Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
50.0% WR
VS
Vyse
50.0% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Vyse Matchup?
Winner
Fade
Matches: 102
50.0%
Win Rate
50.0%
1.44
Avg KDA
1.31
14.4
Avg Kills
15.2
14.6
Avg Deaths
14.7
130.9
DMG/Round
136.0
30.6%
HS %
32.9%
197
Combat Score
204
50.9%
Attack WR
50.4%
49.6%
Defense WR
49.1%
Fade vs Vyse Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 102 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Vyse in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Vyse shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.44Fade
1.31Vyse
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Vyse, with KDA ratios of 1.44 and 1.31 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
130.9Fade
136.0Vyse
Vyse outputs 136.0 average damage per round, edging out Fade's 130.9 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Vyse secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
50.9%Fade
50.4%Vyse
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Fade at 50.9% and Vyse at 50.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
49.6%Fade
49.1%Vyse
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Fade posting a 49.6% win rate and Vyse at 49.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Fade vs Vyse matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 102 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 50.0% of the time compared to Vyse's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Fade consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Neither Fade nor Vyse has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Fade vs Vyse Fragging Analysis
Vyse edges out Fade in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 102 matches analyzed, this Fade vs Vyse matchup remains contestable for both sides. Fade shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Fade's favor.
Avg KDA
1.44Fade
1.31Vyse
Fade holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.44 compared to Vyse's 1.31. While this 0.13 point difference indicates Fade tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Vyse players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Fade's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Vyse players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.4Fade
15.2Vyse
Vyse secures approximately 0.7 more kills per match than Fade in this head-to-head (15.2 vs 14.4). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Vyse contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Vyse's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Fade can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.6Fade
14.7Vyse
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Fade (14.6 deaths/game) and Vyse (14.7 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
130.9Fade
136.0Vyse
Vyse applies 5.1 more damage per round than Fade in this matchup (136.0 vs 130.9 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Vyse contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Fade can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.6%Fade
32.9%Vyse
Vyse demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Fade: 32.9% versus 30.6%. This 2.3 percentage point gap in precision means Vyse ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Fade faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Fade vs Vyse Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
50.9%
50.4%
Defense Side
Fade
49.6%
49.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Fade and Vyse reveals near-perfect parity, with Fade winning 50.9% of attacking rounds compared to Vyse's 50.4%. This negligible 0.5 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Fade nor Vyse should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 102 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Fade and Vyse players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Fade or Vyse, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Fade has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.5% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Fade and Vyse is virtually identical, with Fade holding 49.6% of rounds on CT side and Vyse at 49.1%. This 0.5 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Fade and Vyse can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.5% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Fade and Vyse. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 102 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Fade or Vyse.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Fade vs Vyse specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 50.9% attack win rate and 49.6% defense win rate. While Fade is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Vyse remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Fade vs Vyse specific factors. The slight Fade advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Fade and Vyse are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Fade has a slight statistical edge, but Vyse is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Vyse, don't switch to Fade just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Fade) vs Sentinel (Vyse) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Vyse's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Vyse's Sentinel kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Fade vs Vyse head-to-head analysis. Fade holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 102 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
