Clove vs Viper Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side

Viper

47.1%

48.6%

Defense Side

Viper

51.4%

52.9%

Attack Side Breakdown

Viper demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Clove in this matchup, converting 48.6% of attacking rounds versus 47.1%. While this 1.5 point edge gives Viper slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Clove players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 183 competitive games suggests Viper's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Clove teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.5% gap.

When taking entry duels, Viper holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Clove players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Viper can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Viper's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Clove should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.5 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Viper shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Clove, winning 52.9% of defense rounds compared to 51.4%. This 1.5 percentage point edge suggests Viper's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Clove players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Viper can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.5% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Clove should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Viper demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Viper converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Clove should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Viper when you can wait for teammates. Viper can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.5% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Clove should be more conservative with eco aggression against Viper and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Viper can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Viper holds clear advantages on both attack (48.6%) and defense (52.9%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Clove vs Viper matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Viper doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.

Viper's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Viper performs better. Clove teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Clove with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Clove's positioning.

For ranked climbing specifically, Viper is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Viper provides a measurable ranked advantage. Clove players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Viper confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.

The verdict is clear: Viper wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Clove isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.

Controller vs Controller Dynamics

Both Clove and Viper fill the Controller role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Controller performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Viper is the stronger Controller pick when these agents face each other.

In Controller vs Controller encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Viper's statistical advantage suggests their specific Controller kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.