit counters others. The Phoenix advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Clove vs Phoenix head-to-head analysis. Clove holds a 51.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 240 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
