Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Fade's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Fade
45.7% WR
VS
Omen
52.1% WR
Who Wins the Fade vs Omen Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 94
45.7%
Win Rate
52.1%
1.43
Avg KDA
1.61
14.8
Avg Kills
15.3
14.7
Avg Deaths
14.9
131.4
DMG/Round
134.2
29.5%
HS %
29.8%
198
Combat Score
205
50.3%
Attack WR
48.9%
51.1%
Defense WR
49.7%
Fade vs Omen Performance Breakdown
The Fade vs Omen matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 94 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.43Fade
1.61Omen
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Fade and Omen, with KDA ratios of 1.43 and 1.61 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
131.4Fade
134.2Omen
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Fade averaging 131.4 ADR and Omen at 134.2 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
50.3%Fade
48.9%Omen
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Fade at 50.3% and Omen at 48.9% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.1%Fade
49.7%Omen
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Fade posting a 51.1% win rate and Omen at 49.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Fade vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 94 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 52.1% of the time compared to Fade's 45.7%, a 6.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Omen dominates this matchup statistically. Omen can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Fade should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Fade vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Omen claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Fade vs Omen matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 94 ranked games reveals Omen consistently outperforms Fade in direct combat scenarios. While Fade manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Omen in gunfights. Fade players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Omen dominates.
Avg KDA
1.43Fade
1.61Omen
Omen holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.61 compared to Fade's 1.43. While this 0.18 point difference indicates Omen tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Fade players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Omen's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Fade players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.8Fade
15.3Omen
Omen secures approximately 0.5 more kills per match than Fade in this head-to-head (15.3 vs 14.8). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Omen contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Omen's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Fade can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.7Fade
14.9Omen
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Fade (14.7 deaths/game) and Omen (14.9 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
131.4Fade
134.2Omen
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Fade (131.4 ADR) and Omen (134.2 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
29.5%Fade
29.8%Omen
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Fade (29.5%) and Omen (29.8%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Fade vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
50.3%
48.9%
Defense Side
Fade
51.1%
49.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Omen in this matchup, converting 50.3% of attacking rounds versus 48.9%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Fade slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Omen players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 94 competitive games suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Omen teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Fade holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Omen players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Fade has favorable matchups against 21 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Fade's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sova at 44.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Fade matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fade's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Fade excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Fade's hardest matchup?
Fade's hardest matchup is against Sova, with only a 44.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Fade should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Fade have?
Fade has 21 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Fade in difficult matchups?
When playing Fade in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Fade's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Fade's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Fade's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Fade's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Omen should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Omen, winning 51.1% of defense rounds compared to 49.7%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Omen players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Fade can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Omen should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Fade demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Fade converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Omen should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Fade when you can wait for teammates. Fade can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Omen should be more conservative with eco aggression against Fade and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 50.3% attack win rate and 51.1% defense win rate. While Fade is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Omen remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Fade vs Omen specific factors. The slight Fade advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Fade and Omen are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Fade has a slight statistical edge, but Omen is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Omen, don't switch to Fade just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Fade) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Fade's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Fade's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.9%
53.5%
53.4%
53.5%
51.1%
49.1%
51.1%
52.0%
49.6%
51.1%
52.4%
50.6%
52.0%
48.5%
52.3%
50.4%
53.5%
54.4%
53.2%
54.5%
50.1%
53.1%
50.0%
61.7%
57.1%
62.8%
73.7%
Fade vs Omen is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (45.7% vs 52.1%). Based on 94 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
