Clove vs Chamber matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
50.7%
Matches
475
Avg KDA
1.37
Avg ADR
151

Clove vs ChamberMatchup

Controller
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Clove vs Chamber head-to-head analysis. Clove holds a 50.7% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 475 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.

Clove Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Chamber - 50.7% win rateChamber(50.7%)
Clove - 50.7% win rate in this matchup
Clove
50.7% WR
VS
Chamber vs Clove matchup - 49.3% win rate
Chamber
49.3% WR

Who Wins the Clove vs Chamber Matchup?

Clove wins the Clove vs Chamber matchup
Winner
Clove
Matches: 475
50.7%
Win Rate
49.3%
1.37
Avg KDA
1.29
17.0
Avg Kills
16.5
18.0
Avg Deaths
14.8
151.2
DMG/Round
141.4
31.2%
HS %
28.9%
231
Combat Score
215
48.8%
Attack WR
47.8%
52.2%
Defense WR
51.2%

Clove vs Chamber Performance Breakdown

Clove vs Chamber matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Clove vs Chamber matchup, Clove demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 475 analyzed matches, Clove outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Clove the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.37Clove
1.29Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Clove and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.37 and 1.29 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
151.2Clove
141.4Chamber
Clove outputs 151.2 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 141.4 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Clove secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
48.8%Clove
47.8%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Clove at 48.8% and Chamber at 47.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.2%Clove
51.2%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Clove posting a 52.2% win rate and Chamber at 51.2%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.

Clove vs Chamber Matchup Summary

The Clove vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 475 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 50.7% of the time compared to Chamber's 49.3%, a 1.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Sentinel matchup, Clove holds a minor advantage, but Chamber can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.

Clove vs Chamber Fragging Analysis

Clove wins fragging stats against Chamber in Valorant

Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Clove vs Chamber matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 475 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Chamber in direct combat scenarios. While Chamber manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Chamber players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.

KDA
1.37Clove
1.29Chamber
The KDA comparison between Clove and Chamber reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Clove averaging 1.37 and Chamber posting 1.29. This razor-thin margin of just 0.08 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.0Clove
16.5Chamber
Clove secures approximately 0.5 more kills per match than Chamber in this head-to-head (17.0 vs 16.5). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Clove contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Clove's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Chamber can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
18.0Clove
14.8Chamber
The death disparity between Chamber and Clove is stark: 14.8 versus 18.0 deaths per game. Clove dies 3.2 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Chamber or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Chamber.
DMG/Round
151.2Clove
141.4Chamber
Clove applies 9.8 more damage per round than Chamber in this matchup (151.2 vs 141.4 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Clove contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Chamber can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Headshot %
31.2%Clove
28.9%Chamber
Clove demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Chamber: 31.2% versus 28.9%. This 2.3 percentage point gap in precision means Clove ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Chamber faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).

Clove vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Clove
Clove48.8%
Chamber47.8%
Defense Side
Clove
Clove52.2%
Chamber51.2%

Attack Side Breakdown

The attack-side comparison between Clove and Chamber reveals near-perfect parity, with Clove winning 48.8% of attacking rounds compared to Chamber's 47.8%. This negligible 0.9 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.

From a tactical standpoint, neither Clove nor Chamber should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 475 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.

For entry fragging specifically, both Clove and Chamber players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Clove or Chamber, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.

Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.9% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.

Defense Side Breakdown

Defensive performance between Clove and Chamber is virtually identical, with Clove holding 52.2% of rounds on CT side and Chamber at 51.2%. This 0.9 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.

Both Clove and Chamber can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.9% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.

Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Clove and Chamber. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 475 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Clove or Chamber.

Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Clove vs Chamber specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.

Overall Side Analysis

Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.8% attack win rate and 52.2% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Chamber remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Chamber is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Chamber, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Controller vs Sentinel Dynamics

The Controller (Clove) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Clove has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Deadlock at 39.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Clove matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
50.74%4751.37151.231.2%48.8%52.2%
50.11%4651.39152.631.5%46.5%53.6%
49.44%3561.37153.531.2%48.0%50.7%
52.62%3251.42152.331.4%48.2%53.3%
46.60%2941.33152.432.2%47.6%50.8%
50.73%2741.36147.331.2%47.4%52.8%
53.31%2571.41153.131.1%49.1%53.1%
50.71%2111.37151.930.8%48.9%51.8%
45.89%1461.35153.230.3%44.3%53.1%
53.38%1331.45154.130.7%47.2%53.9%
50.82%1221.40151.530.3%48.7%52.8%
41.03%781.38152.232.0%45.7%52.0%
50.00%781.25142.931.3%46.1%52.5%
53.95%761.29143.532.8%49.3%52.4%
51.32%761.37151.732.4%46.8%52.7%
62.12%661.46153.531.5%50.3%56.9%
60.00%551.37149.330.0%50.5%54.8%
51.11%451.44159.330.9%52.3%49.6%
39.53%431.23142.929.5%42.2%51.6%
46.15%391.26150.234.6%45.1%48.7%
50.00%321.41158.731.6%51.2%50.6%
48.00%251.40154.232.1%48.4%47.8%
42.86%211.35161.335.4%50.2%45.8%
71.43%211.47145.828.6%51.9%55.6%
50.00%141.61171.830.0%44.9%51.2%
83.33%61.58168.035.7%64.4%65.2%
40.00%51.27141.334.3%37.5%54.5%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Clove's best matchup in Valorant?

Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Clove's hardest matchup?

Clove's hardest matchup is against Deadlock, with only a 39.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Clove have?

Clove has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?

When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Controllers