Clove vs ChamberMatchup
Clove vs Chamber head-to-head analysis. Clove holds a 50.7% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 475 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Clove Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Clove vs Chamber Matchup?
Clove vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
In the Clove vs Chamber matchup, Clove demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 475 analyzed matches, Clove outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Clove the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.
Clove vs Chamber Matchup Summary
The Clove vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 475 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 50.7% of the time compared to Chamber's 49.3%, a 1.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Sentinel matchup, Clove holds a minor advantage, but Chamber can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Clove vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Clove vs Chamber matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 475 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Chamber in direct combat scenarios. While Chamber manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Chamber players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.
Clove vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Clove and Chamber reveals near-perfect parity, with Clove winning 48.8% of attacking rounds compared to Chamber's 47.8%. This negligible 0.9 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Clove nor Chamber should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 475 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Clove and Chamber players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Clove or Chamber, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.9% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Clove and Chamber is virtually identical, with Clove holding 52.2% of rounds on CT side and Chamber at 51.2%. This 0.9 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Clove and Chamber can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.9% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Clove and Chamber. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 475 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Clove or Chamber.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Clove vs Chamber specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.8% attack win rate and 52.2% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Chamber remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Chamber is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Chamber, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Clove has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Deadlock at 39.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.74% | 475 | 1.37 | 151.2 | 31.2% | 48.8% | 52.2% | |
| 50.11% | 465 | 1.39 | 152.6 | 31.5% | 46.5% | 53.6% | |
| 49.44% | 356 | 1.37 | 153.5 | 31.2% | 48.0% | 50.7% | |
| 52.62% | 325 | 1.42 | 152.3 | 31.4% | 48.2% | 53.3% | |
| 46.60% | 294 | 1.33 | 152.4 | 32.2% | 47.6% | 50.8% | |
| 50.73% | 274 | 1.36 | 147.3 | 31.2% | 47.4% | 52.8% | |
| 53.31% | 257 | 1.41 | 153.1 | 31.1% | 49.1% | 53.1% | |
| 50.71% | 211 | 1.37 | 151.9 | 30.8% | 48.9% | 51.8% | |
| 45.89% | 146 | 1.35 | 153.2 | 30.3% | 44.3% | 53.1% | |
| 53.38% | 133 | 1.45 | 154.1 | 30.7% | 47.2% | 53.9% | |
| 50.82% | 122 | 1.40 | 151.5 | 30.3% | 48.7% | 52.8% | |
| 41.03% | 78 | 1.38 | 152.2 | 32.0% | 45.7% | 52.0% | |
| 50.00% | 78 | 1.25 | 142.9 | 31.3% | 46.1% | 52.5% | |
| 53.95% | 76 | 1.29 | 143.5 | 32.8% | 49.3% | 52.4% | |
| 51.32% | 76 | 1.37 | 151.7 | 32.4% | 46.8% | 52.7% | |
| 62.12% | 66 | 1.46 | 153.5 | 31.5% | 50.3% | 56.9% | |
| 60.00% | 55 | 1.37 | 149.3 | 30.0% | 50.5% | 54.8% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 1.44 | 159.3 | 30.9% | 52.3% | 49.6% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 1.23 | 142.9 | 29.5% | 42.2% | 51.6% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 1.26 | 150.2 | 34.6% | 45.1% | 48.7% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.41 | 158.7 | 31.6% | 51.2% | 50.6% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.40 | 154.2 | 32.1% | 48.4% | 47.8% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.35 | 161.3 | 35.4% | 50.2% | 45.8% | |
| 71.43% | 21 | 1.47 | 145.8 | 28.6% | 51.9% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.61 | 171.8 | 30.0% | 44.9% | 51.2% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.58 | 168.0 | 35.7% | 64.4% | 65.2% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.27 | 141.3 | 34.3% | 37.5% | 54.5% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clove's best matchup in Valorant?
Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Deadlock, with only a 39.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.