Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Clove
44.7% WR
VS
Veto
55.3% WR
Who Wins the Clove vs Veto Matchup?
Winner
Veto
Matches: 76
44.7%
Win Rate
55.3%
1.40
Avg KDA
1.29
17.7
Avg Kills
16.3
18.2
Avg Deaths
14.6
158.2
DMG/Round
143.1
30.7%
HS %
30.3%
241
Combat Score
216
47.6%
Attack WR
48.8%
51.2%
Defense WR
52.4%
Clove vs Veto Performance Breakdown
The Clove vs Veto matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 76 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.40Clove
1.29Veto
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Clove and Veto, with KDA ratios of 1.40 and 1.29 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
158.2Clove
143.1Veto
Clove delivers substantially higher damage per round (158.2 ADR) compared to Veto's 143.1 ADR. This 15.1 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Clove a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
47.6%Clove
48.8%Veto
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Clove at 47.6% and Veto at 48.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.2%Clove
52.4%Veto
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Clove posting a 51.2% win rate and Veto at 52.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Clove vs Veto matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 76 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 55.3% of the time compared to Clove's 44.7%, a 10.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Sentinel matchup, Veto has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Clove should never take isolated fights against Veto and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Clove vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Clove vs Veto matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 76 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Veto in direct combat scenarios. While Veto manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Veto players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.
Avg KDA
1.40Clove
1.29Veto
Clove holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.40 compared to Veto's 1.29. While this 0.10 point difference indicates Clove tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Clove's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Veto players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
17.7Clove
16.3Veto
Clove secures approximately 1.4 more kills per match than Veto in this head-to-head (17.7 vs 16.3). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Clove contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Clove's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Veto can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
18.2Clove
14.6Veto
The death disparity between Veto and Clove is stark: 14.6 versus 18.2 deaths per game. Clove dies 3.6 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Veto or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Veto.
DMG/Round
158.2Clove
143.1Veto
Clove significantly outdamages Veto in head-to-head encounters, posting 158.2 ADR versus 143.1. This 15.1 damage-per-round advantage means Clove consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Veto players should avoid prolonged dueling with Clove — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
30.7%Clove
30.3%Veto
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Clove (30.7%) and Veto (30.3%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Clove vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Veto
47.6%
48.8%
Defense Side
Veto
51.2%
52.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Veto demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Clove in this matchup, converting 48.8% of attacking rounds versus 47.6%. While this 1.1 point edge gives Veto slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Clove players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 76 competitive games suggests Veto's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Clove teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Veto holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Clove players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Veto can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Clove has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 64.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 41.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Clove matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 64.7% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 41.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Veto's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Clove should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Veto shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Clove, winning 52.4% of defense rounds compared to 51.2%. This 1.1 percentage point edge suggests Veto's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Clove players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Veto can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Clove should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Veto demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Veto converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Clove should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Veto when you can wait for teammates. Veto can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Clove should be more conservative with eco aggression against Veto and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Veto can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Veto maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.8% attack win rate and 52.4% defense win rate. While Veto is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Clove remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Veto specific factors. The slight Veto advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Veto are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Veto has a slight statistical edge, but Clove is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Clove, don't switch to Veto just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Sentinel (Veto) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Veto's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Veto's Sentinel kit counters others. The Veto advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Clove vs Veto matchup guide: Veto leads with a 55.3% win rate, but Clove can still win. Learn how Clove's 158 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 76-match dataset into ranked wins.
