Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Clove's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Clove
50.1% WR
VS
Fade
48.1% WR
Who Wins the Clove vs Fade Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 686
50.1%
Win Rate
48.1%
1.42
Avg KDA
1.37
17.7
Avg Kills
14.8
18.2
Avg Deaths
15.3
153.5
DMG/Round
128.3
31.0%
HS %
29.8%
234
Combat Score
194
47.9%
Attack WR
47.3%
52.7%
Defense WR
52.1%
Clove vs Fade Performance Breakdown
In the Clove vs Fade matchup, Clove demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 686 analyzed matches, Clove outperforms Fade in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Clove the statistically favored pick when facing Fade in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.42Clove
1.37Fade
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Clove and Fade, with KDA ratios of 1.42 and 1.37 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
153.5Clove
128.3Fade
Clove delivers substantially higher damage per round (153.5 ADR) compared to Fade's 128.3 ADR. This 25.2 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Clove a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
47.9%Clove
47.3%Fade
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Clove at 47.9% and Fade at 47.3% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.7%Clove
52.1%Fade
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Clove posting a 52.7% win rate and Fade at 52.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Clove vs Fade matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 686 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 50.1% of the time compared to Fade's 48.1%, a 2.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Initiator matchup, Clove holds a minor advantage, but Fade can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Clove vs Fade Fragging Analysis
Clove claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Clove vs Fade matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 686 ranked games reveals Clove consistently outperforms Fade in direct combat scenarios. While Fade manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Clove in gunfights. Fade players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Clove dominates.
Avg KDA
1.42Clove
1.37Fade
The KDA comparison between Clove and Fade reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Clove averaging 1.42 and Fade posting 1.37. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.7Clove
14.8Fade
Clove substantially outfrags Fade in this matchup, averaging 17.7 kills compared to 14.8 — a difference of nearly 2.9 eliminations per match. When Clove faces Fade, the data clearly shows Clove finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Fade players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Clove in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
18.2Clove
15.3Fade
The death disparity between Fade and Clove is stark: 15.3 versus 18.2 deaths per game. Clove dies 2.8 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Clove either takes unfavorable fights against Fade or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Clove players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Fade.
DMG/Round
153.5Clove
128.3Fade
The damage differential between Clove and Fade is exceptional: 153.5 ADR compared to just 128.3. Clove deals 25.2 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Clove's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Fade struggles to even trade effectively. Fade players should treat Clove as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
31.0%Clove
29.8%Fade
Clove lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.0% vs 29.8%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.3 percentage point edge translates to Clove more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Fade can fully react. Fade players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Clove's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Clove vs Fade Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Clove
47.9%
47.3%
Defense Side
Clove
52.7%
52.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Clove and Fade reveals near-perfect parity, with Clove winning 47.9% of attacking rounds compared to Fade's 47.3%. This negligible 0.6 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Clove nor Fade should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 686 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Clove and Fade players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Clove or Fade, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Clove has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Clove's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 61.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 41.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Clove matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Clove's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 61.1% win rate. Clove excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Clove's hardest matchup?
Clove's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 41.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Clove should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Clove have?
Clove has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Clove in difficult matchups?
When playing Clove in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Clove's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Clove's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Clove's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.6% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Clove and Fade is virtually identical, with Clove holding 52.7% of rounds on CT side and Fade at 52.1%. This 0.6 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Clove and Fade can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.6% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Clove and Fade. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 686 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Clove or Fade.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Clove vs Fade specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.9% attack win rate and 52.7% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Fade remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Clove vs Fade specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Clove and Fade are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Fade is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Fade, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Initiator Dynamics
The Controller (Clove) vs Initiator (Fade) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Clove's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Fade's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Clove's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Fade's Initiator kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Clove vs Fade head-to-head analysis. Clove holds a 50.1% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 686 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
