Clove vs IsoMatchups
Clove vs Iso head-to-head analysis. Clove holds a 53.4% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 58 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Clove Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Clove vs Iso Matchup?
Clove vs Iso Performance Breakdown
The Clove vs Iso matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 58 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Clove vs Iso Matchup Summary
The Clove vs Iso matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 58 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 53.4% of the time compared to Iso's 46.6%, a 6.9 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Clove dominates this matchup statistically. Clove can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Iso should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Clove vs Iso Fragging Analysis
Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Clove vs Iso matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 58 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.
Clove vs Iso Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Iso demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Clove in this matchup, converting 50.0% of attacking rounds versus 48.7%. While this 1.3 point edge gives Iso slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Clove players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 58 competitive games suggests Iso's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Clove teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.3% gap.
When taking entry duels, Iso holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Clove players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Iso can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
In post-plant situations, Iso's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Clove should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.3 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Iso shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Clove, winning 51.3% of defense rounds compared to 50.0%. This 1.3 percentage point edge suggests Iso's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Clove players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Iso can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.3% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Clove should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Iso demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Iso converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Clove should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Iso when you can wait for teammates. Iso can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.3% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Clove should be more conservative with eco aggression against Iso and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Iso can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Iso maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 50.0% attack win rate and 51.3% defense win rate. While Iso is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Clove remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Iso specific factors. The slight Iso advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Iso are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Iso has a slight statistical edge, but Clove is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Clove, don't switch to Iso just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Duelist (Iso) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Iso's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Iso's Duelist kit counters others. The Iso advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Clove has favorable matchups against 19 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 27.8% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.58% | 601 | 1.40 | 154.5 | 31.3% | 49.6% | 52.2% | |
| 51.84% | 571 | 1.38 | 150.4 | 31.0% | 48.1% | 52.9% | |
| 52.13% | 422 | 1.39 | 154.3 | 31.5% | 49.7% | 51.2% | |
| 53.14% | 414 | 1.40 | 152.5 | 32.0% | 48.5% | 53.8% | |
| 47.04% | 406 | 1.37 | 152.2 | 31.1% | 47.8% | 51.1% | |
| 48.13% | 374 | 1.38 | 149.6 | 30.8% | 47.2% | 52.6% | |
| 54.28% | 374 | 1.41 | 154.1 | 30.7% | 49.3% | 53.3% | |
| 50.44% | 339 | 1.39 | 154.2 | 30.5% | 49.0% | 50.6% | |
| 50.00% | 178 | 1.40 | 155.0 | 29.9% | 48.1% | 50.9% | |
| 49.32% | 146 | 1.41 | 157.5 | 30.6% | 45.5% | 54.6% | |
| 53.15% | 143 | 1.44 | 157.4 | 29.6% | 49.2% | 53.8% | |
| 56.31% | 103 | 1.32 | 143.8 | 31.2% | 49.0% | 53.8% | |
| 49.47% | 95 | 1.29 | 146.1 | 31.0% | 47.9% | 53.3% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 1.33 | 142.7 | 29.1% | 50.8% | 50.1% | |
| 47.73% | 88 | 1.31 | 147.4 | 31.4% | 46.2% | 53.1% | |
| 58.33% | 84 | 1.44 | 155.6 | 31.2% | 49.8% | 54.7% | |
| 40.85% | 71 | 1.33 | 146.6 | 31.5% | 45.0% | 50.4% | |
| 51.47% | 68 | 1.39 | 154.6 | 30.4% | 49.6% | 50.3% | |
| 56.06% | 66 | 1.41 | 156.3 | 32.7% | 48.8% | 54.8% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 1.36 | 151.0 | 29.8% | 48.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 51 | 1.42 | 145.2 | 31.5% | 51.8% | 53.7% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 1.42 | 150.7 | 31.3% | 49.3% | 56.0% | |
| 41.03% | 39 | 1.37 | 155.9 | 32.3% | 44.4% | 49.8% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.40 | 157.7 | 29.3% | 53.7% | 50.5% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.35 | 156.0 | 29.4% | 46.5% | 40.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.52 | 174.9 | 36.0% | 52.3% | 52.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.07 | 128.3 | 22.7% | 50.8% | 47.9% | |
| 100.00% | 3 | 1.45 | 177.2 | 28.0% | 76.9% | 67.9% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clove's best matchup in Valorant?
Clove's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 27.8% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 19 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.