Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Clove
51.3% WR
VS
Jett
47.4% WR
Who Wins the Clove vs Jett Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 1,169
51.3%
Win Rate
47.4%
1.39
Avg KDA
1.26
17.2
Avg Kills
17.2
17.8
Avg Deaths
16.1
153.0
DMG/Round
151.4
31.5%
HS %
30.1%
231
Combat Score
232
47.6%
Attack WR
46.7%
53.3%
Defense WR
52.4%
Clove vs Jett Performance Breakdown
In the Clove vs Jett matchup, Clove demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 1,169 analyzed matches, Clove outperforms Jett in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Clove the statistically favored pick when facing Jett in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.39Clove
1.26Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Clove and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.39 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
153.0Clove
151.4Jett
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Clove averaging 153.0 ADR and Jett at 151.4 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
47.6%Clove
46.7%Jett
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Clove at 47.6% and Jett at 46.7% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
53.3%Clove
52.4%Jett
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Clove posting a 53.3% win rate and Jett at 52.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Clove vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 1,169 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 51.3% of the time compared to Jett's 47.4%, a 3.9 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Clove has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Jett players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Clove vs Jett Fragging Analysis
Clove edges out Jett in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,169 matches analyzed, this Clove vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Jett shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Jett's favor.
Avg KDA
1.39Clove
1.26Jett
Clove holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.39 compared to Jett's 1.26. While this 0.13 point difference indicates Clove tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Clove's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Jett players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
17.2Clove
17.2Jett
Kill production between Clove and Jett is virtually identical, with Clove averaging 17.2 kills per game and Jett securing 17.2. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
17.8Clove
16.1Jett
Jett demonstrates markedly better survivability against Clove, recording 16.1 deaths per game versus 17.8. Dying nearly 1.7 fewer times per match gives Jett significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Clove players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
153.0Clove
151.4Jett
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Clove (153.0 ADR) and Jett (151.4 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
31.5%Clove
30.1%Jett
Clove lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.5% vs 30.1%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.5 percentage point edge translates to Clove more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Jett can fully react. Jett players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Clove's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Clove vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Clove
47.6%
46.7%
Defense Side
Clove
53.3%
52.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Clove and Jett reveals near-perfect parity, with Clove winning 47.6% of attacking rounds compared to Jett's 46.7%. This negligible 0.8 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Clove nor Jett should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 1,169 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Clove and Jett players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Clove or Jett, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Clove has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 64.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 41.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Clove matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 64.7% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 41.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.8% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Clove and Jett is virtually identical, with Clove holding 53.3% of rounds on CT side and Jett at 52.4%. This 0.8 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Clove and Jett can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.8% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Clove and Jett. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 1,169 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Clove or Jett.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Clove vs Jett specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.6% attack win rate and 53.3% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Jett remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Jett specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Jett are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Jett is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Jett, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Clove vs Jett head-to-head analysis. Clove holds a 51.3% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 1,169 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
