Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
50.0% WR
VS
Veto
50.0% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Veto Matchup?
Winner
Fade
Matches: 38
50.0%
Win Rate
50.0%
1.33
Avg KDA
1.25
15.4
Avg Kills
17.6
16.0
Avg Deaths
16.0
133.4
DMG/Round
141.6
34.6%
HS %
30.6%
197
Combat Score
217
51.7%
Attack WR
49.9%
50.1%
Defense WR
48.3%
Fade vs Veto Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 38 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Veto in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Veto shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.33Fade
1.25Veto
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Veto, with KDA ratios of 1.33 and 1.25 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
133.4Fade
141.6Veto
Veto outputs 141.6 average damage per round, edging out Fade's 133.4 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Veto secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
51.7%Fade
49.9%Veto
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Fade at 51.7% and Veto at 49.9% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.1%Fade
48.3%Veto
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Fade posting a 50.1% win rate and Veto at 48.3%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Fade vs Veto matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 38 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 50.0% of the time compared to Veto's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Fade consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Neither Fade nor Veto has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Fade vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Fade edges out Veto in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 38 matches analyzed, this Fade vs Veto matchup remains contestable for both sides. Veto shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Veto's favor.
Avg KDA
1.33Fade
1.25Veto
The KDA comparison between Fade and Veto reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Fade averaging 1.33 and Veto posting 1.25. This razor-thin margin of just 0.08 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
15.4Fade
17.6Veto
Veto substantially outfrags Fade in this matchup, averaging 17.6 kills compared to 15.4 — a difference of nearly 2.2 eliminations per match. When Veto faces Fade, the data clearly shows Veto finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Fade players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Veto in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.0Fade
16.0Veto
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Fade (16.0 deaths/game) and Veto (16.0 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
133.4Fade
141.6Veto
Veto applies 8.2 more damage per round than Fade in this matchup (141.6 vs 133.4 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Veto contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Fade can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
34.6%Fade
30.6%Veto
Fade demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Veto: 34.6% versus 30.6%. This 4.0 percentage point gap in precision means Fade ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Veto faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Fade vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
51.7%
49.9%
Defense Side
Fade
50.1%
48.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Veto in this matchup, converting 51.7% of attacking rounds versus 49.9%. While this 1.9 point edge gives Fade slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 38 competitive games suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Veto teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.9% gap.
When taking entry duels, Fade holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Veto players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Fade has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.9% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.9% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Fade's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Veto should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.9 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Veto, winning 50.1% of defense rounds compared to 48.3%. This 1.9 percentage point edge suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Veto players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Fade can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.9% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Veto should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Fade demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Fade converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Veto should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Fade when you can wait for teammates. Fade can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.9% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Veto should be more conservative with eco aggression against Fade and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade holds clear advantages on both attack (51.7%) and defense (50.1%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Fade vs Veto matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Fade doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Fade's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Fade performs better. Veto teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Veto with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Veto's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Fade is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Fade provides a measurable ranked advantage. Veto players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Fade confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Fade wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.7 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Veto isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Fade) vs Sentinel (Veto) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Veto's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Veto's Sentinel kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.8%
53.5%
53.3%
51.1%
53.7%
49.4%
51.4%
52.1%
49.3%
51.4%
52.4%
50.9%
49.0%
52.0%
52.9%
50.7%
53.3%
54.4%
53.6%
50.1%
54.5%
53.2%
50.0%
61.7%
57.1%
62.8%
73.7%
Fade vs Veto head-to-head analysis. Fade holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 38 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
